Comment to the Article „Mid-Term Outcomes of Revision Hip Arthroplasty with Acetabular Augments"

Cover Page


Cite item

Abstract

.

About the authors

A. O. Denisov

Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics

Author for correspondence.
Email: med-03@yandex.ru

Alexei O. Denisov - Cand. Sci. (Med), academic secretary.

St. Petersburg

Russian Federation

References

  1. Pulido L., Rachala S.R., Cabanela M.E. Cementless acetabular revision: past, present, and future. Revision total hip arthroplasty: The acetabular side using cementless implants. Int Orthop. 2011;35:289-298.
  2. Haynes J.A., Stambough J.B., Sassoon A.A., Johnson S.R., Clohisy J.C., Nunley R.M. Contemporary surgical indications and referral trends in revision total hip arthroplasty: A 100-year review. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31:622-625.
  3. Villanueva-Martmez M., Rrns-Luna A, Diaz-Maurino J. Massive acetabular bone loss: limits of trabecular metal cages. Indian J Orthop. 2011;45:78-81
  4. Unger A.S., Lewis R.J., Gruen T. Evaluation of a porous tantalum uncemented acetabular cup in revision total hip arthroplasty: clinical and radiological results of 60 hips. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20(8):1002-1009.
  5. Jafari S.M., Coyle C., Mortazavi S.M., Sharkey P.F., Parvizi J. Revision hip arthroplasty: infection is the most common cause of failure. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:2046-2051.
  6. The New Zealand Joint Registry: Seventeen year report: January 1999 to December 2015. Available at: http://www.nzoa.org.nz/system/files/NJR17YearReport.pdf. Accessed August 30, 2017.

Copyright (c)



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies