Email this article 
TRAUMATOLOGY AND ORTHOPEDICS RESEARCH SPECIALITY IN 2017: DISSERTATIONS ANALYSIS
- Authors: Reshetov I.V.1, Tikhilov R.M.2,3, Kochish A.Y.4, Shubnyakov I.I.4
-
Affiliations:
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical university.
- Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics
- Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University.
- Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics.
- Issue: Vol 24, No 3 (2018)
- Pages: 9-18
- Section: ARTICLES
- Submitted: 05.10.2018
- Accepted: 05.10.2018
- Published: 05.10.2018
- URL: https://journal.rniito.org/jour/article/view/1040
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.21823/2311-2905-2018-24-3-9-18
- ID: 1040
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The authors present a short analysis of autoabstracts of all theses in traumatology and orthopedics speciality (14.01.15), 10 doctoral and 59 candidate theses, that were defended at 11 dedicated dissertation boards starting mid of October 2016 until mid of October 2017 and underwent expert reviews during 2017 in expert council of the Higher certifying commission on surgical science.
The absolute majority of 26 papers in traumatology (16 candidate and 5 doctoral theses) were dedicated to treatment of patients with different fractures and another 5 candidate theses examined issues of arthroscopic procedures in case of a trauma. 25 dissertations in orthopedics mainly reviewed aspects of large joints replacement (6 candidate and 3 doctoral these) and treatment of periprosthetic infection (4 candidate theses). Spine pathologies (5 candidate theses) and oncology orthopedics (2 candidate theses) prevailed among dissertation topics on paediatric orthopedics. The only doctoral thesis on paediatric orthopaedics was dedicated to clubfoot.
In accordance with recommended criteria of clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research journal 40 (67,8%) candidate theses and 2 (20%) doctoral theses corresponded to evidence level III, 17 (28,8%) candidate and 8 (80%) doctoral theses were classified as evidence level IV and only 2 candidate theses (3,4%) formally corresponded to evidence level II.
About the authors
I. V. Reshetov
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical university.
Author for correspondence.
Email: fake@neicon.ru
Igor V. Reshetov — acad. RaS, dr. Sci. (Med.), professor, director of plastic Surgery clinic, head of Oncology and Reconstructive Surgery department.
Moscow.
РоссияR. M. Tikhilov
Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics; Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University.
Email: fake@neicon.ru
Rashid M. Tikhilov — dr. Sci. (Med.), professor, director .
8, ul. Akad. Baykova, 195427, St. Petersburg; 41, Kirochnaya ul., 191015, St. Petersburg.
РоссияA. Yu. Kochish
Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics.
Email: fake@neicon.ru
Alexandr Yu. Kochish — dr. Sci. (Med.), professor, deputy director for Research and academic affairs.
8, ul. Akad. Baykova, 195427, St. Petersburg.
РоссияI. I. Shubnyakov
Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics.
Email: fake@neicon.ru
Igor I. Shubnyakov — dr. Sci. (Med.), chief researcher.
8, ul. Akad. Baykova, 195427, St. Petersburg.
РоссияReferences
- Дьячков А.Н., Солдатов Ю.П. Обзор диссертационных работ, защищенных в диссертационном совете ДМ 208.079.01 при ФГБУ «Российский научный центр «Восстановительная травматология и ортопедия» имени академика Г.А. Илизарова» во втором полугодии 2013 года. Гений ортопедии. 2014;(3):107-112.
- Дьячков А.Н., Солдатов Ю.П., Овчинников Е.Н. Аналитический обзор диссертационных ра-бот, защищенных в диссертационном совете ДМ208.79.01 при ФГБУ «Российский научный центр «Восстановительная травматология и ортопедия» им. акад. Г.А. Илизарова Минздрава России в 2015 году. Гений ортопедии. 2016:(1):104-106.
- Альбицкий В.Ю., Устинова Н.В., Антонова Е.В. Наукометрический анализ диссертационных исследований по специальности «общественное здоровье и здравоохранение”, относящихся к детскому населению. Проблемы социальной гигиены, здравоохранения и истории медицины. 2014;(1):24-28.
- Липский С.И. Диссертации как объект научного анализа. Вестник Московского государственного университета культуры и искусств. 2009;(1):110-115.
- Lin S.S., Baxi O., Yeranosian M. What’s new in foot and ankle surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018;100(10):892-898. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.01672.
- Ninomiya J.T., Dean J.C., Incavo S.J. What’s New in Hip Replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(18):1591-1596. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00704.
- Pierce T.P., Elmallah R.K., Jauregui J.J., Cherian J.J., Mont M.A. What’s new in venous thromboembolic prophylaxis following total knee and total hip arthro-plasty? An Update. Surg Technol Int. 2015;26:234-237.
- Schmitz M.R., Blumberg T.J., Nelson S.E., Sees J.P., Sankar W.N. What’s new in pediatric hip? J Pediatr Orthop. 2018;38(6):e300-e304. DOI: 10.1097/ BPO.0000000000001166.
- Dobbs M.B., Gebhardt M.C., Gioe T.J., Manner P.A., Porcher R., Rimnac C.M., Wongworawat M.D., Leopold S.S. Editorial: how does CORR (®) evaluate survey studies? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475(9):2143-2145. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5430-6.
- Haddad F.S. How much evidence does it take to change practice? Bone Joint J. 2017;99-B(7):849-850. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B7.BJJ-2017-0695.
- Leopold S.S. Editorial: CORR (®) will change to double-blind peer review-what took us so long to get there? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475(2):297-299. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5198-0.
- Евдокимов В.И., Шамрей В.К., Чехлатый Е.И., Семин С.А. Сравнительный анализ областей научных исследований в отечественных и зарубежных диссертациях по психиатрии (1992–2015 гг.). Обозрение психиатрии и медицинской психологии имени В.М. Бехтерева. 2016;(3):109-115.
- Трущелёв С.А. Результаты структурного анализа дис-сертаций, представленных к защите по научной специальности «Психиатрия» в 2010 г. Российский психиатрический журнал. 2011;(4):86-89.
Supplementary files
