THE INFLUENCE OF COMPUTER-ASSISTED SURGERY ON CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC OUTCOMES OF PERIАRTICULAR FEMUR AND TIBIA OSTEOTOMIES IN OSTEOARTHRITIC PATIENTS (REVIEW)

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Nowadays the clinical application of digital technologies became a growing trend at every stage of orthopedic patient treatment: from diagnostic procedures and pre-operative planning to intra-operative control of surgical manipulations and evaluation of final results later. The aim of thi sresearch was to analyze the studies dedicated to application of computer-assisted surgery (CAS) for femur and tibial osteotomies in patients with gonarthrosis. The hypothesis was that CAS improves the precision of leg alignment correction in frontal and sagittal planes that positively influencing both functional result of treatment and longevity of clinical effect. The PubMed, PubMedCentral, GoogleScholar and eLIBRARY searched for relevant studies using following key words: knee, osteoarthritis, gonarthrosis, osteotomy, CAS, navigation and its russian analogs. The majority of publications favored CAS in comparison to traditional osteotomy techniques both for leg alignment and tibial slope control. Despite generally researchers paid less attention to functional results after CASosteotomies than to precision of surgical manipulations it is possible of confirm that there is strong tendency to better knee scores after navigation while the difference is not always statistically significant. Rare publications dedicated to long term results favor CAS: 10 years survival rate is 97% that correspond to outcomes of modern total knee arthroplasty. Hence, the current literature confirms the hypothesis of our study and don’t reveal increase of complications rate associated with CAS.

About the authors

P. G. Kochergin

Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics

Author for correspondence.
Email: dr.kochergin2015@yandex.ru

Pavel G. Kochergin – Assistant Researcher of the Knee Pathology Department 

8, ul. Akad. Baykova, St. Petersburg

Russian Federation

N. N. Kornilov

Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics;
Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University

Email: fake@neicon.ru

Nikolai N. Kornilov – Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor of Chair of Traumatology and Orthopaedy, Leading Scientific Worker of the Knee Pathology Department, Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology And Orthopaedics; Associate Professor of Department of Traumatology and Orthopaedics of Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University 

8, ul. Akad. Baykova, St. Petersburg

Russian Federation

T. A. Kulyaba

Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics

Email: fake@neicon.ru

Taras A. Kulyaba – Dr. Sci. (Med.), the Head of The Knee Pathology Department 

8, ul. Akad. Baykova, St. Petersburg

Russian Federation

References

  1. Алексеева Л.И., Цветкова Е.С. Остеоартроз: из прошлого в будущее. Научно-практическая ревматология. 2009;(2):31-37.
  2. Багирова Г.Г., Мейко О.Ю. Остеоартроз: эпидемиология, клиника, диагностика, лечение. М., 2005. 224 с.
  3. Головаха М.Л. Алгоритм дифференцированного лечения остеоартроза коленного сустава. Запорожский медицинский журнал. 2011;(4):16-19.
  4. Кавалерский Г.М., Мурылев В.Ю., Рукин Я.Л., Середа А.П. Применение компьютерной навигации для тотального эндопротезирования коленного сустава у пациентов с грубыми деформациями механической оси нижней конечности. Кафедра травматологии и ортопедии. 2015;(3):8-12.
  5. Колесников М.А. Лечение гонартроза: современные принципы и подходы. Практическая медицина. 2010;(8):97-99.
  6. Корж Н.А., Головаха М.Л., Орляндский В. Повреждения хряща коленного сустава. Запорожье : Просвита, 2013. 128 с.
  7. Корнилов Н.Н., Куляба Т.А., Игнатенко В.Л., Петухов А.И. Использование компьютерной навигации при тотальной артропластике коленного сустава. В кн.: Артропластика коленного сустава. СПб., 2012. с. 175-180.
  8. Корнилов Н.Н., Куляба Т.А., Тихилов Р.М. и др. Компьютерная навигация при тотальном замещении коленного сустава. Эндопротезирование в России. Вып. 4. Казань ; СПб., 2008. С. 175-180.
  9. Корнилов Н.Н., Куляба Т.А., Филь А.С., Муравьева Ю.В. Данные регистра эндопротезирования коленного сустава РНИИТО им. Р.Р. Вредена за 2011–2013 годы. Травматология и ортопедия России. 2015;(1):137-152.
  10. Макушин В.Д., Чегуров В.К., Гордиевских Н.И. Динамика внутрикостного давления при лечении гонартроза. Гений ортопедии. 2003;(4):101-113.
  11. Малышев Е.Е., Павлов Д.В., Блинов С.В. Динамический контроль угловых деформации в коленном суставе. Новые технологии в травматологии и ортопедии. 2013;(3):136-142.
  12. Мюллер B. Высокая остеотомия большеберцовой кости: условия, показания, техника, проблемы, результаты. Margo Anterior. 2003;(1-2):2-10.
  13. Орлянский В., Головаха М.Л., Шабус Р. Корригирующие остеотомии в области коленного сустава. Днепропетровск: Пороги, 2009. 160 с.
  14. Петухов А.И., Корнилов Н.Н., Куляба Т.А., Тихилов Р.М. Анализ пространственного расположения компонентов эндопротеза коленного сустава и ранние функциональные результаты эндопротезирования с использованием компьютерной навигации. Вестник травматологии и ортопедии им. Н.Н. Приорова. 2009;(3):51-55.
  15. Петухов А.И., Корнилов Н.Н., Куляба Т.А., Тихилов Р.М. Осложнения при использовании компьютерной навигации во время тотальной артропластики коленного сустава. Травматология и ортопедия России. 2009;(3):161-163.
  16. Петухов А.И., Корнилов Н.Н., Куляба Т.А., Тихилов Р.М. Тотальное эндопротезирование коленного сустава у больных с посттравматическим гонартрозом: возможности компьютерной навигации. Травматология и ортопедия России. 2010;(1):115-123.
  17. Стаценко О.А., Волна О.А., Ардашев И.П., Плотников Г.А. Комплексное лечение деформаций коленного сустава. В кн.: Тезисы докладов VII съезда травматологовортопедов России. Новосибирск, 2002. 528 с.
  18. Bae D.K., Song S.J., Yoon K.H. Closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy using computer-assisted surgery compared to the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91(9): 1164-1171. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B9.22058.
  19. Bae D.K., Song S.J., Kim H.J., Seo J.W. Change in limb length after high tibial osteotomy using computerassisted surgery: a comparative study of closed-andopenwedge osteotomies. Knee Surgical Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy. 2013;21(1):120-126. doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-1898-5.
  20. Bae D.K., Song S.J., Kim K.I., Hur D., Jeong H.Y. Mid-term survival analysis of closedwedge high tibial osteotomy: A comparative study of computer-assisted andconventional techniques. Knee. 2016;23(2):283-288. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2015.10.005.
  21. Cameron H.U., Botsford D.J., Park Y.S. Prognostic factors in the outcome ofsupracondylar femoral osteotomy for lateral compartment osteoarthritis of the knee. Can J Surg. 1997;40(2):114-118.
  22. Chang J., Scallon G., Beckert M., Zavala J., Bollier M., Wolf B., Albright J. Comparing the accuracy of high tibial osteotomies between computer navigation and conventional methods. Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon). 2017;22(1):1-8. doi: 10.1080/24699322.2016.1271909.
  23. Coventry M.B., Ilstrup D.M., Wallrichs S.L. Proximal tibial osteotomy. A critical long-term study of eightyseven cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75(2):196-201.
  24. Coventry M.B. Osteotomy of upper portion of the tibia for degenerative arthritis of the knee. A preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1965;47:984-990.
  25. Coventry M.B. Upper tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67(7):1136-1140.
  26. Dahl M.T. Preoperative planning in deformity correction and limb lengthening surgery. Instr Course Lect. 2000;49:503-509.
  27. Decking R., Markmann Y., Fuchs J., Puhl W., Scharf H.P. Leg axis after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial comparing computernavigated and manual implantation. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20(3):282-290.
  28. Gebhard F., Krettek C., Hufner T., Grutzner P.A., Stockle U., Imhoff A.B., Lorenz S., Ljungqvist J., Keppler P., AO CSEG. Reliability of computer-assisted surgery as an intraoperative ruler in navigated high tibial osteotomy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011;131(3):297-302. doi: 10.1007/s00402-010-1145-9.
  29. Goleski P., Warkentine B., Lo D., Gyuricza C., Kendoff D., Pearle A.D. Reliability of navigated lower limb alignment in high tibial osteotomies. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(11):2179-2186. doi: 10.1177/0363546508319314.
  30. Hankemeier S., Hufner T., Wang G., Kendoff D., Zeichen J., Zheng G., Krettek C. Navigated open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: advantages and disadvantages compared to the conventional technique in a cadaver study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14(10):917-921. doi: 10.1007/s00167-006-0035-8.
  31. Hankemeier S., Hufner T., Wang G., Kendoff D., Zheng G., Richter M., Gosling T., Nolte L., Krettek C. Navigated intraoperative analysis of lower limb alignment. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2005;125(8):531-535. doi: 10.1007/s00402-005-0038-9.
  32. Hofmann S., Lobenhoffer P., Staubli A., Van Heerwarden R. Osteotomies of the knee joint in patients with monocompartmental arthritis. Orthopade. 2009;38(8): 755-769; quiz 770 (in German). doi: 10.1007/s00132-009-1458-y.
  33. Insall J., Shoji H. High tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the knee: a changing concept. Int Surg. 1976;61(1):11-14.
  34. K awakami H., Sugano N., Yonenobu K., Yoshikawa H., Ochi T., Hattori A., Suzuki N. Effects of rotation on measurement of lower limb alignment for knee osteotomy. J Orthop Res. 2004;22(6):1248-1253. doi: 10.1016/j.orthres.2004.03.016.
  35. K im S.J., Koh Y.G., Chun Y.M., Kim Y.C., Park Y.S., Sung C.H. Medial opening wedge high-tibial osteotomy using a kinematic navigation system versus a conventional method: a 1-year retrospective, comparative study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17(2):128-134. doi: 10.1007/s00167-008-0630-y.
  36. Lobenhoffer P. Importance of osteotomy around to the knee for medial gonarthritis. Indications, technique and results. Orthopade. 2014;43(5):425-431. doi: 10.1007/s00132-013-2189-7.
  37. Lutzner J., Gross A.F., Gunther K.P., Kirschner S. Precision of navigated and conventional open-wedge high tibial osteotomy in a cadaver study. Eur J Med Res. 2010;30;15(3):117-120.
  38. Na Y.G., Eom S.H., Kim S.J., Chang M.J., Kim T.K. The use of navigation in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy can improve tibial slope maintenance and reduce radiation exposure. Int Orthop. 2016;40(3):499-507. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2880-x.
  39. Oakley S.P., Lassere M.N. A critical appraisal of quantitative arthroscopy as an outcome measure in osteoarthritis of the knee. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2003;33(2):83-105.
  40. Pearle A.D., Goleski P., Musahl V., Kendoff D. Reliability of image-free navigation to monitor lower-limb alignment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(Suppl 1):90-94. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01439.
  41. Ribeiro C.H., Severino N.R., Moraes de Barros Fucs P.M. Opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: navigation system compared to the conventional technique in a controlled clinical study. Int Orthop. 2014;38(8):1627-1631. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2341-y.
  42. Saragaglia D., Blaysat M., Mercier N., Grimaldi M. Results of forty two computer-assisted double level osteotomies for severe genu varum deformity. Int Orthop. 2012;36(5):9991003. doi: 10.1007/s00264-011-1363-y.
  43. Saragaglia D., Massfelder J., Refaie R., Rubens-Duval B., Mader R., Rouchy R.C., Pailhe R. Computer-assisted total knee replacement after medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: medium-term results in a series of ninety cases. Int Orthop. 2016;40(1):35-40. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2791-x.
  44. Saragaglia D., Mercier N., Colle P.E. Computer-assisted osteotomies for genu varum deformity: which osteotomy for which varus. Int Orthop. 2010;34(2):185-190. doi: 10.1007/s00264-009-0757-6.
  45. Saragaglia D., Roberts J. Navigated osteotomies around the knee in 170 patients with osteoarthritis secondary to genu varum. Orthopedics. 2005;28(10 Suppl): s1269-1274.
  46. Schroter S., Ihle C., Elson D., Dobele S., Stockle U., Ateschrang A. Surgical accuracy in high tibial osteotomy: coronal equivalence of computer navigation and gap measurement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24(11):3410-3417. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-3983-7.
  47. Sikorski J.M., Chauhan S. Computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery: do we need CAOS? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85(3):319-323.
  48. Song E.K., Seon J.K., Park S.J., Seo H.Y. Navigated open wedge high tibial osteotomy. Sports Med Arthrosc. 2008;16(2):84-90. doi: 10.1097/JSA.0b013e318172b547.
  49. Stanley J.C., Robinson K.G., Devitt B.M., Richmond A.K., Webster K.E., Whitehead T.S., Feller J.A. Computer assisted alignment of opening wedge high tibial osteotomy provides limited improvement of radiographic outcomes compared to fluoroscopic alignment. Knee. 2016;23(2):289-294. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2015.12.006.
  50. Sternheim A., Garbedjan S., Backstein D. Distal femoral varus osteotomy: unloading the lateral compartment: longterm follow-up of 45 medial closing wedge osteotomies. Orthopedics. 2011;34(9):e488-490. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20110714-37.
  51. Wang G., Zheng G., Gruetzner P.A., Mueller-Alsbach U., von Recum J., Staubli A., Nolte L.P. A fluoroscopy-based surgical navigation system for high tibial osteotomy. Technol Health Care. 2005;13(6):469-483.
  52. Yamamoto Y., Ishibashi Y., Tsuda E., Tsukada H., Kimura Y., Toh S. Validation of computer-assisted open-wedge high tibial osteotomy using three-dimensional navigation. Orthopedics. 2008;31(10 Suppl 1).
  53. Yan J., Musahl V., Kay J., Khan M., Simunovic N., Ayeni O. Outcome reporting following navigated high tibial osteotomy of the knee: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24(11):3529-3555. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4327-3.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c)


СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 82474 от 10.12.2021.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies