Management of femur and tibia metaphyseal bone defects during revision total knee arthroplasty – methods and outcomes (review)
- Authors: Bovkis G.Y.1, Kulyaba T.A.1, Kornilov N.N.2
-
Affiliations:
- Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, ul. Ak. Baykova, 8, St. Petersburg, Russia, 195427
- Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, ul. Ak. Baykova, 8, St. Petersburg, Russia, 195427 Mechnikov North Western State Medical University, Kirochnaya ul., 41, St. Petersburg, Russia, 191015
- Issue: Vol 22, No 2 (2016)
- Pages: 101-113
- Section: Reviews
- Submitted: 16.09.2016
- Accepted: 16.09.2016
- Published: 16.09.2016
- URL: https://journal.rniito.org/jour/article/view/163
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.21823/2311-2905-2016-0-2-101-113
- ID: 163
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is becoming an increasingly common treatment for a wide variety of diseases, as well as treatment for consequences from knee injury. The number of primary joint replacement operations have been steadily climbing. As a result, the number of revision procedures have also grown, accounting for 6–8% of arthroplasties. The problem of bone defects compensation remains one of the greatest challenges faced by the surgeon during revision TKA and usually requires a comprehensive approach, careful preoperative planning and preparation. The compensation of small, in depth and extent, bone defects (AORI Type I and II) does not present serious difficulties and their methods are well developed. Whereas the compensation of massive defects (Type 3) is extremely difficult. Until recently, structural allografts were the only method available to surgeons and still remain relevant and demonstrate good results. In recent years, as an alternative, it has become possible to use sleeves and cones made of porous metal, which are also showing very promising mid-term results. This review demonstrates the results from recent studies of mid-term and long-term outcomes of revision TKA, in which different methods of bone defect compensation were used. The clinical evidence did not demonstrate any obvious advantage of using one method over another, therefore, research in this area continues to remain relevant.
About the authors
G. Y. Bovkis
Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, ul. Ak. Baykova, 8, St. Petersburg, Russia, 195427
Author for correspondence.
Email: dr.Bovkis@mail.ru
researcher of knee pathology department of Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics
РоссияT. A. Kulyaba
Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, ul. Ak. Baykova, 8, St. Petersburg, Russia, 195427
Email: fake@neicon.ru
head of knee pathology department of Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics
РоссияN. N. Kornilov
Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, ul. Ak. Baykova, 8, St. Petersburg, Russia, 195427Mechnikov North Western State Medical University, Kirochnaya ul., 41, St. Petersburg, Russia, 191015
Email: fake@neicon.ru
professor of chair of traumatology and orthopaedics of Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, associate professor of department of traumatology and orthopaedics of Mechnikov North Western State Medical University
РоссияReferences
- Корнилов Н.Н., Куляба Т.А., Филь А.С., Ю.В. Муравьёва Ю.В. Данные регистра эндопротезирования коленного сустава РНИИТО им Р.Р. Вредена за 2011– 2013 годы. Травматология и ортопедия России. 2015; 1(75):136-151.
- Куляба Т.А. Ревизионная артропластика коленного сустава. [автореф. дис. … д-ра мед. наук]. СПб.: РНИИТО им. Р.Р. Вредена; 2012. 46 с.
- Куляба Т.А., Корнилов Н.Н., Румакин В.П., Бовкис Г.Ю., Сараев А.В. Принципы восполнения костных дефектов при реэндопротезировании коленного сустава. В кн.: Ревизионная артропластика коленного сустава. СПб.: РНИИТО им. Вредена; 2016. с. 123-139.
- Куляба Т.А., Корнилов Н.Н., Селин А.В., Разорёнов В.Л., Кроитору И.И., Петухов А.И., Каземирский А.В., Засульский Ф.Ю., Игнатенко В.Л., Сараев А.В. Способы компенсации костных дефектов при ревизионном эндопротезировании коленного сустава. Травматология и ортопедия России. 2011; (61):5-12.
- Мурылев В., Холодаев М., Елизаров П., Рубин Г., Музыченков А. Опыт применения в травматологии онкопротезов коленного сустава при обширных околосуставных костных дефектах. Врач. 2015; 1:64-68.
- Новосёлов К.А., Н.Н. Корнилов, Т.А. Куляба. Травматология и ортопедия. руководство для врачей. Повреждения и заболевания коленного сустава. Гиппократ: СПб.; 2006. Т. 3, гл. 5. с. 213-438.
- Agarwal S., Azam A., Morgan-Jones R. Metal metaphyseal sleeves in revision total knee replacement. Bone & Joint J Br. 2013; 95(12):1640-1644.
- Backstein D., Safir O., Gross A. et al. Management of bone loss:structural grafts in revision total joint replacement. Clin Orthop. 2006; 446:104-112.
- Bargar W.L., Gross T.P. A classification of bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty, Revision total knee arthroplasty. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia. 1992. 68 р.
- Barrack R.L. Evolution of the rotation hinge for complex total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 2001; 392:292-299.
- Barrack R.L., Lyons T.R., Ingraham R.Q. et al. The use of a modular rotating hinge component in salvage revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2000; 15:858-866.
- Bauman R.D., Lewallen D.G., Hanssen A.D. Limitations of structural allograft in revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009; 467(3):818-24.
- Beckmann N.A., Mueller S., Gondan M., Jaeger S., Reiner T., Bitsch R.G. Treatment of severe bone defects during revision total knee arthroplasty with structural allografts and porous metal cones – a systematic review. J Arthroplasty. 2015; 30(2):249-253.
- Bezwada HP, Shah AR, Zambito K, Cerynik DL, Johanson NA. Distal femoral allograft reconstruction for massive osteolytic bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006; 21(2):242-248.
- Brooks P.J., Walker P.S., Scott R.D. Tibial component fixation in deficient tibial bone stock. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984; 184:302-308.
- Buck B.E., Malinin T.I., Brown M.D. Bone transplantation and human immunodeficiency virus:an estimate of risk of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989; 240:129-136.
- Burnett R.S., Keeney J.A., Maloney W.J., Clohisy J.C. Revision total knee arthroplasty for major osteolysis. Iowa Orthop J. 2009; 29:28-37.
- Chun C.H., Kim J.W., Kim S.H., Kim B.G., Chun K.C., Kim K.M. Clinical and radiological results of femoral head structural allograft for severe bone defects in revision TKA - A minimum 8-year follow-up. Knee. 2014; 21(2): 420-3.
- Clatworthy M.G., Ballance J., Brick G.W., Chandler H.P., Gross A.E. The use of structural allograft for uncontained defects in revision total knee arthroplasty. A minimum fiveyear review. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001; 83(3):404-411.
- Daines B.K., Dennis D.A. Management of Bone Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; 94 (12):1131-1139.
- Derome P., Sternheim A., Backstein D., Malo M. Treatment of large bone defects with trabecular metal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty:short term clinical and radiographic outcomes. J Arthroplasty. 2014; 28-9:1556-60.
- Dorr L.D., Ranawat C.S., Sculco T.A. et al. Bone graft for tibial defects in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986; 205:153-165.
- Engh G.A., Ammeen D.J. Use of structural allograft in revision total knee arthroplasty in knees with severe tibial bone loss. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89(12):2640-2647.
- Engh G.A., Ammeen D.J. Classification and preoperative radiographic evaluation:knee. Orthop Clin North Am. 1988; 29:205-217.
- Engh G.A., Rorabeck C.H. Revision total knee arthroplasty. Lippincott-Raven Philadelphia; 1997. 459 р.
- Ewald, F.C. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop. 1989; 248:9-12.
- Fehring T.K., Peindl R.D., Humble R.S. et al. Modular tibial augmentations in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996; 327:207-217.
- Ghazavi M.T., Stockley I., Yee G., Davis A., Gross A.E. Reconstruction of massive bone defects with allograft in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997; 79(1):17-25.
- Gioe T.J., Killeen K.K., Grimm K. Why are total knee replacements revised? Analysis of early revision in a community knee implant registry. Clin Orthop. 2004; 428:100-106.
- Gonzalez M.H., Mekhail A.O. The failed total knee arthroplasty:evaluation and etiology. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2004; 12:436-446.
- Haidukewych G.J., Hanssen A., Jones R.D. Metaphyseal fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty:indications and techniques. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011; 19:311-318.
- Harada Y., Wevers H.W., Cooke T.D. Distribution of bone strength in the proximal tibia. J Arthroplasty. 1988; 3:167-175.
- Harris A.I., Poddar S., Gitelis S., Sheinkop M.B., Rosenberg A.G. Arthroplasty with a composite of an allograft and a prosthesis for knees with severe deficiency of bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995; 77(3):373-86.
- Howard J.L., Kudera J., Lewallen D.G., Hanssen A.D. Early results of the use of tantalum femoral cones for revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011; 93(5):478- 84.
- Huff T.W., Sculco T.P. Management of bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007; 22 ( 3):32-36.
- Insall J., Scott W. Surgery of the knee. Churchill Livingstone, N.Y.; 2001. 2028 р.
- Jensen C.L., Winther N., Schrøder H.M., Petersen M.M. Outcome of revision total knee arthroplasty with the use of trabecular metal cone for reconstruction of severe bone loss at the proximal tibia. Knee. 2013; 21(6):1233-1237.
- Kurtz S., Ong K., Lau E., Mowat F., Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg am. 2007; 89(4):780- 785.
- Lachiewicz P.F., Falatyn S.P. Clinical and radiographic results of total condylar III and constrained condylar total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1996; 11:916-922.
- Lachiewicz P.F., Bolognesi M.P., Henderson R.A., Soileau E.S., Vail T.P. Can tantalum cones provide fixation in complex revision knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012; 70(1):199-204.
- Long W.J., Scuderi G.R. Porous tantalum cones for large metaphyseal tibial defects in revision total knee arthroplasty:a minimum 2-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2009; 24(7):1086-1092.
- Lotke P.A., Carolan G.F., Puri N. Impaction grafting for bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006; 446:99-103.
- Lyall H.S., Sanghrajka A., Scott G. Severe tibial bone loss in revision total knee replacement managed with structural femoral head allograft:a prospective case series from the Royal London Hospital. Knee. 2009; 16(5):326-331.
- Mabry T.M., Hanssen A.D. The role of stems and augments for bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007; 22(1):56-60.
- Mahomed N.N., Barret J., Katz J.N., Baron J.A., Wright J., Losina E. Epidimiology of total knee replacement in the United States Medicare population. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87(6);1222-1228.
- Meneghini R.M., Lewallen D.G., Hanssen A.D. Use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss during revision total knee replacement. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; 91(Suppl 2, Pt 1): 131-138.
- Meneghini R.M., Lewallen D.G., Hanssen A.D. Use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss during revision total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90:78-84.
- Mnaymneh W., Emerson R.H., Borja F., Head W.C., Malinin T.I. Massive allografts in salvage revisions of failed total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990; 260: 144- 153.
- Morgan D.F., Franke K.F., Nusem I., Gamboa G. Outcome of revision total knee arthroplasty with bone allograft in 30 cases. Acta Orthop Belg. 2013; 79(4):427-434.
- Mow C.S., Wiedel J.D. Structural allografting in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1996; 11(3): 235-41.
- Munjal S., Philips M.J., Krakow K.A. Revision total knee arthroplasty:planning, controversies and management-infection. Instr Course Lect. 2001; 50:367-377.
- Nelson C.L., Gioe T.G., Cheng E.Y., Thompson Jr. R.C. Implant selection in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85:43-51.
- P anni A.S., Vasso M., Cerciello S. Modular augmentation in revision total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Trauml Arthrosc. 2013; 21(12):2837-2843.
- P atel J.V., Masonis J.L., Guerin J. et al. The fate of augments to treat type-2 bone defects in revision knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004; 86:195-199.
- Qiu Y.Y., Yan C.H., Chiu K.Y., Ng F.Y. Treatment for bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2012; 20(1):78-86.
- Radnay C.S., Scuderi G.R. Management of bone loss:augments, cones, offset stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006; 446:83-92.
- Rand J.A., Ries M.D., Landis G.H., Rosenberg A.G. Intraoperative assessment in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. 2003; 85:26-37.
- Rand J.A. Bone deficiency in total knee arthroplasty. Use of metal wedge augmentation. Clin Orthop. 1991; 271:63-71.
- Rao B.M., Kamal T.T., Vafaye J., Moss M. Tantalum cones for major osteolysis in revision knee replacement. Bone Joint J Br. 2013; 95(8):1069-1074.
- Rise M., Haas S., Windsor R. Soft-tissue balance in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85(Suppl 1):38-42.
- Ritter M.A., Keating E.M., Faris P.M. Screw and cement fixation of large defects in total knee arthroplasty: a sequel. J Arthroplasty. 1992; 8:63-65.
- Schmitz H.C., Klauser W., Citak M., Al-Khateeb H., Gehrke T., Kendoff D. Three-year follow up utilizing tantal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013; 28(9):1556-1560.
- Stockley I., McAuley J.P., Gross A.E. Allograft reconstruction in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992; 74(3):393-397.
- Taylor M., Wood G. Revision Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasty for Massive Bone Loss and Periprosthetic Fracture Using a Total Femur Prosthesis: A Case Report. Orthop Muscul Syst. 2014; 3:179.
- Tsahakis P.J., Beaver W.B., Brick G.W. Technique and results of allograft reconstruction in revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994; 303:86-94.
- Villanueva-Martinez M., De la Torre-Escudero B., Rojo-Manaute J.M., Rios-Luna A., Chana-Rodriguez F. Tantalum cones in revision total knee arthroplasty. A promising short- term result with 29 cones in 21 patients. J Arthroplasty. 2013; 28(6):988-993.
- Wang J.W., Hsu C.H., Huang C.C., Lin P.C., Chen W.S. Reconstruction using femoral head allograft in revision total knee replacement:an experience in Asian patients. Bone Joint J. 2012; 95 (B-5):643-648.
- Wilde A.H., Schickendantz M.S., Stulberg B.N., Go R.T. The incorporation of tibial allografts in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990; 72(6): 815-824.