TREATMENT OUTCOMES IN ELDERLY AND SENILE PATIENTS WITH DEGENERATIVE DEFORMATIONS AND INSTABILITY OF THE SPINAL COLUMN
- Authors: Mikhaylov D.A.1, Ptashnikov D.A.1,2, Masevnin S.V.1, Smekalenkov O.A.1, Zaborovski N.S.1, Lapaeva O.A.1, Mooraby Z.2
-
Affiliations:
- Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics
- Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University
- Issue: Vol 23, No 2 (2017)
- Pages: 15-26
- Section: Clinical studies
- Submitted: 01.07.2017
- Accepted: 01.07.2017
- Published: 30.06.2017
- URL: https://journal.rniito.org/jour/article/view/722
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.21823/2311-2905-2017-23-2-15-26
- ID: 722
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Degenerative scoliosis is a prevalent issue among the aging population. Controversy remains over the role of surgical intervention in patients with such disease. The authors present the results of 14-year experience in treatment of this pathology. Various approaches to the surgical treatment depending on the stage of the disease and the degree of deformation, including decompression, instrumental posterior spinal fusion, anterior spinal fusion, and osteotomy were examined. Above treatment options are based on the analysis of clinical aspects, mechanical stability of deformation, the degree of imbalance in the body and causes of pain or neurological deficit.
The risk of postoperative complications is extremely high and seems to be outweighed by the possible successful outcomes of surgical treatment. The results presented in the treatment of degenerative scoliosis mainly provide positive outcomes and can assist in the selection of treatment for this group of patients.
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the treatment outcomes of elderly and senile patients with degenerative deformations and instability of the spinal column using various surgical techniques.
Material and methods. During the present retrospective study the authors analyzed 437 patients (337 (77%) women and 100 (23%) men) aged 60 years and older who underwent surgical treatment at Russian Research institute of traumatology and orthopaedics named after R.R.Vreden between 2000 and 2016. The study group included patients with diseases and consequences of injuries in the spine, leading to its deformation and following spinal stenosis with development of neurological deficit in some cases.
The patients were subdivided into four groups depending on surgical procedure. Patients in group I underwent decompression of neural structures at affected levels on both sides without implants for fixation. This group was used as the comparison group. Patients in group II underwent fixation the affected spinal motion segments locally with transpedicular system without correction of deformity and with decompression of neural structures at the level of spine stenosis. Patients of group III underwent surgery for fixation of affected PDS up to lower thoracic spine using short transpedicular system along with decompression of the neural structures and correction of spine deformity. Patients in group IV underwent surgery for fixation of affected PDS up to upper thoracic spine using transpedicular system, bone cement, decompression of neural structures and correction of spine deformity.
The average postoperative follow up was 5 years (from 3 months to 15 years), 266 patients were followed for more than three years.
Results. The best results were obtained in group IV: good results – 57,2% (60 patients), satisfactory 40% (42 patients), poor 2,8% (3 patients).
The worst results were obtained in group I: after 5 years follow up satisfactory results were observed in 13,4% (15 patients), poor in 86,6% (97 patients) and no good results were reported.
Conclusion. Thus, the performed study and observed outcomes indicate the rationale for performing a full deformity correction by transpedicular fixation and bone cement, applying all the required methods and techniques of osteotomy. This approach allows to maximally quickly achieve the desired treatment outcomes in mid-and long-term follow up period and to avoid complications and revisions.
About the authors
D. A. Mikhaylov
Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics
Author for correspondence.
Email: dim.m.a@mail.ru
Dmitry A. Mikhaylov – Cand. Sci. (Med) Neurosurgeon at Spine Surgery and Oncology Department.
8, ul. Akad. Baykova, St. Petersburg, 195427
РоссияD. A. Ptashnikov
Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics; Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University
Email: fake@neicon.ru
Dmitry A. Ptashnikov – Dr. Sci. (Med) Professor Head of Spine Surgery and Oncology Department, VRRITO; Head of Traumatology and Orthopedics Department N-WSMU.
8, ul. Akad. Baykova, St. Petersburg, 195427; 41, Kirochnaya ul., St. Petersburg, 191015
РоссияS. V. Masevnin
Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics
Email: fake@neicon.ru
Sergey V. Masevnin – Orthopedic Surgeon at Spine Surgery and Oncology Department.
8, ul. Akad. Baykova, St. Petersburg, 195427
РоссияO. A. Smekalenkov
Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics
Email: fake@neicon.ru
8, ul. Akad. Baykova, St. Petersburg, 195427
РоссияN. S. Zaborovski
Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics
Email: fake@neicon.ru
Nikita S. Zaborovskii – graduate Student, Orthopedic Surgeon at Spine Surgery and Oncology Department.
8, ul. Akad. Baykova, St. Petersburg, 195427
РоссияO. A. Lapaeva
Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics
Email: fake@neicon.ru
Olga A. Lapaeva – Orthopedic Surgeon.
8, ul. Akad. Baykova, St. Petersburg, 195427
РоссияZ. Mooraby
Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University
Email: fake@neicon.ru
41, Kirochnaya ul., St. Petersburg, 191015
РоссияReferences
- Докиш М.Ю., Усиков В.Д., Пташников Д.А., Фадеев Е.М., Магомедов Ш.Ш., Карагодин Д.Ф., Михайлов Д.А., Смекаленков О.А. Варианты хирургического лечения патологических переломов позвоночника у пациентов пожилого возраста с сопутствующим системным остеопорозом. Травматология и ортопедия России. 2008;(3):80-81.
- Козлов Д.М., Крутько А.В., Колотов Е.Б., Ахметьянов Ш.А. Отдаленные результаты хирургического лечения дегенеративных заболеваний поясничного отдела позвоночника у пациентов старше 60 лет. Вопросы нейрохирургии им. Н.Н. Бурденко. 2011;75(3):57-61.
- Крутько А.В., Дурни П., Васильев А.И., Булатов А.В. Минимально-инвазивные технологии в хирургическом лечении дегенеративного поясничного сколиоза взрослых. Хирургия позвоночника. 2014;(4):49-56.
- Усиков В.Д., Пташников Д.А., Михайлов Д.А., Смекаленков О.А. Результат хирургического лечения тяжелой кифотической деформации позвоночника. Хирургия позвоночника. 2010;(2):89-93.
- Хао Мэн, Пташников Д.А., Масевнин С.В., Михайлов Д.А. Оценка значимости сагиттального баланса и патологии межпозвонковых дисков в развитии дегенеративных изменений смежных позвоночно-двигательных сегментов после спондилодеза. Фундаментальные исследования. 2014;10(9):1811-1817.
- Albert T.J., Purtill J., Mesa J., McIntosh T., Balderston R.A. Health outcome assessment before and after adult deformity surgery. A prospective study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995;20(18):2002-2004.
- Bridwell K.H. Decision Making Regarding SmithPetersen vs. Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy vs. Vertebral Column Resection for Spinal Deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(19 Suppl):171-178. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000231963.72810.38.
- Carreon L.Y., Puno R.M., Dimar J.R. 2nd, Glassman S.D., Johnson J.R. Perioperative complications of posterior lumbar decompression and arthrodesis in older adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A(11):2089-2092.
- Charosky S., Guigui P., Blamoutier A., Roussouly P., Chopin D. Complications and risk factors of primary adult scoliosis surgery: a multicenter study of 306 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37(8):693-700. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822ff5c1.
- Cho K.J., Suk S.I., Park S.R., Kim J.H., Kim S.S., Choi W.K., Lee K.Y., Lee S.R. Complications in posterior fusion and instrumentation for degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(20):2232-2237. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31814b2d3c.
- Dangelmajer S., Zadnik B.A., Rodriguez S.T., Gokaslan Z.L., Daniel M. Sciubba D.M. Minimally invasive spine surgery for adult degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Neurosurgical Focus. 2014;36(5):E7. doi: 10.3171/2014.3.FOCUS144.
- De Wald C.J., Stanley T. Instrumentation-related complications of multilevel fusions for adult spinal deformity patients over age 65: surgical considerations and treatment options in patients with poor bone quality. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(19 Suppl):144-151. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000236893.65878.39.
- Fischer C.R., Terran J., Baron L., Mchugh B., Warren D., Glassman S., Bridell K., Schwab F., Lafage V. Factors predicting cost-effectiveness of adult spinal deformity surgery at 2 years. Spine Deform. 2014;2(5):415-422. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2014.04.011.
- Glassman S.D., Dimar II J.R., Carreon L.Y. Revision rate after adult deformity surgery. Spine Deform. 2015;3(2): 199-203. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2014.08.005.
- Park J., Carreon L.Y., Glassman S.D. Adult lumbar degenerative scoliosis 40 or less: outcomes of surgical treatment with minimum 2-year follow-up. Spine Deform. 2013;1(3):211-216. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2013.03.003.
- Ploumis A., Transfledt E.E., Denis F. Degenerative lumbar scoliosis associated with spinal stenosis. Spine J. 2007;7(4):428-36. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.07.015.
- Raffo C.S., Lauerman W.C. Predicting morbidity and mortality of lumbar spine arthrodesis in patients in their ninth decade. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(1):99-103.
- Schwab F., Ungar B., Blondel B., Buchowski J., Coe J., Deinlein D., Dewald C., Mehdian H., Shaffrey C., Tribus C., Lafage V. Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification – a validation study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37(12):1077-1082. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31823e15e2.
- Seo H.J., Kim H.J., Ro Y.J., Yang H.S. Non-neurologic complications following surgery for scoliosis. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2013;64(1):40-46. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2013.64.1.40.
- Silva F., Lenke L.G. Adult Degenerative scoliosis: evaluation and management. Neurosurg Focus. 2010;28(3):E1. doi: 10.3171/2010.1.FOCUS09271.
- Smith J., Kasliwal M., Crawford A., Shaffrey C.I. Outcomes, Expectations, and Complications Overview for the Surgical Treatment of Adult and Pediatric Spinal Deformity. Spine Deform. 2012. URL: http://www.spinedeformity.org/article/S2212-134X(12)00015-9/pdf.
- Transfeldt E.E., Topp R., Mehbod A.A., Winter R.B. Surgical outcomes of decompression, decompression with limited fusion, and decompression with full curve fusion for degenerative scoliosis with radiculopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(20):1872-1875. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ce63a2.
- Weber M.H., Mathew J.E., Takemoto S.K., Na L.N., Berven S. Postoperative recovery outcomes in adult scoliosis: a prospective multicenter database with 5-year follow-up. Spine Deform. 2014;2(3):226-232. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2014.01.001.
- Yadla S., Maltenfort M.G., Ratliff J.K., Harrop J.S. Adult scoliosis surgery outcomes: a systematic review. Neurosurgical Focus. 2010;28(3):E3. doi: 10.3171/2009.12.FOCUS09254.