DISTRIBUTION OF MISBELIEFS ABOUT BACK PAIN AMONG MEDICAL STAFF

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The aim of this survey is the analysis of typical misbeliefs distribution about back pain among medical staff. Study design: cross-sectional discreptive study 110 medical professionals took part in this study. 48 of them were medical students (4th and 5th year of education), 62 were licensed medical doctors with ten years of experience in average. All participants were interviewed with special questionnarie containing 36 false statements about the spine and back pain. Every subject was asked to indicate whether he agrees or disagrees with each statement. The rate of incorrectly given answers was 63% in average for physicians (from 22% to 94%) and 60% in average for students (from 36% to 83%). In a small subgroup of neurosurgeons the rate of mistakes was 32% (varied from 11% to 47%). This study gives evidence of the high total level of misbeliefs about back pain among both licensed physicians and medical students. It is likely that majority of physicians do not use modern biopsychosocial model of back pain. Moreover they often act as carriers of irrational beliefs which could have negative influence on long therm effects of back pain.

About the authors

E. A. Cherepanov

OOO «Avro», clinic «Medical Club»

Author for correspondence.
Email: dr.cherepanov@gmail.com
Россия

A. V. Gladkov

Novosibirsk branch of National Academy of retraining and professional development of executives and specialists of investment sphere

Email: avg48@mail.ru
Россия

References

  1. Abenhaim L., Suissa S., Rossignol M. Risk of recurrence of occupational back pain over three years follow-up . Br J Ind Med. 1998; 45:829-833.
  2. Buchbinder R., Jolley D. Effects of a media campaign on back beliefs is sustained 3 years after its cessation. Spine. 2005; 30:1323-1330.
  3. Burton A. et al. Information and advice to patients with back pain can have a positive effect. A randomised controlled trial of a novel educational booklet in primary care. Spine. 1999; 24:2484-2491.
  4. Coudeyre E. et al. General practitioners' fear-avoidance beliefs influence their management of patients with low back pain. Pain. 2006; 124:330-337.
  5. Coudeyre E. et al. Effect of a simple information booklet on pain persistence after an acute episode of low back pain: a non-randomized trial in a primary care setting. PLoS ONE. 2007; 2:e706.
  6. Deyo R. A. Low back pain. Scientific American. 1998; 279(2):28-33.
  7. Deyo R.A. et al. Overtreating chronic back pain: time to back off? J Am. Board Fam. Med. 2009; 22:62-68.
  8. Deyo R.A. Diagnostic evaluation of LBP: reaching a specific diagnosis is often impossible. Arch Intern Med. 2002; 162:1444- 1447.
  9. Goubert L., Crombez G., De Bourdeaudhuij I. Low back pain, disability and back pain myths in a community sample: prevalence and interrelationships. Eur J Pain. 2004; 8:385-9.
  10. Grotle M., Vollestad N.K., Brox J.I. Clinical course and impact of fear-avoidance beliefs in low back pain: prospective cohort study of acute and chronic low back pain: II. Spine. 2006; 31:1038-1046.
  11. Ihlebaek C., Eriksen H.R. Are the "myths" of low back pain alive in the general Norwegian population? Scand J Public Health. 2003; 31:395-398.
  12. Ihlebaek C., Eriksen H.R. The «myths» of low back pain: status quo in norwegian general practitioners and physiotherapists. Spine. 2004; 29(16) :1818-1822.
  13. Jensen M.C. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in people without back pain. N Engl J Med. 1994; 331:69-73.
  14. Jones S.L., Jones P.K., Katz J. Compliance for low-back pain patients in the emergency department: A randomized trial. Spine. 1988; 13:553-6.
  15. Martin B.I. et al. Are lumbar spine reoperation rates falling with greater use of fusion surgery and new surgical technology? Spine. 2007; 32:2119-2126.
  16. Murphy P.L., Courtney T.K. Low back pain disability: relative costs by antecedent and industry group. Am. J. Ind. Med. 2000; 37:558-571.
  17. Symonds T.L. et al. Absence resulting from low back trouble can be reduced by psychosocial intervention at the work place. Spine. 1995; 20:2738-2745.
  18. Swinkels-Meewisse I.E. et al. Acute low back pain: pain-related fear and pain catastrophizing influence physical performance and perceived disability. Pain. 2006; 120:36-43.
  19. Thomas E. et al. Predicting who develops chronic low back pain in primary care: a prospective study. BMJ. 1999; 318:1662-1667.
  20. Thomas J.S., France C.R. Pain-related fear is associated with avoidance of spinal motion during recovery from low back pain. Spine. 2007; 32:E460- E466.
  21. Waddell G. A new model for the treatment of low-back pain. Spine. 1987; 12:632-644.
  22. Waddell G. et al. A Fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain and disability. Pain. 1993;52:157-68.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c)


СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 82474 от 10.12.2021.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies