Study Design Guidelines

Cover Page

Abstract

Complying with certain requirements or, more precisely, following the guidelines for the design of a scientific publication helps to make it not only more comprehensible for reviewers and readers, but actually enhances the quality of work. For example, even if some aspects in design logic were fulfilled but not described, other researchers doing meta-analysis may wrongly but for a good reason downgrade such publication and exclude it from the analysis. Understanding of the guidelines for study design ensures not only the proper description of the results but the initial planning of work. The CA RE guidelines were established for reporting of clinical cases, STROBE — for reporting observational studies (cohort and case-control studies), CO NSORT — for reporting randomized studies (these guidelines are often used also for other comparative and case series studies), STARD — for reporting diagnostic studies, and PRISMA — for reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The present paper describes the key aspects of those guidelines and provides templates for graphic display of study design in form of flow charts. Evidently, we should not forget that each study is unique and there is always a place for a reasonable compromise between “requirements” and the real logic of the research in place.

About the authors

A. P. Sereda

Federal Medical and Biological Agency

Author for correspondence.
Email: drsereda@gmail.com

Dr. Sci. (Med.), Deputy Head

Moscow

Russian Federation

M. A. Andrianova

Federal Medical and Biological Agency

Email: fake@neicon.ru

Cand. Sci. (Tech.), Consultant, Department of Health and Industrial Medicine

Moscow

Russian Federation

References

  1. Gagnier J.J., Kienle G., Altman D.G., Moher D., Sox H., Riley D. The CA RE Guidelines: Consensusbased Clinical Case Reporting Guideline Development. Glob Adv Health Med. 2013;2(5):38-43. doi: 10.7453/gahmj.2013.008.
  2. von Elm E., Altman D.G., Egger M., Pocock S.J., Gøtzsche P.C., Vandenbroucke J.P. TROBE Initiative. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ. 2007;335:806-808. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD.
  3. Schulz K.F., Altman D.G., Moher D. CO NSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152(11):726-732. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-11-201006010-00232.
  4. Bossuyt P.M., Reitsma J.B., Bruns D.E., Gatsonis C.A., Glasziou P.P., Irwig L.M. et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. Clin Chem. 2003;49(1):1-6.
  5. Moher D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J., Altman D.G. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med 2009;6(7):e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
  6. Rodrigues L., Kirkwood B.R. Case-control designs in the study of common diseases: updates on the demise of the rare disease assumption and the choice of sampling scheme for controls. Int J Epidemiol. 1990;19(1): 205-213. doi: 10.1093/ije/19.1.205.
  7. Rothman K.J., Greenland S. Case-Control Studies. In: Rothman K.J., Greenland S., eds. Modern epidemiology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia : Lippincott Raven, 1998. pp. 93-114.
  8. Гржибовский А.М. Иванов С.В., Горбатова М.А. Исследования типа «случай-контроль» в здравоохранении. Наука и здравоохранение. 2015;(4):5-17.
  9. Гржибовский A.M., Иванов С.В. Поперечные (одномоментные) исследования в здравоохранении. Наука и здравоохранение. 2015;(2):5-18.
  10. Vandenbroucke J.P., von Elm E., Altman D.G., Gøtzsche P.C., Mulrow C.D., Pocock S.J. et al. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Int J Surg. 2014;12(12):1500-1524. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.014.

Supplementary files

There are no supplementary files to display.

Statistics

Views

Abstract: 616

Cited-by

CrossRef: 7

  1. Lastevsky AD, Lukinov VL, Rerikh VV. Predicting the loss of correction after isolated anterior stabilization in the surgical treatment of subaxial cervical dislocations. Hirurgiâ pozvonočnika (Spine Surgery). 2020;17(3):20. doi: 10.14531/ss2020.3.20-31
  2. Sereda AP, Bogdan VN, Andrianova MA, Berenstein M. Treatment of Periprosthetic Infection: Where and Who?. Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. 2019;25(4):33. doi: 10.21823/2311-2905-2019-25-4-33-55
  3. Trusova AV, Klimanova SG. Reporting randomized trials of psychological and psychosocial interventions: consort-spi 2018. V.M. BEKHTEREV REVIEW OF PSYCHIATRY AND MEDICAL PSYCHOLOGY. 2020;(3):41. doi: 10.31363/2313-7053-2020-3-41-49
  4. Sereda AP, Smetanin SM. Dislocations after Hip Arthroplasty (Review). Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. 2020;26(2):180. doi: 10.21823/2311-2905-2020-26-2-180-200
  5. Timerbulatov MV, Ibragimov DR. Routes to Improve Arteriovenous Fistula Formation for Haemodialysis. Creative surgery and oncology. 2021;11(3):203. doi: 10.24060/2076-3093-2021-11-3-203-208
  6. Sereda AP. Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Natural History. Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. 2020;26(3):182. doi: 10.21823/2311-2905-2020-26-3-182-192
  7. Skryabin EG, Naumov SV, Zotov PB, Akselrov MA. Sternal fractures in children. Pediatric Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery. 2021;9(3):317. doi: 10.17816/PTORS64202

Dimensions

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

PlumX


Copyright (c)



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies