A new technique of closed intramedullary nailing in fractures of the proximal humerus with varus deformity

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Introduction. Varus displacement is common in fractures of the proximal humerus. Development of new low invasive surgical modalities providing anatomy restoration and non-traumatic fracture fixation is actual. Purpose of the study was development of the low invasive technique of closed interlocking nailing providing reduction of the typical varus displacement in fractures and posttraumatic deformities of the proximal humerus. Material and methods. A new technique of correction of the proximal humerus in fractures and posttraumatic deformities was applied in 12 patients - 7 with two-part fractures and 5 with posttraumatic varus deformities. The surgical technique includes application of a small wire circular external frame. Its proximal part is secured to the humeral head to reduce varus displacement along with connection to the distal part of the frame, and the reached alignment is fixed by an intramedullary nail. Results. In all 12 cases we succeeded to reduce the varus deformity. At 1 year follow-up healing was reached in 11 patients, and in one patient exchange compression nailing was performed. Constant score in 1 year was 76±17 after fracture treament, and 70±16 in posttraumatic deformities, which corresponeded to good results. Conclusion. The presented technique allows to reach 40-50° angular correction without open approach and significant soft tissue damage. The obtained results confirm efficacy of the new technique and pertinence of its use in patients with fractures and posttraumatic deformities of this localization. The introduced technique of closed nailing appears to be a promising approach in reconstructive surgery of the proximal humerus.

About the authors

A. N. Chelnokov

Chaklin Ural scientific and research institute of traumatology and orthopaedics

Author for correspondence.
Email: alex61@gmail.com
head of orthopaedic trauma unit Russian Federation

E. A. Lavrukova

Chaklin Ural scientific and research institute of traumatology and orthopaedics

Email: fake@neicon.ru
junior researcher, orthopaedic trauma unit Russian Federation

References

  1. Коган П.Г., Воронцова Т.Н., Шубняков И.И., Воронкевич И.А., Ласунский С.А. Эволюция лечения переломов проксимального отдела плечевой кости (обзор литературы). Травматология и ортопедия России. 2013; (3):154-161.
  2. Мурылев В., А. Имамкулиев А., Елизаров П., Коршев О., Кутузов А. Хирургическое лечение внесуставных переломов проксимального отдела плеча. Врач. 2014; (11):10-13.
  3. A gudelo J., Schürmann M., Stahel P., Helwig P., Morgan S.J., Zechel W., Bahrs C., Parekh A., Ziran B., Williams A., Smith W. Analysis of efficacy and failure in proximal humerus fractures treated with locking plates. J Orthop Trauma. 2007; 21(10):676-681.
  4. Benegas E., Zoppi Filho A., Ferreira Filho A.A., Ferreira Neto A.A., Negri J.H., Prada F.S., Zumiotti A.V. Surgical treatment of varus malunion of the proximal humerus with valgus osteotomy. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007; 16(1):55-59.
  5. Constant C.R., Murley A.H. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop. 1987; (214):160-164.
  6. Court-Brown C.M., Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review. Injury. 2006; 37(8):691-697.
  7. Iyengar J.J., Devcic Z., Sproul R.C., Feeley B.T. Nonoperative treatment of proximal humerus fractures: a systematic review. J Orthop Trauma. 2011; 25(10):612-617.
  8. Jung S.W., Shim S.B., Kim H.M., Lee J.H., Lim H.S. Factors that Influence reduction loss in proximal humerus fracture surgery. J Orthop Trauma. 2015; 29(6):276-282.
  9. Lekic N., Montero N.M., Takemoto R.C., Davidovitch R.I., Egol K.A. Treatment of two-part proximal humerus fractures: intramedullary nail compared to locked plating. Hospital for Special Surgery Journal. 2012; (8):86-91.
  10. Lopiz Y., Garcia-Coiradas J., Garcia-Fernandez C., Marco F. Proximal humerus nailing: a randomized clinical trial between curvilinear and straight nails. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014; 23(3):369-376.
  11. Meller R., Hawi N., Schmiddem U., Millett P.J., Petri M., Krettek C. Posttraumatic nonunions and malunions of the proximal humerus : Possibilities and limitations of corrective osteotomy. Unfallchirurg. 2015;118(7):577-585.
  12. Nolan B.M., Kippe M.A., Wiater J.M., Nowinski G.P. Surgical treatment of displaced proximal humerus fractures with a short intramedullary nail. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011; 20(8):1241-1247.
  13. Park J.Y., Pandher D.S., Chun J.Y., Md S.T. Antegrade humeral nailing through the rotator cuff interval: a new entry portal. J Orthop Trauma. 2008; 22:419-425.
  14. Robinson C.M., Heckman J.D., Court-Brown J.D., Tornetta P., Bucholz R.W. Proximal humerus fractures. In: Rockwood and Green’s fractures in adults. 7th Edition. 2010. P. 1039-1102.
  15. Silverstein M.P., Yirenkyi K., Haidukewych G., Koval K.J. Analysis of failure with the use of locked plates for stabilization of proximal humerus fractures. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 2015; 73(3):185-189.
  16. W ang G., Mao Z., Zhang L., Zhang L., Zhao Y., Yin P., Gao L., Tang P., Kang H. Meta-analysis of locking plate versus intramedullary nail for treatment of proximal humeral fractures. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2015; 10:122.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2015



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 82474 от 10.12.2021.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies