COMBINED FEMORAL FIXATION TECNIQUE IN HAMSTRING TENDON ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION: ASESSMENT OF TUNNEL WIDENING

Cover Page


Cite item

Abstract

Purpose – to assess the influence of combined femoral fixation technique during arthroscopic ACL reconstruction on the femoral tunnel widening at long term follow-up.

Material and methods. 99 patients with primary hamstring tendon (HT) ACL reconstruction performed in 2007-2008 were analyzed. In the study group (42 patients) on the femoral side a combined cortical suspension (Endobutton CL, Smith & Nephew) and transverse (Rigid Fix, Depuy Mitek) fixation of graft was used. In control group, isolated cortical suspension fixation (Endobutton CL, Smith & Nephew) was used. On the tibial side for graft fixation a biodegradable screw (Biointrafix, DePuy Mitek) was used in all cases. Tunnel widening was calculated in percentage against primary tunnel diameter created during the surgery. MRI data were exported to eFilm (Merge Healthcare software), measurement of femoral tunnel diameters was performed on T1 sequences in coronal and sagittal planes on three different levels.

Results. The mean age at the last follow up in the study group was 38.9±1.4, in control group – 38,6±1,08. The median time from surgery to follow up was 9 years and 4 months in the study group and 8 years 7 months in the controls. The incidence of graft failure in the study group was reported as 14.3%, while in the control group as 17,5%. The median femoral tunnel widening was larger in the control group at the joint aperture and midsection levels both in coronal and sagittal plane, although there was no statistically significant differences (p>0,05).

Conclusion. The combination of cortical suspension and transverse HT femoral graft fixation technique is likely to reduce tunnel enlargement at the long term follow-up. However further research and larger sample groups are required. 

About the authors

A. V. Korolev

ECSTO, European Clinic of Sports Traumatology and Orthopaedics;
Peoples Friendship University of Russia

Email: fake@neicon.ru

Andrey V. Korolev – Dr. Sci. (Med.), Chief Doctor and Medical Director of European Clinic of Sports Traumatology and Orthopaedics (ECSTO); Professor of Department of Traumatology and Orthopaedics,Peoples Friendship University of Russia

Russian Federation

N. E. Magnitskaya

ECSTO, European Clinic of Sports Traumatology and Orthopaedics;
Peoples Friendship University of Russia

Author for correspondence.
Email: magnitskaya.nina@gmail.com

Nina E. Magnitskaya – Orthopaedics Trauma Surgeon of European Clinic of Sports Traumatology and Orthopaedics (ECSTO); Postgraduate Student, Department of Traumatology, Orthopaedics,PeoplesFriendshipUniversity ofRussia

Russian Federation

M. S. Ryazantsev

ECSTO, European Clinic of Sports Traumatology and Orthopaedics;
Peoples Friendship University of Russia

Email: fake@neicon.ru

 Mikhail S. Ryazantsev – Orthopaedics Trauma Surgeon of European Clinic of Sports Traumatology and Orthopaedics (ECSTO); Postgraduate Student, Department of Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Arthrology,Peoples Friendship University of Russia

Russian Federation

D. O. Il’in

ECSTO, European Clinic of Sports Traumatology and Orthopaedics

Email: fake@neicon.ru
Dmitrii O. Il’in – Cand. Sci. (Med.), Orthopaedics Trauma Surgeon Russian Federation

A. P. Afanasyev

ECSTO, European Clinic of Sports Traumatology and Orthopaedics

Email: fake@neicon.ru
Aleksei P. Afanas’yev – Cand. Sci. (Med.) Orthopedic Surgeon, Orthopaedics Trauma Surgeon Russian Federation

A. V. Frolov

ECSTO, European Clinic of Sports Traumatology and Orthopaedics;
Peoples Friendship University of Russia

Email: fake@neicon.ru
Aleksandr V. Frolov – Cand. Sci. (Med.) Orthopedic Surgeon Russian Federation

References

  1. Ахпашев А.А., Загородний Н.В., Щеголева Н.Н., Гнелица Н.Н., Королев А.В. Морфологические аспекты несостоятельности аутотрансплантата передней крестообразной связки. Вестник новых медицинских технологий. 2007;(4):47-49.
  2. Карасева Т.Ю., Карасев Е.А. Артроскопические технологии лечения больных с нестабильностью коленного сустава. Гений ортопедии. 2013;(4):38-43.
  3. Королев А.В. Комплексное восстановительное лечение пациентов с повреждениями менисков и связок коленного сустава с использованием артроскопических методик [автореф. дис. … д-ра мед. наук]. М., 2004. 24 с.
  4. Лазишвили Г.Д., Шехтер А.Б., Лисицын М.П., Скороглядов П.А., Копылов А.А., Лисицина Е.М. Артроскопическая и гистологическая оценка харак тера ремоделирования трансплантата после ауто-пластического замещения передней крестообразной связки коленного сустава. Вестник травматологии и ортопедии им. Н.Н. Приорова. 2007;(1):28-33.
  5. Серебряк Т. Артроскопическая реконструкция передней крестообразной связки с использованием различных сухожильных трансплантатов [автореф. дис. … кандидат медицинских наук]. СПб., 2012. 24 с.
  6. Ahmad C.S., Gardner T.R., Groh M., Arnouk J., Levine W.N. Mechanical properties of soft tissue femoral fixation devices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(3):635-640. doi: 10.1177/0363546503261714.
  7. Basson B., Philippot R., Neri T., Meucci J.F., Boyer B., Farizon F. The effect of femoral tunnel widening on oneyear clinical outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using ZipLoop technology for fixation in the cortical bone of the femur. Knee. 2016;23(2):233-236. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2015.06.002.
  8. Baumfeld J.A., Diduch D.R., Rubino L.J., Hart J.A., Miller M.D., Barr M.S., Hart J.M. Tunnel widening following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autograft: a comparison between double cross-pin and suspensory graft fixation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16(12):1108-1813. doi: 10.1007/s00167-008-0606-y
  9. Fauno P., Kaalund S. Tunnel widening after hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is influenced by the type of graft fixation used: a prospective randomized study. Arthroscopy. 2005;21(11):1337-1341.
  10. Gabler C.M., Jacobs C.A., Howard J.S., Mattacola C.G., Johnson D.L. Comparison of graft failure rate between autografts placed via an anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction technique a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(4):1069-1079. doi: 10.1177/0363546515584043.
  11. Gabr A., O’Leary S., Spalding T., Bollen S., Haddad F. The UK National Ligament Registry Report 2015. Knee. 2015;22(4):351-353. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2015.05.002.
  12. Gianotti S.M., Marshall S.W., Hume P.A., Bunt L. Incidence of anterior cruciate ligament injury and other knee ligament injuries: a national population-based study. J Sci Med Sport. 2009;12(6):622-627. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2008.07.005.
  13. Granan L.P., Forssblad M., Lind M., Engebretsen L. The Scandinavian ACL registries 2004–2007: baseline epidemiology. Acta Orthop. 2009;80(5):563-567. doi: 10.3109/17453670903350107.
  14. Hantes M.E., Mastrokalos D.S., Yu J., Paessler H.H. The effect of early motion on tibial tunnel widening after anterior cruciate ligament replacement using hamstring tendon grafts. Arthroscopy. 2004;20(6):572-580.
  15. Janssen K.W., Orchard J.W., Driscoll T.R., van Mechelen W. High incidence and costs for anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions performed in Australia from 2003–2004 to 2007–2008: time for an anterior cruciate ligament register by Scandinavian model? Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2012;22(4): 495-501. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01253.x.
  16. Kobayashi M., Nakagawa Y., Suzuki T., Okudaira S., Nakamura T. A retrospective review of bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendons fixed with a metal round cannulated interference screw in the femur. Arthroscopy. 2006;22(10):1093-1099. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.05.017.
  17. Kousa P., Järvinen T.L., Vihavainen M., Kannus P., Järvinen M. The fixation strength of six hamstring tendon graft fixation devices in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction part I: femoral site. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31(2):174-181. doi: 10.1177/03635465030310020401.
  18. Kuskucu S.M. Comparison of short-term results of bone tunnel enlargement between EndoButton CL and cross-pin fixation systems after chronic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autologous quadrupled hamstring tendons. J Int Med Res. 2008;36(1):23-30.
  19. Kvist J., Kartus J., Karlsson J., Forssblad M. Results from the Swedish national anterior cruciate ligament register. Arthroscopy. 2014;30(7):803-810. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.02.036.
  20. Lee Y.S., Ahn J.H., Lim H.C., Kim J.G., Yoo J.H., Wang J.H., Park J.S. Structural change of soft tissue anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with cross-pin fixation between immediate and postoperative 8 weeks: a study with use of magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(2):285-290. doi: 10.1177/0363546508324691.
  21. Leys T., Salmon L., Waller A., Linklater J., Pinczewski L. Clinical results and risk factors for reinjury 15 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective study of hamstring and patellar tendon grafts. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(3):595-605. doi: 10.1177/0363546511430375.
  22. Lopes O.V. Jr., de Freitas Spinelli L., Leite L.H., Buzzeto B.Q., Saggin P.R., Kuhn A. Femoral tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using RigidFix compared with extracortical fixation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;27:1-7. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3888-x.
  23. Milano G., Mulas P.D., Ziranu F., Piras S., Manunta A., Fabbriciani C. Comparison between different femoral fixation devices for ACL reconstruction with doubled hamstring tendon graft: a biomechanical analysis. Arthroscopy. 2006;22(6):660-668. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.04.082.
  24. Monaco E., Labianca L., Speranza A., Agrò A.M., Camillieri G., D’Arrigo C., Ferretti A. Biomechanical evaluation of different anterior cruciate ligament fixation techniques for hamstring graft. J Orthop Sci. 2010;15(1):125-131. doi: 10.1007/s00776-009-1417-9.
  25. Pinczewski L., Salmon L., Thompson S., Waller A., Linklater J., Roe J. Radiographic Osteoarthritis, Clinical Outcomes and Re-Injury 20 Years after ACL Reconstruction. A Prospective Study Of Hamstring and Patellar Tendon Grafts. Orthop J Sports Med. 2016;4(2):2325967116S00004. Published online 2016 Feb 16. doi: 10.1177/2325967116S00004.
  26. Rodeo S.A., Kawamura S., Kim H.J., Dynybil C., Ying L. Tendon healing in a bone tunnel differs at the tunnel entrance versus the tunnel exit: an effect of graft-tunnel motion? Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(11):1790-800.
  27. Sabat D., Kundu K., Arora S., Kumar V. Tunnel widening after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized computed tomography--based study comparing 2 different femoral fixation methods for hamstring graft. Arthroscopy. 2011;27(6):776-783. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.02.009.
  28. Sanders T.L., Maradit Kremers H., Bryan A.J., Larson D.R., Dahm D.L., Levy B.A., Stuart M.J., Krych A.J. Incidence of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears and Reconstruction: A 21-Year Population-Based Study. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(6):1502-1507. doi: 10.1177/0363546516629944.
  29. Saygi B., Karaman O., Sirin E., Arslan I., Demir A., Oztermeli A. Comparison of different femoral fixation implants and fit techniques for tunnel widening and clinical outcome in ACL reconstruction using hamstring autograft. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016;136(2):241-247. doi: 10.1007/s00402-015-2348-x.
  30. Stoller D.W. Stoller’s atlas of orthopaedics and sports medicine. Philadelphia : Wolters Kluwer Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2008. 1039 p.
  31. Ugutmen E., Ozkan K., Güven M., Sener N., Altintas F. Early tunnel enlargement after arthroscopic ACL reconstructions. Acta Orthop Belg. 2007;73(5):625-629.
  32. Weber A.E., Delos D., Oltean H.N., Vadasdi K., Cavanaugh J., Potter H.G., Rodeo S.A. Tibial and Femoral Tunnel Changes After ACL Reconstruction: A Prospective 2-Year Longitudinal MRI Study. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(5): 1147-1156. doi: 10.1177/0363546515570461.
  33. Webster K.E., Feller J.A., Leigh W.B., Richmond A.K. Younger patients are at increased risk for graft rupture and contralateral injury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(3):641-647. doi: 10.1177/0363546513517540.

Copyright (c)



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies