THE WAYS OF BONE DEFECTS COMPENSATION IN REVISION KNEE ARTHROPLASTY

T. A. Kulyaba; Куляба Т. А.; N. N. Kornilov; Корнилов Н. Н.; A. V. Selin; Селин А. В.; V. I. Razorenov; Разорёнов В. Л.; I. I. Kroitoru; Кроитору И. И.; A. I. Petukhov; Петухов А. И.; A. V. Kazemirsky; Каземирский А. В.; Ph. Yu. Zasulsky; Засульский Ф. Ю.; V. I. Ignatenko; Игнатенко В. Л.; A. V. Saraev; Сараев А. В.

doi:10.21823/2311-2905-2011-0-3-5-12

THE WAYS OF BONE DEFECTS COMPENSATION IN REVISION KNEE ARTHROPLASTY

Authors: Kulyaba T.A.¹, Kornilov N.N.¹, Selin A.V.¹, Razorenov V.I.¹, Kroitoru I.I.¹, Petukhov A.I.¹, Kazemirsky A.V.¹, Zasulsky P.Y.¹, Ignatenko V.I.¹, Saraev A.V.¹
Affiliations:
1. ФГБУ «Российский научно-исследовательский институт травматологии и ортопедии им. Р.Р. Вредена» Минздравсоцразвития России
Issue: Vol 17, No 3 (2011)
Pages: 5-12
Section: Clinical studies
URL: https://journal.rniito.org/jour/article/view/453
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21823/2311-2905-2011-0-3-5-12
ID: 453

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract
About the authors
References
Supplementary files
Statistics

Abstract

During 83 revision TKA we found out the need of bone defect compensation in 93,3% of cases. The autologic bone was used in 12 (7,5%) patients, spongeous allograft in 45 (28,1%), femoral head allograft in 10 (6,3%), structural allograft in 22 (13,8%), femoral or tibial sleeves in 17 (10,6%) and femoral or tibial augmentation blocks in 50 (31,3%). Middle-term results of revision TKA (27 months in average) were evaluated in 57 (68,7%) patients using KSS and WOMAC scores. Positive results were achieved in 48 (84,2%) patients. In 9 (10,8%) cases deep infection developed in different periods of time after surgery. Hence during revision TKA the surgeon should be ready to use different methods of bone defect compensation.

Keywords

knee joint, revision arthroplasty, bone defects

References

Корнилов Н.Н. Эндопротезирование коленного сустава / Н.Н. Корнилов, Т.А. Куляба, К.А. Новоселов. – СПб. : Гиппократ, 2006. – 176 с.
Еngh, G.A. Revision total knee arthroplasty / G.A. Еngh, C.H. Rorabeck. – Philadelphia : LippincottRaven, 1997. – 459 p.
Jones, R.E. Total knee arthroplasty using the SROM mobile bearing hinge prosthesis / R.E. Jones [et al.] // J. Arthroplasty. – 2001. – Vol. 16. – P. 279–285.
Lotke, P.A. Revision total knee arthroplasty / P.A. Lotke, J.P. Garino. – Philadelphia : Lippincott-Raven, 1999. – 517 p.
Mow, C.S. Structural allografting in revision total knee arthroplasty / C.S. Mow, J.D. Wiedel // J. Arthroplasty. – 1996. – Vol. 11. – P. 235–241.
Pagnano, M.W. Tibial wedge augmentation for bone deficiency in total knee arthroplasty / M.W. Pagnano, R.T. Trousdale, G.A. Rand // Clin. Orthop. – 1995. – N 321. – P. 151–155.
Rand, J.A. Modular augments in revision total knee arthroplasty. // Orthop. Clin. North. Am. – 1998. – Vol. 29. – P. 347–353.
Scuderi, G.R. Revision total knee arthroplasty: How much constrain is enough? / G.R. Scuderi // Clin. Orthop. – 2001. – N 392. – P. 300–395.
Stulberg, S.D. Bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty: graft options and adjuncts / S.D. Stulberg // J. Arthroplasty. – 2003. – Vol. 18. (suppl. 3). – P. 48–56.
Yong, I. Preoperative planning for revision TKA: where do you want to go today? / I. Yong, T.P. Schmalzried // Orthopedics. – 2006. – Vol. 29. – P. 844–846.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files

Action

1. JATS XML

Download

Username
Password
Remember me

Forgot password?	Register

Username
Password
Remember me

Forgot password?	Register

THE WAYS OF BONE DEFECTS COMPENSATION IN REVISION KNEE ARTHROPLASTY

Full Text

Abstract

Keywords

About the authors

References

Supplementary files

This website uses cookies