RESULTS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT OF HAGLUND’S DESEASE

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Objectives. The article presents the results assessment of open calcaneal excision compared to percutaneous excision of patients with Haglund’s disease. Materials and methods. Twenty-one patients (26 feet) underwent the surgical treatment during the period from 2010 to 2012. The clinical diagnosis was confirmed by axial load radiography estimated with “Fowler-Philip” and “posterior pitch lines” methods. Eight feet were treated with open calcaneal excision and 18 feet - with percutaneous procedure. The mean duration of follow-up was 21,8 months. Clinical evaluation criteria were deformity and/or bursitis recurrence, tenderness, pain by wearing shoes, return to the sport training, patient satisfaction, presence/absence of major complications. Results. Good results were reported for 21 patients; fair results - for 4 patients; and poor results - for one patient. No significant differences in results depending on the method of intervention have been identified.

About the authors

A. A. Kardanov

European Clinic of Sports Traumatology and Orthopaedics; Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

Author for correspondence.
Email: 5995871@gmail.com
Russian Federation

N. M. Bualy

European Clinic of Sports Traumatology and Orthopaedics

Email: nbuali@emcmos.ru
Russian Federation

V. V. Rusanova

European Clinic of Sports Traumatology and Orthopaedics

Email: zatmenye@mail.ru
Russian Federation

I. S. Nepomyashchiy

European Clinic of Sports Traumatology and Orthopaedics; Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

Email: nis13@yandex.ru
Russian Federation

References

  1. Angerman P. Chronic retrocalcaneal bursitis treated by resection of the calcaneus. Foot and Ankle. 1990; 10:285-287.
  2. Biyani A., Jones D.A. Results of excision of calcaneal prominence. Acta Orthop. Belg. 1993;59(1):45-49.
  3. Brunner J., Anderson J.A., O'Malley M. et al. Physician and patient based outcomes following surgical resection of Haglund's deformity. ActaOrthop. Belg. 2005;71:718-723.
  4. Cazeau C. et al. Chirurgie mini-invasive at percutanee du pied. Sauramps Medical. 2009:207.
  5. Chen C.H., Huang P.J., Chen T.B. et al. Surgical treatment for Haglund's Deformity. Kaohsiung J. Med. Sci. 2001; 17:419-422.
  6. DePrado M., Ripoll P.L., Golano P. Cirurgia percutaneadel pie. Masson. 2005:247-253.
  7. Green A.H., Hass M.I., Tubridy S.P. et al. Calcaneal osteotomy for retrocalcanealexostosis. Clin. Podiatr. Med. Surg. 1991; 8:659-665.
  8. Heneghan M.A., Pavlov H. The Haglund painful heel syndrome. Clin. Orthop. 1984; (187):228-234.
  9. Huber H.M. Prominence of the calcaneus: late results of bone resection. J. Bone Joint Surg. 1992; 74(B):315-316.
  10. Jones D.C., James S.L. Partial calcaneal osteotomy for retrocalcaneal bursitis. Am. J. Sports. Med. 2000; 12:71-72.
  11. Kolodziej P., Glisson R.R., Nunley J.A. Risk of avulsion of the Achilles tendon after partial excision for treatment of insertional tendonitis and Haglund's deformity: a biomechanical study. Foot Ankle Int. 1999; 20:433-437.
  12. Miller A.E., Vogel T.A. Haglund's deformity and the Keck and Kelly osteotomy: a retrospective analysis. J. Foot Surg. 1989; 28:23-29.
  13. Morag G., Maman E., Arbel R. Endoscopic treatment of hind-foot pathology. Arthroscopy. 2003; 19:1-6.
  14. Nesse E., Finsen V. Poor results after resection for Haglund's heel. Analysis of 35 heels in 23 patients after years. Acta.Orthop. Scand. 1994; 65:107-109.
  15. Pauker M., Katz K., Yosipovitch Z. Calcaneal osteotomy for Haglund disease. J. Foot Surg. 1992; 31:588-589.
  16. Sammarco G.J., Taylor A.L. Operative management of Haglund's deformity in the nonathlete: a retrospective study. Foot Ankle Int. 1998; 19:724-729.
  17. Schneider W., Niehus W., Knahr K. Haglund's syndrome: disappointing results following surgery: a clinical and radiographic analysis. Foot Ankle Int. 2000; 21:26-30.
  18. Sella E.J., Caminear D.S., McLarney E.A. Haglund's syndrome. J. Foot Ankle Surg. 1998; 37:110-114.
  19. Stephens M.M. Haglund's deformity and retrocalcaneal bursitis. Orthop. Clin. North. Am. 1994; 25:41-46.
  20. Taylor G.J. Prominence of the calcaneus: is operation justified? J. Bone Joint Surg. 1986; 68(B):467-470.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c)



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 82474 от 10.12.2021.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies