Cover Page

Cite item


Damage of the long head of the biceps at the place of attachment to the articular tubercle supraglenoidal lip of shoulder, to the entrance and throughout intertubercle furrows are common causes of pain and dysfunction of the shoulder joint. At the same clinical manifestations of the morphology of such lesions may be different. The current literature discusses various options of surgical correction of the biceps injury. Variety of methods of surgical treatment and the lack of consensus in support of their application in different patients in different types of injuries were the basis for the present study. A prospective analysis of the functional results of surgical treatment of the 34 - year’s patients with associated rotator cuff (SSP+ISP+SSC+) and the tendon of the biceps muscle in age from 34 to 75 years. Options for surgical correction of the damaged part of the biceps were: biceps tenotomy, biceps tenotomy with intraarticular tenodez of the shoulder to the head before entering intertubercle furrow, biceps tenotomy and extraarticular subpectorialtenodez to the proximal humerus is intertubercle interferrent screw groove, as well as its attachment to the tendon suture large pectoral muscle. Choice of surgical approach depended on the patient's age, level of daily physical activity, morphology and localization of lesions. The best results were obtained when the extra-articular subpectorialtenodez of long head of the biceps to the proximal humerus interferrent screw and suture fixation to the pectoralis major muscle, the average follow-up was 16,6 ± 4,7 months.

About the authors

S. Y. Dokolin

Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics

Author for correspondence.
Russian Federation

V. I. Kuz'mina

Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics

Russian Federation

I. S. Bazarov

Kirov Military Medical Academy, chief - A.N. Belskikh

Russian Federation

M. A. Kislitsyn

Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics

Russian Federation


  1. Burkhart S. The cowboy's companion : a trail guide for the arthroscopic shoulder surgeon. Philadelphia : Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012. 495 p.
  2. Delle Rose G., Borroni M., Silvestro A., Garofalo R., Conti M., De Nittis P., Castagna A. The long head of biceps as a source of pain in active population: tenotomy or tenodesis? A comparison of 2 case series with isolated lesions. Musculoskelet Surg. 2012; 96, Suppl. 1:S47-52.
  3. Denard P.J, Dai X., Hanypsiak B.T., Burkhart S.S. Anatomy of the biceps tendon: implications for restoring physiological length-tension relation during biceps tenodesis with interference screw fixation. Arthroscopy. 2012; 28(10):1352-1358.
  4. Ditsios K., Agathangelidis F., Boutsiadis A., Karataglis D., Papadopoulos P. Long head of the biceps pathology combined with rotator cuff tears. Adv. Orthop. 2012;2012:405472.
  5. Elser F., Braun S., Dewing C.B., Giphart J.E., Millett P.J. Anatomy, function, injuries, and treatment of the long head of the biceps brachii tendon Arthroscopy. 2011; 27(4):581-592.
  6. Franceschi F., Longo U.G., Ruzzini L., Rizzello G., Maffulli N., Denaro V. No advantages in repairing a type II superior labrum anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesion when associated with rotator cuff repair in patients over age 50: a randomized controlled trial. Am. J. Sports Med. 2008; 36(2):247-253.
  7. Franceschi F., Longo U.G., Ruzzini L., Rizzello G., Maffulli N., Denaro V. Soft tissue tenodesis of the long head of the biceps tendon associated to the Roman Bridge repair. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;9:78.
  8. Friedman D.J., Dunn J.C., Higgins L.D., Warner J.J. Proximal biceps tendon: injuries and management. Sports Med. Arthrosc. 2008;16(3):162-169.
  9. Gegory J.M., Harwood D.P., Gochanour E., Sherman S.L. Clinacal outcomes of revision biceps tenodesis. Int. J. Shoulder Surg. 2012; 6(2):45-50.
  10. Hsu A.R., Ghodadra N.S., Provencher M.T., Lewis P.B., Bach B.R. Biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis: a review of clinical outcomes and biomechanical results. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011;20(2):326-332.
  11. Itoi E., Motzkin N.E., Morrey B.F., An K.N. Stabilizing function of the long head of the biceps in the hanging arm position. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1994;3(3):135-142.
  12. Jarrett C.D., Schmidt C.C. Arthroscopic treatment of rotator cuff disease J. Hand Surg. Am. 2011;36(9):1541-1552.
  13. Ji J.H., Shafi M., Jeong J.J., Lee Y.S., McFarland E.G., Kim T.K., Chung J.Y. Transtendon arthroscopic repair of high grade partial-thickness articular surface tears of the rotator cuff with biceps tendon augmentation: technical note and preliminary results. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 2012;132(3):335-342.
  14. Kim S.J., Lee I.S., Kim S.H., Woo C.M., Chun Y.M. Arthroscopic repair of concomitant type II SLAP lesions in large to massive rotator cuff tears: comparison with biceps tenotomy. Am. J. Sports Med. 2012;40(12):2786-2793.
  15. Levy A.S., Kelly B.T., Lintner S.A., Osbahr D.C., Speer K.P. Function of the long head of the biceps at the shoulder: electromyographic analysis. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001;10(3):250
  16. Pill S.G., Walch G., Hawkins R.J., Kissenberth M.J. The role of the biceps tendon in massive rotator cuff tears. Instr. Course Lect. 2012;61:113-120.
  17. Snyder S.J., Banas M.P., Johnston S.P. et al. An analyses of 140 injures to the superior glenoid labrum. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1995; 4(4):243-248.

Copyright (c)

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 82474 от 10.12.2021.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies