INFLUENCE OF RESIDUAL VARUS DEFORMITY ON CLINICAL, FUNCTIONAL, RADIOLOGICAL AND DYNAMOMETRIC OUTCOMES OF TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY
- Authors: Zinoviev M.P.1, Paskov R.V.1, Rimashevsky D.V.2
-
Affiliations:
- Ural Clinical and Rehabilitation Center
- Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
- Issue: Vol 23, No 1 (2017)
- Pages: 108-116
- Section: Clinical studies
- Submitted: 11.04.2017
- Accepted: 11.04.2017
- Published: 11.04.2017
- URL: https://journal.rniito.org/jour/article/view/696
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.21823/2311-2905-2017-23-1-108-116
- ID: 696
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Purpose of the study – to evaluate the influence of residual varus deformity of the lower leg on clinical, functional and dynamometric outcomes of TKR.
Material and methods. In the period from September 2014 till May 2015 951 total knee replacement surgeries were performed in Ural clinical and rehabilitation center in 933 patients with initial varus deformity of lower limb. However, in 52 cases (5.5%) residual varus deformity of >3° persisted. The main group included 36 patients with mean residual varus deformity of lower leg of 3.9°±0.74° (from 3.1° to 5.6°), the control group included 34 patients with neutral mechanic axis of the lower leg. Evaluation of treatment outcomes was performed on average 14.2±1.8 months after the procedure using functional assessment of the patients according to KSS (Knee Society Score), subjective assessment of life quality (SF36), as well as evaluation of the static-dynamic function of the lower leg on diagnostic and treatment complex Biodex Systems 4 Quick Set and assessment of stability of components fixation by F.C. Ewald scale in modification of O.A. Kudinov et al.
Results. Functional assessment of the patients according to KSS (Knee Society Score) for the main group was 84.0±4.6, in control group – 82.2±4.1 points (p>0.05). Subjective assessment of life quality (SF36) in the main group was 162.6±6.4 points, in control group – 164.3±8.1 points (p>0.05). In terms of flexion and extension of lower leg there were no significant differences between two groups when assessing static and dynamic function by treatment and diagnostic complex «Biodex Systems 4 Quick Set» on average in 14.2±1.8 months after procedure: neither isometric nor isokinetic parameters in both groups demonstrated statistically significant differences (p>0.05). Based on X-rays evaluation there were no abnormalities in components fixation in both groups. There were no statistically significant differences identified in KSS and SF36 scales, dynamometry results and X-ray findings for stability of prosthesis (p>0.05).
Conclusion. The residual varus deformity in the knee of 3.9°±0.74 (from 3.1° to 5.6°) after total knee replacement in the patients with initial varus deformity of lower leg did not affect clinical, functional, X-ray and dynamometric outcomes in 14.2±1.8 months after the replacement.
About the authors
M. P. Zinoviev
Ural Clinical and Rehabilitation Center
Author for correspondence.
Email: max_travma@mail.ru
Maxim P. Zinoviev – Orthopedic Surgeon, Orthopedic Department N 1
55, Uralsky pr., Nizhny Tagil, 622049
РоссияR. V. Paskov
Ural Clinical and Rehabilitation Center
Email: fake@neicon.ru
Паськов Роман Владимирович – доктор медицинских наук главный врач
Уральский пр., д. 55, г. Нижний Тагил, 622049
РоссияD. V. Rimashevsky
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
Email: fake@neicon.ru
Denis V. Rimashevsky – Cand. Sci. (Med.) Associate Professor at Orthopedic Department
6, ul. Miklukho-Maklaya, Moscow, 117198
РоссияReferences
- Верткин А.Л., Наумов А.В., Шакирова С.Р., Зайченко Д.М., Верткин А.Л., Наумов А.В., Шакирова С.Р., Зайченко Д.М. Остеопороз в практике врача. Современная ревматология. 2011;5(2):64-71. doi: 10.14412/1996-7012-2011-672.
- Дедов И.И., Мельниченко Г.А., Романцова Т.И. Стратегия управления ожирением: итоги Всероссийской наблюдательной программы «ПримаВера». Ожирение и метаболизм. 2016;13(1):36-44. doi: 10.14341/OMET2016136-44.
- Корнилов Н.Н., Куляба Т.А., Федоров Р.Э. Сравнительная оценка среднесрочных функциональных исходов одномыщелкового и тотального эндопротезирования коленного сустава с использованием различных балльных систем. Травматология и ортопедия России. 2012;(3):12-20.
- Кудинов О.А., Нуждин В.И., Попова Т.П., Хоранов Ю.Г., Каграманов С.В. Опыт эндопротезирования коленного сустава в специализированом отделении ЦИТО им. Н.Н. Приорова. Вестник травматологии и ортопедии им. Н.Н. Приорова. 2005;(3):16-25.
- Пиманчев О.В., Брижаль Л.К., Грицюк А.А.. Применение длительной CPM-терапии в реабилитации пациентов после тотального эндопротезирования коленного сустава. Вестник национального медико-хирургического центра им. Н.И. Пирогова. 2013;8(2):102-105.
- Цапина Т.Н., Эрдес Ш.Ф., Слизкова К.Ш. Качество жизни больных остеоартрозом. Научно-практическая ревматология. 2004;(2):20-22.
- Abdel M.P., Oussedik S., Parratte S., Lustig S., Haddad F.S. Coronal alignment in total knee replacement: historical review, contemporary analysis, and future direction. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B(7):857-862. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B7.33946.
- Allen M.M., Pagnano M.W. Neutral mechanical alignment is it necessary? Bone Joint J. 2016;98-B(1 Suppl. A):81-83. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B1.36403.
- Berend M.E., Ritter M.A., Meding J.B., Faris P.M., Keating E.M., Redelman R., Faris G.W., Davis K.E. Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;(428):26-34.
- Cawley D.T., Kelly N., McGarry J.P. Cementing techniques for the tibial component in primary total knee replacement. Bone Joint J. 2013;95-B:295-300. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B3.29586.
- Charlson M.E., Pompei P, Ales K.L., McKenzie C.R. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chron Dis. 1987;40(5):373-383.
- Collier M.B., Engh G.A. Factors associated with the loss of thickness of polyethylene tibial bearings after knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2007;89(6):1306-1314.
- Curtin B., Fehring T.K., Lauber J. Errors in Knee Aligmebt Using Fixed Femaral Resection Angles. J Orthopedics. 2014;37(7):644-648. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20140626-56.
- Durandet A., Ricci P.-L., Saveh A.H., Vanat Q., Wang B., Esat I., Chizari M. Radiographic Analysis of lower limb axial alignments. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering. 2013 Vol II, WCE 2013, July 3-5, 2013, London. Режим доступа: http://www.iaeng.org/ publication/WCE2013/WCE2013_pp1354-1358.pdf. (дата обращения: 15.12.2016).
- Eward F.C. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;(248):9-12.
- Fang D.M., Fang, M.I.A. Ritter, K.E. Davis. Coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: just how important is it. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24(6):39-43. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.04.034.
- Green G.V., Berend K.R., Berend M.E., Glisson R.R., Vail T.P. The effects of varus tibial alignment on proximal tibial surface strain in total knee arthroplasty: the posteromedial hot spot. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17(8):1033-1039.
- Insall J.N., Dorr L.D., Scott R.D., Scott W.N. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;(248):13-14.
- Jeffery R.S., Morris R.W., Denham R.A. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73(5):709-714.
- Mahaluxmivala J., Bankes M.J., Nicolai P., Aldam C.H., Allen P.W. The effect of surgeon experience on component positioning in 673 press fit condylar posterior cruciatesacrificing total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16(5):635-640.
- Maniar R.N., Johorey A.C., Pujary C.T., Yadava A.N. Margin of error in alignment: a study undertaken when converting from conventional to computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26(1):82-87. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.11.023.
- Matziolis G., Adam J., Perka C. Varus malalignment has no influence on clinical outcome in midterm follow-up after total knee replacement. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010;130(12):1487-1491. doi: 10.1007/s00402-010-1064-9.
- Miller M.C., Zhang A.X., Anthony B., Petrella J., Richard A., Berger D., Harry E. The effect of component placement on knee kinetics after arthroplasty with an unconstrained prosthesis. J Orthop Res. 2001;19(4):614-620.
- Morgan S.S., Bonshahi A., Pradhan N., Gregory A., Gambhir A., Porter M.L. The influence of postoperative coronal alignment on revision surgery in total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2008;32(5):639-642.
- Whiteside Leo A. Ligament Balancing in Total Knee Arthroplasty: an instructional manual. Berlin, New York : Springer, 2004. 115 p.