PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURES AFTER JOINT REPLACEMENT: A UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM

Cover Page


Cite item

Abstract

Periprosthetic fracture associated with joint replacement is a common reason for revision arthroplasty and is increasing. Establishing universal principles of management is essential for good outcomes and a classification system that not only classifies, but offers these principles, is critical to achieve this. The Vancouver Classification System (VCS) for periprosthetic fractures involving total hip arthroplasty is validated across North America and Europe. It does not, however, consider other periprosthetic fractures in different joints. The Unified Classification System (UCS) was developed to incorporate the classification and treatment principles of all periprosthetic fractures in any anatomic location. The system is based on the simple mnemonic “ABCDEF” which corresponds to fractures characterized by the following anatomic descriptors: 1) apophyseal; 2) bed of the implant; 3) clear of the implant; 4) dividing the bone between two arthroplasties; 5) each of two bones supporting one arthroplasty; 6) facing and articulating with an implant. Initial validation for the UCS shows substantial and near-perfect inter and intra-observer agreement. Given this performance, it has the potential to evolve into the gold standard classification system for periprosthetic fractures in any joint that they occur.

About the authors

Lisa C. Howard

University of British Columbia Complex Joint Clinic

Author for correspondence.
Email: lchoward25@gmail.com

Department of Orthopaedics

Clinical and Research Fellow, Division of Adult Hip and Knee Reconstruction

2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC V5Z1M9

Canada

Clivе P. Duncan

University of British Columbia Complex Joint Clinic

Email: fake@neicon.ru

Department of Orthopaedics

Professor and Emeritus Chair

2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC V5Z1M9

Canada

References

  1. The Swedish Hip Registry. Available from: http://www. shpr.se/Libraryies/Documents/Årsrapport_2011_eng_ webb.sflb.ashx.
  2. Australian National Joint Replacement Registry. Available from: https://aoanjrr.sahmri.com/documents/ 10180/275066/Hip%2C Knee %26 Shoulder Arthroplasty.
  3. 14th Annual Report National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man Available from: http://www.njrreports.org.uk/Portals/0/PDFdownloads/ NJR 14th Annual Report 2017.pdf.
  4. Brady O.H., Garbuz D.S., Masri B.A., Duncan C.P. The reliability and validity of the Vancouver classification of femoral fractures after hip replacement. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15(1):59-62.
  5. Duncan C.P., Masri B.A. Fractures of the femur after hip replacement. Instr Course Lect. 1995;44:293-304.
  6. Rayan F., Dodd M., Haddad F.S. European validation of the Vancouver classification of periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90(12): 1576-1579. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B12.20681.
  7. Goldberg V.M., Figgie H.E., Inglis A.E., Figgie M.P., Sobel M., Kelly M., Kraay M. Patellar fracture type and prognosis in condylar total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;(236):115-122.
  8. Windsor R.E., Scuderi G.R., Insall J.N. Patellar fractures in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1989; 4 Suppl:S63-67.
  9. Keating E.M., Haas G., Meding J.B. Patella fracture after post total knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;(416):93-97. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000092992.90435.20
  10. Ortiguera C.J., Berry D.J. Patellar fracture after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84-A(4):532-540.
  11. Vioreanu M.H., Parry M.C., Haddad F.S., Duncan C.P. Field testing the Unified Classification System for periprosthetic fractures of the pelvis and femur around a total hip replacement: an international collaboration. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B(11):1472-1477. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B11.34214.
  12. Van der Merwe J.M., Haddad F.S., Duncan C.P. Field testing the Unified Classification System for periprosthetic fractures of the femur, tibia and patella in association with knee replacement: an international collaboration. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B(12):1669-1673. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B12.34103.
  13. Schütz M., Perka C., Rüedi Th. Periprosthetic fracture management. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag; 2013. 380 p.
  14. Ricci W.M., Bolhofner B.R., Loftus T., Cox C., Mitchell S., Borrelli J. Indirect reduction and plate fixation, without grafting, for periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures about a stable intramedullary implant. Surgical Technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88 Suppl 1 Pt 2:275-282.
  15. Froberg L., Troelsen A., Brix M. Periprosthetic Vancouver type B1 and C fractures treated by locking-plate osteosynthesis: fracture union and reoperations in 60 consecutive fractures. Acta Orthop. 2012;83(6):648-652. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.747925.
  16. Khan T., Grindlay D., Ollivere B.J., Scammell B.E., Manktelow A.R., Pearson R.G. A systematic review of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures. Bone Joint J. 2017;99-B(4 Supple B):17-25. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B4.BJJ-2016-1311.R1.
  17. Berry D.J. Total hip arthroplasty in patients with proximal femoral deformity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;(369):262-272.
  18. Mulay S., Hassan T., Birtwistle S., Power R. Management of types B2 and B3 femoral periprosthetic fractures by a tapered, fluted, and distally fixed stem. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20(6):751-756. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.11.020.
  19. Park M.S., Lim Y.J., Chung W.C., Ham D.H., Lee S.H. Management of periprosthetic femur fractures treated with distal fixation using a modular femoral stem using an anterolateral approach. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24(8):1270-1276. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.07.013.
  20. Abdel M.P., Lewallen D.G., Berry D.J. Periprosthetic femur fractures treated with modular fluted, tapered stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(2):599-603. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2936-4.
  21. Munro J.T., Garbuz D.S., Masri B.A., Duncan C.P. Tapered fluted titanium stems in the management of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(2):590-598. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3087-3.

Copyright (c)



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies