VALIDATION AND CROSS-CULTURAL ADAPTATION OF RATING SYSTEMS WOMAC, KSS AND FJS-12 IN PATIENTS WITH KNEE DISORDERS AND INJURIES

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The purpose of the work — is validation and cultural adaptation of the english-language rating systems for knee function assessment for use in scientific, medical and educational institutions of the Russian Federation.

Materials and Methods. The english versions of rating systems WOMac® 3.1 Index, The knee Society clinical Rating System©, FjS-12® were translated to Russian language by orthopedic surgeon with advanced level of english and the professional translator specializing in the translation of medical texts. Reverse translation was provided by third independent translator born in the english-speaking country (native speaker). a printed version of the various translations of the questionnaires was filled by patients with an interval of two days. The study group included 150 patients with Stage III knee osteoarthritis (90 women and 60 men aged 48 to 75 years, an average of 62.5 years) hospitalized in Vreden Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics from February to april 2017 for total knee arthroplasty.

Results. good and very good retest reliability of WOMac (α = 0.87 and α = 0.9), kSS (α = 0.89 and α = 0.86) and FjS-12 (α = 0.94 and α = 0.96) was revealed. The study revealed a strong correlation between the results of the questionnaires performed by different translators: WOMac (Icc = 0.89), kSS (Icc = 0.86), FjS-12 (Icc = 0.92). The correlation dependence between subsections of WOMac (stiffness – Icc = 0.98, pain – Icc = 0.87, daily functions – Icc = 0.89) and kSS (knee score – Icc = 0.94, function score – Icc = 0.88), which indicates a good constructive validity.

Conclusion. The results of the study of criterial and constructive validity, as well as the retest reliability of the Russian versions of the WOMac, kSS and FjS-12 scales, indicate that they are a reliable and sensitive tool for assessing the function of knee joint, which can be widely used by Russian researchers in practical and scientific activities.

About the authors

A. A. Irzhanski

Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics .

Author for correspondence.
Email: arseni.a.irzhanski@gmail.com
8, ul. Akad. Baykova, 195427, St. Petersburg. Россия

T. A. Kulyaba

Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics .

Email: fake@neicon.ru
8, ul. Akad. Baykova, 195427, St. Petersburg. Россия

N. N. Kornilov

Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics .

Email: fake@neicon.ru
8, ul. Akad. Baykova, 195427, St. Petersburg. Россия

References

  1. Тихилов Р.М., Корнилов Н.Н., Куляба Т.А., Сараев А.В., Игнатенко В.Л. Современные тенденции в ортопедии: артропластика коленного сустава. Травматология и ортопедия России. 2012;(2):5-15. doi: 10.21823/2311-2905-2012–2-5-15
  2. Noble P.C., Conditt M.A., Cook K.F., Mathis K.B. The john Insall award: patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;452:35-43. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000238825.63648.1e.
  3. National joint Register. NjRaNNualRepORT 2016. available at: http://www.njrreports.org.uk/portals/0/pdFdownloads/NjR%2014th%20annual%20Report%202017.pdf.
  4. Корнилов Н.Н., Куляба Т.А. Артропластика коленного сустава. спб.: РнИИТо им. Р.Р. вредена, 2017. с. 7.
  5. Корнилов Н.Н., Куляба Т.А., Филь А.С., Муравьёва Ю.В. Данные регистра эндопротезирования коленного сус тава РнИИТо им. Р.Р. вредена за 2011–2013 годы. Травматология и ортопедия России. 2015;(1):136-151. doi: 10.21823/2311-2905-2015-0-1-136-151.
  6. Gagnier J.J. Patient reported outcomes in orthopaedics. J Orthop Res. 2017;35(10):2098-20108. doi: 10.1002/jor.23604.
  7. Behrend H., Giesinger K., Giesinger J.M., Kuster M.S. The «forgotten joint» as the ultimate goal in joint arthroplasty: validation of a new patient-reported outcome measure. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27(3):430-436.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.06.035.
  8. Suda A.J., Seeger J.B., Bitsch R.G., Krueger M., Clarius M. Are patients’ expectations of hip and knee arthroplasty fulfilled? a prospective study of 130 patients. Orthopedics. 2010;33(2):76-80. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20100104-07.
  9. Becker R., Döring C., Denecke A., Brosz M. Expectation, satisfaction and clinical outcome of patients after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19(9):1433-1441. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1621-y.
  10. Thienpont E., Becker R. Anthropometric measurements of the knee: time to make it fit. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(12):2889-2890. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-3391-9.
  11. Bullens P.H.J., Van Loon C.J.M., De Waal Malefijt M.C., Laan R.F.J.M., Veth R.P.H. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16(6):740-747. doi: 10.1054/arth.2001.23922.
  12. Guillemin F., Bombardier C., Beaton D. Cross-Cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46(12):1417-1432.
  13. Bellamy N., Buchanan W.W., Goldsmith C.H., Campbell J., Stitt L.W. Validation study of WOMac: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988;15(12):1833-1840.
  14. Guermazi M., Poiraudeau S., Yahia M., Mezganni M., Fermanian J., Habib Elleuch M. et al. Translation, adaptation and validation of the Western Ontario and McMaster universities osteoarthritis index (WOMac) for an arab population: the Sfax modified WOMac. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2004;12(6):459-468. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2004.02.006.
  15. Xie F., Li S.C., Goeree R., Tarride J.E., O’Reilly D., Lo N.N. et al. Validation of chinese Western Ontario and McMaster universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMac) in patients scheduled for total knee replacement. Qual Life Res. 2008;17(4):595-601. doi: 10.1007/s11136-008-9340-7.
  16. Roorda L.D., Jones C.A., Waltz M., Lankhorst G.J., Bouter L.M., Van Der Eijken J.W. et al. Satisfactory cross cultural equivalence of the dutch WOMac in patients with hip osteoarthritis waiting for arthroplasty. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63(1):36-42. 2004;63(1):36-42. doi: 10.1136/ard.2002.001784.
  17. Soininen J.V., Paavolainen P.O., Gronblad M.A., Kaapa E.H. Validation study of a Finnish version of the Western Ontario and McMasters university osteoarthritis index. Hip Int. 2008;18(2):108-111. doi: 10.1177/112070000801800207.
  18. Choquette D., Bellamy N., Raynauld J.P. A Frenchcanadian version of the WOMac Osteoarthritis Index. Arthritis Rheum. 1994;37(Suppl 9):S226;
  19. Faucher M., Poiraudeau S., Lefevre-Colau M.M., Rannou F., Fermanian J., Revel M. Algo-Functional assessment of knee osteoarthritis: comparison of the test–retest reliability and construct validity of the Womac and lequesne indexes. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2002;10(8):602-610. doi: 10.1053/joca.2002.0533.
  20. Stucki G., Meier D., Stucki S., Michel B.A., Tyndall A.G., Dick W., Theiler R. [Evaluation of a german version of WOMac (Western Ontario and McMaster universities) arthrosis Index]. Z Rheumatol. 1996;55(1):40-49. (in german).
  21. Wigler I., Neumann L., Yaron M. Validation Study of a Hebrew Version of WOMac in patients with Osteoarthritis of the knee. Clin Rheumatol. 1999;18(5): 402-405. doi: 10.1007/s100670050126.
  22. Salaffi F., Leardini G., Canesi B., Mannoni A., Fioravanti A., Caporali R. et al. Reliability and validity of the Western Ontario and McMaster universities (WOMac) Osteoarthritis Index in Italian patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2003;11(8):551-560. doi: 10.1016/s1063-4584(03)00089-x.
  23. Bae S.-C., Lee H.-S., Yun H.R., Kim T.-H., Yoo D.-H., Kim S.Y. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of korean Western Ontario and McMaster universities (WOMac) and lequesne Osteoarthritis Indices for clinical Research. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2001;9(8): 746-750. doi: 10.1053/joca.2001.0471.
  24. Escobar A., Quintana J.M., Bilbao A., Azkárate J., Güenaga J.I. Validation of the Spanish version of the WOMac questionnaire for patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis. Western Ontario and McMaster universities Osteoarthritis Index. Clin Rheumatol. 2002;21(6):466-471. doi: 10.1007/s100670200117.
  25. Söderman P., Malchau H. Validity and reliability of Swedish WOMac osteoarthritis index: a self-administered disease-specific questionnaire (WOMac) versus generic instruments (SF-36 and NHp). Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71(1):39-46. doi: 10.1080/00016470052943874.
  26. Kuptniratsaikul V., Rattanachaiyanont M. Validation of a modified Thai version of the Western Ontario and McMaster (WOMac) osteoarthritis index for knee osteoarthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2007;26(10):1641-1645. doi: 10.1007/s10067-007-0560-y.
  27. Basaran S., Guzel R., Seydaoglu G., Guler-Uysal F. Validity, reliability, and comparison of the WOMac osteoarthritis index and lequesne algofunctional index in Turkish patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2010;29(7):749-756. doi: 10.1007/s10067-010-1398-2.
  28. Insall J.N., Dorr L.D., Scott R.D., Scott W.N. Rationale of the knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;(248):13-14.
  29. Kim S.J., Basur M.S., Park C.K., Chong S., Kang Y.G., Kim M.J. et al. crosscultural adaptation and Validation of the korean Version of the New knee Society knee Scoring System. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475(6):1629-1639. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5307-8.
  30. Liu D., He X., Zheng W., Zhang Y., Li D., Wang W. et al. Translation and validation of the simplified chinese new knee Society Scoring System. BMC Musculoskelet Dis. 2015;16:391. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0854-1.
  31. Hamamoto Y., Ito H., Furu M., Ishikawa M., Azukizawa M., Kuriyama S., et al. cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the japanese version of the new knee Society Scoring System for osteoarthritic knee with total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci. 2015 Sep;20(5):849-853. doi: 10.1007/s00776-015-0736-2.
  32. Dinjens R.N., Senden R., Heyligers I.C., Grimm B. clinimetric quality of the new 2011 knee Society score: high validity, low completion rate. Knee. 2014;21(3): 647-654. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2014.02.004.
  33. Van Der Straeten C., Witvrouw E., Willems T., Bellemans J., Victor j. Translation and validation of the dutch new knee Society Scoring System©. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(11):3565-3571. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3149-6.
  34. Hamilton D.F., Loth F.L., Giesinger J.M., Giesinger K., Macdonald D.J., Patton J.T. et al. Validation of the english language Forgotten joint Score-12 as an outcome measure for total hip and knee arthroplasty in a British population. Bone Joint J. 2017;99-B(2):218-224. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.99B2.Bjj-2016-0606.R1.
  35. Cao S., Liu N., Han W., Zi Y., Peng F., Li L. et al. Simplified chinese version of the Forgotten joint Score (FjS) for patients who underwent joint arthroplasty: crosscultural adaptation and validation. J Orthop Surg Res. 2017;12:6. doi: 10.1186/s13018-016-0508-5.
  36. Shadid M.B., Vinken N.S., Marting L.N., Wolterbeek N. The dutch version of the Forgotten joint Score: testretesting reliability and validation. Acta Orthop Belg. 2016;82(1):112-118.
  37. Baumann F., Ernstberger T., Loibl M., Zeman F., Nerlich M., Tibesku C. Validation of the german Forgotten joint Score (g-FjS) according to the cOSMIN checklist: does a reduction in joint awareness indicate clinical improvement after arthroplasty of the knee? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016;136(2):257-264. doi: 10.1007/s00402-015-2372-x.
  38. Matsumoto M., Baba T., Homma Y., Kobayashi H., Ochi H., Yuasa T., Behrend H., Kaneko K. Validation study of the Forgotten joint Score-12 as a universal patientreported outcome measure. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015;25(7):1141-1145. doi: 10.1007/s00590-015-1660-z.
  39. Parratte S., Ollivier M., Opsomer G., Lunebourg A., Argenson J.N., Thienpont E. Is knee function better with contemporary modular bicompartmental arthroplasty compared to total knee arthroplasty? Short-term outcomes of a prospective matched study including 68 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015;101(5):547-552. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.03.019.
  40. Бараненков А.А., Голозубов О.М., Голубев В.Г., Голубев Г.Ш., Жданов В.Г. Региональная адаптация шкалы оценки исходов повреждений заболеваний коленного сустава kOOS. Травматология и ортопедия России. 2007;(1):26-32.
  41. Кузнецов И.А., Майков С.В., Салихов М.Р., Шулепов Д.А., Авдеев А.И. Языковая, культурная адаптация и валидация опросника kujala среди пациентов с болями в переднем отделе коленного сустава. Научнопрактическая ревматология. 2017;55(4):388-392. doi: 10.14412/1995-4484-2017-388-392.
  42. Синеокий А.Д., Билык С.С., Близнюков В.В., Ефимов Н.Н., Коваленко А.Н., Бадмаев А.О. Кросскультурная адаптация и валидация русскоязычной версии анкеты OxFORd kNee ScORe для пациентов с гонартрозом, ожидающих выполнения первичного эндопротезирования. Современные проблемы науки и образования. 2017;(2). Режим доступа: http:// science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=26312.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c)


СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 82474 от 10.12.2021.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies