EVALUATION OF MIDTERM FUNCTIONAL RESULTS AFTER TOTAL AND UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY WITH DIFFERENT SCORING SYSTEMS

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Using KSS, WOMAC and IKDC score systems the authors evaluated functional results of 64 total (TKA) and unicompartmental (UKA) knee arthroplasties performed in department of knee pathology of Vreden’s Russian Research Institute Travmatology and Orthopaedics from 2001 till 2006. Before joint replacement there was no significant difference in magnitude of performance deficit between both groups. After 5-10 years (7 in average) all patients had similar pain relief but activities of daily living and level of physical performance, including high flexion, were significantly higher in UKA group than TKA. KSS and WOMAC score systems did not reflect this important difference in physical capacities of UKA and TKA patients comparing to IKDC.

About the authors

N. N. Kornilov

The Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics

Author for correspondence.
Email: drkornilov@hotmail.com
Россия

T. A. Kulyaba

The Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics

Email: taraskulyaba@hotmail.com
Россия

R. E. Phedorov

Smolensk Regional Clinical Hospital

Email: fedorov.ruslan.8@mail.ru
Россия

References

  1. Alviar M.J., Olver J., Brand C., Hale T., Khan F. Do patient-reported outcome measures used in assessing outcomes in rehabilitation after hip and knee arthroplasty capture issues relevant to patients? Results of a systematic review and ICF linking process. J. Rehabil. Med. 2011;43(5):374-381.
  2. Anderson A.F., Irrgang J.J., Kocher M.S., Mann B.J., Harrast J.J. International Knee Documentation Committee. The International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form: normative data. Am. J. Sports Med. 2006;34(1):128-135.
  3. Argenson J.N., Chevrol-Benkeddache Y., Aubaniac J.M. Modern unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with cement: a three to ten-year follow-up study. J. Bone Joint Surg. 2002;84-A(12):2235-2239.
  4. Bade M.J., Stevens-Lapsley J.E. Early high-intensity rehabilitation following total knee arthroplasty improves outcomes. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2011; 41(12):932-941.
  5. Basaran S., Guzel R., Seydaoglu G., Guler-Uysal F. Validity, reliability, and comparison of the WOMAC osteoarthritis index and Lequesne algofunctional index in Turkish patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis. Clin. Rheumatol. 2010;29(7):749-756.
  6. Brazier J., Roberts J., Deverill M. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J. Health Econ. 2002;21(2):271-292.
  7. Breivik H., Borchgrevink P.C., Allen S.M., Rosseland L.A., Romundstad L., Hals E.K., Kvarstein G., Stubhaug A. Assessment of pain. Br. J. Anaesth. 2008;101(1):17-24.
  8. Bryant D., Norman G., Stratford P., Marx R.G., Walter S.D., Guyatt G. Patients undergoing knee surgery provided accurate ratings of preoperative quality of life and function 2 weeks after surgery. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2006;59(9):984-993.
  9. Crawford K., Briggs K.K., Rodkey W.G., Steadman J.R. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the IKDC score for meniscus injuries of the knee. Arthroscopy. 2007;23(8):839-844.
  10. Engh G.A., Dwyer K.A., Hanes C.K. Polyethylene wear of metal-backed tibial components in total and unicompartmental knee prostheses. J. Bone Joint Surg. 1992;74-B(1):9-17.
  11. Faik A., Benbouazza K., Amine B., Maaroufi H., Bahiri R., Lazrak N., Aboukal R., Hajjaj-Hassouni N. Translation and validation of Moroccan Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) osteoarthritis index in knee osteoarthritis. Rheumatol. Int. 2008;28(7):677-683.
  12. Greene K.A., Harwin S.F. Maximizing patient satisfaction and functional results after total knee arthroplasty. J. Knee Surg. 2011;24(1):19-24.
  13. Hassaballa M.A., Porteous A.J., Learmonth I.D. Functional outcomes after different types of knee arthroplasty: kneeling ability versus descending stairs. Med. Sci. Monit. 2007;13(2):CR77-81.
  14. Ito H., Matsuno T., Hirayama T., Tanino H., Minami A. Health-related quality of life in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus after medium to long-term follow-up of hip arthroplasty. Lupus. 2007;16(5):318-23.
  15. Kasodekar V.B., Yeo S.J., Othman S. Clinical outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and influence of alignment on prosthesis survival rate. Singapore Med. J. 2006;47(9):796-802.
  16. Kort N.P., van Raay J.J., van Horn J.J. The Oxford phase III unicompartmental knee replacement in patients less than 60 years of age. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2007;15(4):356-360.
  17. Kuptniratsaikul V., Rattanachaiyanont M. Validation of a modified Thai version of the Western Ontario and McMaster (WOMAC) osteoarthritis index for knee osteoarthritis. Clin. Rheumatol. 2007;26(10):1641-1645.
  18. Naal F.D., Fischer M., Preuss A., Goldhahn J., von Knoch F., Preiss S., Munzinger U., Drobny T. Return to sports and recreational activity after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Am. J. Sports Med. 2007;35(10):1688-1695.
  19. Walton N.P., Jahromi I., Lewis P.L., Dobson P.J., Angel K.R., Campbell D.G. Patient perceived outcomes and return to sport and work: TKA versus mini-incision unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J. Knee Surg. 2006;19(2):112-116.
  20. Weale A.E., Halabi O.A., Jones P.W., White S.H. Perceptions of outcomes after unicompartmental and total knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Jan;(382):143-53.
  21. Xie F., Li S.C, Goeree R., Tarride J.E., O'Reilly D., Lo N.N., Yeo S.J., Yang K.Y., Thumboo J. Validation of Chinese Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) in patients scheduled for total knee replacement. Qual. Life Res. 2008;17(4):595-601.
  22. Yang K.G., Raijmakers N.J., Verbout A.J., Dhert W.J, Saris D.B. Validation of the short-form WOMAC function scale for the evaluation of osteoarthritis of the knee. J. Bone Joint Surg. 2007;89-B(1):50-56.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c)


СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 82474 от 10.12.2021.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies