Experimental substantiation of acetabular component impaction with uncoverage in arthroplasty of patients with severe hip dysplasia

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Purpose. Estimation of critical value of acetabular component uncoverage enabling its implantation without an additional support. Methods. A comparative analysis of an original method for intraoperative measurement of uncoverage space of acetabular component based on the measurement of the depth of uncovered sector with X-ray control by the same technique was carried out. Mathematical computer modeling based on the finite element techniqueand the mechanical experiment were performed. Critical values of uncoverage enabling safe primary fixation of acetabular component were estimated in designed models. Results. High rate of coincidence of direct intraoperative and postoperative measurements by radiograms was obtained, testifying to the possibility of application of this technique of uncoverage estimation at the stage of preoperative X-ray planning in patients with different degree of dysplasia. Using the finite element technique and the mechanical experiment on pelvis models, a possibility of mounting anacetabular component with moderate uncoverage within 25% without screws and with significant uncoverage to 35% with additional two screws fixation was demonstrated.

About the authors

R. M. Tikhilov

Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics; Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: info@rniito.org
Russian Federation

I. I. Shubnyakov

Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics

Email: shubnyakov@mail.ru
Russian Federation

A. V. Mazurenko

Federal Centre of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Arthroplasty

Email: amazourenko.home@inbox.ru
Russian Federation

V. I. Mitryaikin

A.N. Tupolev Kazan National Research Technical University

Email: kati_mit@mail.ru
Russian Federation

O. A. Sachenkov

N.I. Lobachevsky Institute of Mathematics and Mechanics of Kazan (Volga region) Federal University

Email: 4works@bk.ru
Russian Federation

A. K. Kuzin

Institute Of Metallurgy, Mechanical Engineering and Transport

Email: kuzin_aleksei@mail.ru
Russian Federation

A. O. Denisov

Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics

Email: med-03@yandex.ru
Russian Federation

D. G. Pliev

Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics

Email: plievd@gmail.com
Russian Federation

A. A. Boyarov

Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics

Email: bojaroffaa@mail.ru
Russian Federation

A. N. Kovalenko

Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics

Email: ankovalenko@rniito.ru
Russian Federation

References

  1. Волокитина Е.А., Колотыгин Д.А.. Особенности первичной и ревизионной имплантации бесцементного тазового компонента при диспластическом коксартрозе. Травматология и ортопедия России. 2009; (3): 119-121
  2. Пернер К. Применение системы Zweymuller при лечении диспластического коксартроза. Вест. травматологии и ортопедии им. Н.Н. Приорова. 1999; (1): 35-38
  3. Соболев И.П., Неверов В.А., Малинин В.Л. Особенности хирургического лечения дисплазии тазобедренного сустава у взрослых. СПб. : изд. дом СПбМАПО; 2005. 16 с
  4. Тихилов Р.М., Шаповалов В.М., ред. Руководство по эндопротезированию. СПб.; 2008. 324 с
  5. Anderson M.J., Harris W.H. Total hip arthroplasty with insertion of the acetabular component without cement in hips with total congenital dislocation or marked congenital dysplasia. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1999; 81 (3): 347-354
  6. Atilla B. Position of the acetabular component determines the fate of femoral head autografts in total hip replacement for acetabular dysplasia. J. Bone Joint Surg. B. 2007; 89 (7):874-878
  7. Bektaşer B. Total hip arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis secondary to developmental dysplasia of the hip: results after a mean of eight-year follow-up. Acta Orthop. Traumatol. Turc. 2007; 41 (2):108–112.
  8. Delbarre J.C. Total hip arthroplasty after proximal femoral osteotomy: 75 cases with 9-year follow-up. Rev. Chir. Orthop. 2002; 88 (3):245-256.
  9. Engesaeter L.B., Furnes О., Havelin L.I. Developmental dysplasia of the hip - good results of later total hip arthroplasty: 7135 primary total hip arthroplasties after developmental dysplasia of the hip compared with 59774 total hip arthroplasties in idiopathic coxarthrosis followed for 0 to 15 years in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. J. Arthroplasty. 2008; 23 (2):235-240.
  10. Garvin K.L., Bowen M.K., Salvati E.A., Ranawat C.S. Long-term results of total hip arthroplasty in congenital dislocation and dysplasia of the hip: a follow-up note. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1991; 73:1348- 1354.
  11. Gross A.E., Allan D.G., Catre M., Garbuz D.S., Stockley I. Bone grafts in hip replacement surgery: the pelvic side. Orthop. Clin. North. America. 1993; 24: 679-695.
  12. Jasty M., Anderson M.J., Harris W.H. Total hip replacement for developmental dysplasia of the hip. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1995; (311):40-45.
  13. Kaneuji A. Minimum ten-year results of a porous acetabular component for Crowe I to III hip dysplasia using an elevated hip center J. Arthroplasty. 2009; 24 (2):187- 194.
  14. Kim Y.H., Kim J.S. Total hip arthroplasty in adult patients who had developmental dys-plasia of the hip. J. Arthroplasty. 2005; 20:1029-1036.
  15. Li J. Total hip arthroplasty for patients with osteoarthritis secondary to hip developmental dysplasia. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2005; 43 (4): 255-258.
  16. Rogers B.A., Garbedian S., Kuchinad R.A. Total hip arthroplasty for adult hip dysplasia. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2012; 94:1809- 1821.
  17. Shetty A.A., Sharma P., Singh S. Bulk femoral-head autografting in unce-mented total hip arthroplasty for acetabular dysplasia: results at 8 to 11 years follow-up. J. Arthroplasty. 2004; 19:706-713.
  18. Shi Z.C., Li Z.R., Sun W. Acetabular component centralization in total hip arthroplasty for acetabular dysplasia. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2004; 42 (23):1412 -1415.
  19. Shinar A.A., Harris W.H. Bulk structural autogenous grafts and allografts for recon-struction of the acetabulum in total hip arthroplasty: sixteen-year-average follow-up. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1997; 79:159-168.
  20. Shinar, A.A., Harris W.H. Cemented total hip arthroplasty following previous femoral osteotomy: an average 16-year follow-up study. J. Arthroplasty. 1998; 13 (3):243-253.
  21. Silber D.A., Engh C.A. Cementless total hip arthroplasty with femoral head bone grafting for hip dysplasia. J. Arthroplasty. 1990; 5:231-240.
  22. Seballe, K. Total hip replacement after medial-displacement osteotomy of the proximal part of the femur. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1989; 71 (5): 692- 697.
  23. Thillemann T. Implant survival after primary total hip arthroplasty due to childhood hip disorders: results from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Registry. Acta Orthop. 2008; 79 (6):769-776.
  24. Zhang X., Zhou Y., Ren X. Total hip arthroplasty for treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2006; 20 (6):647-650.

Copyright (c)



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies