Internal osteosynthesis in treatment of trochanteric fractures
- 作者: Gilfanov SI1, Klyuchevsky VV1, Danilyak VV1
-
隶属关系:
- 期: 编号 1 (2009)
- 页面: 86-90
- 栏目: ARTICLES
- ##submission.dateSubmitted##: 19.07.2022
- ##submission.datePublished##: 15.03.2009
- URL: https://journal.rniito.org/jour/article/view/1888
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/2311-2905-1888
- ID: 1888
如何引用文章
全文:
详细
The authors studied the results of operative treatment of trochanteric fracture with the use of different devices for osteosynthesis at 817 patients. In 553 cases DHS (dynamic femoral screw) were applied, in 159 - DCS (dynamic condylar screw), in 105 - PFN (proximal femoral nail). Long-term results in terms from 1 are to 5 years are studied at 485 (61,4%) patients. The choice of device for osteosynthesis is determined by the type of injury. At stable fractures it is expedient to use the dynamic femoral screw, at unstable fractures the intraosseous fixators are more effective (proximal femoral nail, Gamma-nail). Application of dynamic condylar screw is justified at intertrochanteric fracture at young patients. At the patients of elderly and senile age it is necessary to execute osteosynthesis by the intraosseous fixators.
参考
- Ключевский, В.В. Хирургия повреждений / В.В. Ключевский. - Ярославль : ДИА-Пресс, 1999. - 644 с.
- Müller, M.E. The comprehensive classification of fractures of long bones / M.E. Müller, S. Nazarian, P. Koch, J. Schatzker. - N.Y. : Springer Verlag, 1990. - 202 p.
- D'Aubigne, M. Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylis prosthesis / M. D'Aubigne, M. Postel // J. Bone Joint Surg. - 1954. - Vol. 36-A. - P. 451-475.