ANKLE JOINT REPLACEMENT (REVIEW)

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Ankle joint replacement remains the most promising but at the same time one of the most challenging fields of orthopedics. In this article the authors analyzed the history of ankle joint replacement development with meticulous details of the prosthesis structure as well as complications occurring with different generations of the prosthesis. Major tendencies of development and improvements of the prosthesis are described while taking into account the complicated biomechanics of the ankle joint. Based on the completed analysis the conclusion was made that using new materials in combination with improved structure allows for major improvements in the ankle joint replacement.

About the authors

A. V. Stoyanov

ФГУ «Российский научно-исследовательский институт травматологии и ортопедии им. Р.Р. Вредена» Минздравсоцразвития России

Author for correspondence.
Email: stoyanoff@mail.ru
к.м.н., научный сотрудник отделения восстановительной хирургии конечностей Russian Federation

V. G. Emelyanov

ФГУ «Российский научно-исследовательский институт травматологии и ортопедии им. Р.Р. Вредена» Минздравсоцразвития России

Email: fake@neicon.ru
к.м.н., заведующий отделением № 19 Russian Federation

D. G. Pliev

ФГУ «Российский научно-исследовательский институт травматологии и ортопедии им. Р.Р. Вредена» Минздравсоцразвития России

Email: fake@neicon.ru
к.м.н., врач травматолог-ортопед отделения № 19 Russian Federation

K. S. Mikhaylov

ФГУ «Российский научно-исследовательский институт травматологии и ортопедии им. Р.Р. Вредена» Минздравсоцразвития России

Email: fake@neicon.ru
клинический ординатор Russian Federation

References

  1. Анисимов, И.Н. Клинические и биомеханические аспекты функционально-стабильного чрескостного остеосинтеза сложных повреждений голеностопного сустава : автореф. дис. … канд. мед. наук / Анисимов И.Н. – Ставрополь, 1994. – 23 с.
  2. Головаха, М.Л. К методике разработки элементов крепления эндопротезов (на примере голеностопного сустава) / М.Л. Головаха // Ортопед., травматол. – 1994. – № 4. – С. 101–124.
  3. Комплексное лечение переломов голеностопного сустава в постиммобилизационном периоде с помощью нетрадиционных методов физиотерапии : методические рекомендации / сост. А.И. Анисимов [и др.]. – Л. : б/и, 1989. – 11 с.
  4. Лоскутов, А.Е. Первый опыт тотального эндопротезирования голеностопного сустава / А.Е. Лоскутов // Ортопед., травматол. – 1993. – № 3. – С. 14–16.
  5. Bartel, D.L. The effect of conformity and plastic thickness on contact stresses in metal-backed plastic implants / D.L. Bartel, A.H. Burstein, M.D. Toda, D.L. Edwards // J. Biomech. Eng. – 1985. – Vol. 107. – P. 193–199.
  6. Bauer, G. Total ankle replacement. Review and critical analysis of the current status / G. Bauer [et al.] // Foot Ankle Surg. – 1996. – Vol. 2. – P. 119–126.
  7. Bolton-Maggs, B.G. Total ankle arthroplasty. A longterm review of the London Hospital experience / B.G. Bolton-Maggs, R.A. Sudlow, M.A. Freeman // J. Bone Joint Surg. – 1985. – Vol. 67-B. – P. 785–790.
  8. Bouerne, R.B. Pylon Fractures of the distal tibia / R.B. Bouerne // Clin. Orthop. – 1989. – N 240. – P. 42–46.
  9. Buchholz, H. Totale sprunggelenkendoprothese modell "St. Georg" / H. Buchholz, E. Engelbrecht, A. Siegel // Chirurg. – 1973. – Bd. 44. – S. 241–244.
  10. Buechel, F.F. New Jersey low contact stress total ankle replacement: Biomechanical rationale and review of 23 cementless cases / F.F. Buechel, M.G. Pappas, L.J. Jorio // Foot Ancle. – 1988. – Vol. 8, N 5. – P. 279–281.
  11. Buechel, F.F. Survivorship and clinical evaluation of cementless, meniscal-bearing total ankle replacements / F.F. Buechel, M.J. Pappas // Semin Arthroplasty. – 1992. – Vol. 3. – P. 43–50.
  12. Burge, P.D. Effect of surface replacement arthroplasty on stability of the ankle / P.D. Burge, M. Evans // Foot Ankle. – 1986. – Vol. 7. – P. 10–17.
  13. Calderale, P.M. Methodology concerning biomechanical problems of human load bearing joints / P.M. Calderale // Acta Med. Rom. – 1978. – Vol. 4, N 9. – P. 567–573.
  14. Calderale, P.M. Biomechanical design of the total ankle prothesis / P.M. Calderale [et al.] // Eng. Med. – 1983. – Vol. 1, N 4. – P. 69–70.
  15. Calhoun, J.H. A comprehensive study of pressure distribution in the ankle joint with inversion and eversion / J.H. Calhoun, F. Li, B.R. Ledbetter, S.F. Viegas // Foot Ankle Int. – 1994. – Vol. 15. – P. 125–133.
  16. Deland, J.T. Biomechanics of the ankle joint. A perspective on total ankle replacement / J.T. Deland, G.D. Morris, I.H. Sung // Foot Ankle Clin. – 2000. – Vol. 5. – P. 747–759.
  17. Demetriades, L. Osteoarthritis of the ankle / L. Demetriades, E. Strauss, J. Gallina // Clin. Orthop. – 1998. – N 349. – P. 28–42.
  18. Demottaz, J.D. Clinical study of total ankle replacement with gait analysis / J.D. Demottaz [et al.] // J. Bone Joint Surg. – 1979. – Vol. 61-A. – P. 976–988.
  19. Dini, A.A. Evaluation of the early result of Smith total ankle replacement / A.A. Dini, F.H. Bassett III // Clin. Orthop. – 1980. – N 146. – P. 228-230.
  20. Ericson, M.O. The forces of ankle joint structures during ergometer cycling / M.O. Ericson [et al.] // Foot Ankle. – 1985. – Vol. 6, N 3. – P. 135–142.
  21. Harry, E. Salvage procedures for complications of total ankle arthroplasty / E. Harry, M.D. Groth, H.F. Fitch // Clin. Orthop. – 1987. – N 224. – P. 45–49.
  22. Hintermann, B. Mid- to long-term survivorship of Hintegra total ankle / B. Hintermann, A. Barg. Paper N 68. Presented at the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 76th Annual Meeting. Feb. 25–27, 2009. Las Vegas.
  23. Hamblen, D.L. Can the ankle joint be replaced? / D.L. Hamblen //J. Bone Joint. Surg. – 1985. – Vol. 67-B, N 5. – P. 316–318.
  24. Hansen, S.T. Long-term complications of ankle arthrodesis – a survey / S.T. Hansen // Current status of ankle arthroplasty. – Beriln : Springer, 1998. – P. 129–131.
  25. Inman, V.T. The joints of the ankle / V.T. Inman. – Baltimore, 1976.
  26. Kitaoka, H.B. Survivorship analysis of the Mayo total ankle arthroplasty / H.B. Kitaoka, H.L. Patzer, D.M. Ilstrup, S.L. Wallrichs // J. Bone Joint Surg. – 1994. – Vol. 76, N 7. – P. 974–979.
  27. Kitaoka, H.B. Clinical results of the Mayo total ankle arthroplasty / H.B. Kitaoka, G.L. Patzer // J. Bone Joint Surg. – 1996. – Vol. 78, N 11. – P. 1658–1664.
  28. Kofoed, H. Current status of ankle arthroplasty / H. Kofoed. – Berlin : Springer, 1998. – 157 p.
  29. Kofoed, H. Biological fixation of ankle arthroplasty / H. Kofoed, L. Danborg // Foot. – 1995. – Vol. 5. – P. 27–31.
  30. Kofoed, H. Meniscal-bearing ankle arthoplasty is stable. In vivo analysis using stabilometry / H. Kofoed, L. Garde // Foot Ankle Surg. – 1966. – Vol. 2, N 3. – P. 137–143.
  31. Kofoed, H. Ankle arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis: prospective long-term study of cemented replacements / H. Kofoed, T.S. Sorensen // J. Bone Joint Surg. – 1998. – Vol. 80-B. – P. 328–332.
  32. Kirkup, J. Richard Smith ankle arthroplasty / J. Kirkup // J. R. Soc. Med. – 1985. – Vol. 78, N 4. – P. 301–304.
  33. Lachiewicz, P.F. Total ankle replacement in rheumatoid arthritis / P.F. Lachiewicz, A.E. Inglis, C.S. Ranawat // J. Bone Joint Surg. – 1984. – Vol. 66-A, N 3. – P. 340–343.
  34. Lachiewicz, P.F. Total ankle arthroplasty. Indications, techniques, and results / P.F. Lachiewicz // Orthop. Rev. – 1994. – Vol. 23, N 4. – P. 315–320.
  35. Leardini, A. Geometry and mechanics of the human ankle complex and ankle prosthesis design / A. Leardini // Clin. Biomech. – 2001. – Vol. 16. – P. 706–709.
  36. Lord, G. L’arthroplastie totale de cheville / G. Lord, J.H. Marotte // Rev. Chir. Orthop. – 1980. – Vol. 66, N 6. – P. 527–530.
  37. Matejczyk, M.B. Ankle implant systems: Laboratory evaluation and clinical correlation / M.B. Matejczyk, A.S. Greenwald, J.D. Black // Orthop. Trans. – 1979. – Vol. 3, N 15. – P. 199–200.
  38. Mazur, J. Ankle arthrodesis: long-term follow-up with gait analysis / J. Mazur, E. Schwartz, S. Simon // J. Bone Joint Surg. – 1979. – Vol. 61-A. – P. 976–988.
  39. McGuire, M.R. Comparative analysis of ankle arthroplasty versus ankle arthrodesis / M.R. McGuire [et al.] // Clin. Orthop. – 1988. – N 226. – P. 74–81.
  40. Newton, S.E. Total ankle arthroplasty: clinical study of fifty cases / S.E. Newton // J. Bone Joint Surg. – 1982. – Vol. 64-A, N 1. – P. 104–111.
  41. Newton, S.E. Total ankle arthroplasty / S.E. Newton // Disorders of the foot and ankle. – Philadelphia : Saunders, 1982. – P. 816–825.
  42. Pyevich, M.T. Total ankle arthroplasty: a unique design. Two to twelveyear follow-up / M.T. Pyevich, C.L. Saltzman, J.J. Callaghan, F.G. Alvine // J. Bone Joint Surg. – 1998. – Vol. 80-A. – P. 1410–1420.
  43. Richard, N. Salvage of painful total ankle arthroplasty / N. Richard, M.D. Stauffer // Clin. Orthop. – 1982. –N 170. – P. 39–42.
  44. Samuelson, K.M. Development and evolution of the ICLH ankle replacement / K.M. Samuelson, M.A. Freeman, M.A. Tuke // Foot Ankle. – 1982. – Vol. 3, N 1. – P. 32–36.
  45. Sarrafian, S.K. Anatomy of foot and ankle / S.K. Sarrafian. – Philadelphia : Lippincott, 1994. – 2nd ed. – P. 239–240.
  46. Scholz, K.C. Total ankle arthroplasty using biological fixation components compared to ankle arthrodesis / K.C. Scholz // Orthopedics. – 1987. – Vol. 10, N 1. – P. 125–131.
  47. Siemsen, C.H. Systematic der Entwieklung einer Endoprothese von der Planung Sprunggelenkendoprothese / C.H. Siemsen // Biomed. Tech. – Bd. 26, N 1–2. – S. 19–27.
  48. Spector, E. Ankle implants / E. Spector // Clin. Pod. – 1984. – Vol. 1. – P. 225–235.
  49. Stauffer, R.N. Force and motion analysis of the normal, diseased, and prosthetic ankle joint / R.N. Stauffer, E.Y.S. Chao, R.C. Brewster // Clin. Orthop. – 1977. – N 127. – P. 189–196.
  50. Stauffer, R.N. Total ankle arthroplasty. Four year of experience / R.N. Stauffer, N.M. Segal // Clin. Orthop. – 1981. – N 160. – P. 217–219.
  51. Takakura, Y. Ankle arthroplasty. A comparative study of cemented metal and uncemented ceramic prostheses / Y. Takakura [et al.] // Clin. Orthop. – 1990. – N 252. – P. 209–216.
  52. Thabe, H. Die endoprothetishe Versorgung des oberen Sprun ggelenkes bei Rheumatoider / H. Thabe // Arthr. Akt. Rheumatol. – 1987. – Bd. 12, N 9. – P. 48–56.
  53. Tomeno, B. Que faut-on penser de l’arthroplastic de cheville? / B. Tomeno, M. Cornic // Rev. Chir. Orthop. – 1981. – T. 67, N 13. – P. 141–145.
  54. Truger, D. Zwischenuntersuchungebrgebnisse bei 5 Sprungelenksprothesen vom Typ St. Georg / D. Truger // Unfallheilkunde. – 1981. – Bd. 84, N 9. – S. 390–392.
  55. Unger, A.S. Total ankle arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis: a long-term follow-up study / A.S. Unger [et al.] // Foot Ankle. – 1988. – Vol. 8, N 4. – P. 173–179.
  56. Waugh, T.R. Irvine ankle arthroplasty. Prosthetic design and surgical technique / T.R. Waugh, P.M. Evanski, W.C. McMaster // Clin. Orthop. – 1976. – N 114. – P. 180–184.
  57. Wynn, A.H. Long-term follow-up of the Conaxial (Beck-Steffee) total ankle arthroplasty / A.H. Wynn, A.H. Wilde // Foot Ankle. – 1992. – Vol. 13, N 6. – P. 303–306.
  58. Zych, G. Total ankle replacement. A new approach to an old problem / G. Zych, W. Mnaymneh // J. Florida Med. Assoc. – 1979. – Vol. 66, N 1. – P. 96–100.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c)


СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 82474 от 10.12.2021.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies