<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Травматология и ортопедия России</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2311-2905</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2542-0933</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Vreden National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">937</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21823/2311-2905-2018-24-1-29-35</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>CLINICAL STUDIES</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>КЛИНИЧЕСКИЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="zh"><subject>Clinical studies</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject></subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURES AFTER JOINT REPLACEMENT: A UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>ПЕРИПРОТЕЗНЫЕ ПЕРЕЛОМЫ ПОСЛЕ ЭНДОПРОТЕЗИРОВАНИЯ СУСТАВОВ: ЕДИНАЯ СИСТЕМА КЛАССИФИКАЦИИ</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Howard</surname><given-names>Lisa C.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Ховард</surname><given-names>Л. С.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="CA">Canada</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Department of Orthopaedics</p><p>Clinical and Research Fellow, Division of Adult Hip and Knee Reconstruction</p><p>2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC V5Z1M9</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>врач и научный сотрудник, отделение восстановительной хирургии тазобедренного и коленного суставов, кафедра ортопедии</p><p>Complex Joint Clinic, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC V5Z1M9</p></bio><email>lchoward25@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Duncan</surname><given-names>Clivе P.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Данкан</surname><given-names>К. П.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="CA">Canada</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Department of Orthopaedics</p><p>Professor and Emeritus Chair</p><p>2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC V5Z1M9</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>профессор, почетный председатель, кафедра ортопедии</p><p>Complex Joint Clinic, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC V5Z1M9</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">University of British Columbia Complex Joint Clinic</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Университет Британской Колумбии</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2018-04-16" publication-format="electronic"><day>16</day><month>04</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>29</fpage><lpage>35</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2018-04-15"><day>15</day><month>04</month><year>2018</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2018-04-15"><day>15</day><month>04</month><year>2018</year></date></history><permissions><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journal.rniito.org/jour/article/view/937">https://journal.rniito.org/jour/article/view/937</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Periprosthetic fracture associated with joint replacement is a common reason for revision arthroplasty and is increasing. Establishing universal principles of management is essential for good outcomes and a classification system that not only classifies, but offers these principles, is critical to achieve this. The Vancouver Classification System (VCS) for periprosthetic fractures involving total hip arthroplasty is validated across North America and Europe. It does not, however, consider other periprosthetic fractures in different joints. The Unified Classification System (UCS) was developed to incorporate the classification and treatment principles of all periprosthetic fractures in any anatomic location. The system is based on the simple mnemonic “ABCDEF” which corresponds to fractures characterized by the following anatomic descriptors: 1) apophyseal; 2) bed of the implant; 3) clear of the implant; 4) dividing the bone between two arthroplasties; 5) each of two bones supporting one arthroplasty; 6) facing and articulating with an implant. Initial validation for the UCS shows substantial and near-perfect inter and intra-observer agreement. Given this performance, it has the potential to evolve into the gold standard classification system for periprosthetic fractures in any joint that they occur.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Перипротезные переломы после эндопротезирования суставов являются частой причиной ревизий, и число подобных осложнений увеличивается. Критично важным для достижения хороших исходов является определение универсальных принципов лечения, а также система классификации, которая не только систематизирует переломы, но и предлагает принципы лечения. В Северной Америке и Европе принята Ванкуверская классификация перипротезных переломов (Vancouver Classification System, VCS) при тотальном эндопротезировании тазобедренного сустава. Однако, данная система не учитывает перипротезные переломы в области других суставов. Единая классификация (Unified Classification System, UCS) объединяет в себе принципы систематизации и лечения всех перипротезных переломов любой локализации. Комплексная классификация основывается на простой мнемонической «ABCDEF» схеме обозначения переломов, исходя из следующих анатомических идентификаторов: 1) апофизарный или внесуставной/чрезсуставной перелом (Apophyseal); 2) перелом, затрагивающий ложе, или костные структуры вокруг протеза (Bed of implant); 3) перелом вне локализации протеза или после его удаления (Clear of the implant); 4) перелом длинных костей, соединяющих два замещенных сустава (Dividing the bone between two arthroplasties); 5) перелом обеих костей, вовлеченных в артропластику одного сустава (Each of two bones supporting one arthroplasty); 6) перелом суставной поверхности после гемиартроплатики (Facing and articulating with an implant). Первая проверка Единой классификации (UCS) продемонстрировала значительную и высоконадежную согласованность заключений одного и нескольких исследователей в отношении ее применения. Учитывая полученные результаты, предлагаемая система может стать «золотым стандартом» классификации перипротезных переломов в области любого сустава.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>joint replacement</kwd><kwd>periprosthetic fractures</kwd><kwd>classification system</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>эндопротезирование суставов</kwd><kwd>перипротезные переломы</kwd><kwd>классификация</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>1. The Swedish Hip Registry. Available from: http://www. shpr.se/Libraryies/Documents/Årsrapport_2011_eng_ webb.sflb.ashx.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>2. Australian National Joint Replacement Registry. Available from: https://aoanjrr.sahmri.com/documents/ 10180/275066/Hip%2C Knee %26 Shoulder Arthroplasty.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>3. 14th Annual Report National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man Available from: http://www.njrreports.org.uk/Portals/0/PDFdownloads/ NJR 14th Annual Report 2017.pdf.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>4. Brady O.H., Garbuz D.S., Masri B.A., Duncan C.P. The reliability and validity of the Vancouver classification of femoral fractures after hip replacement. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15(1):59-62.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>5. Duncan C.P., Masri B.A. Fractures of the femur after hip replacement. Instr Course Lect. 1995;44:293-304.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>6. Rayan F., Dodd M., Haddad F.S. European validation of the Vancouver classification of periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90(12): 1576-1579. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B12.20681.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>7. Goldberg V.M., Figgie H.E., Inglis A.E., Figgie M.P., Sobel M., Kelly M., Kraay M. Patellar fracture type and prognosis in condylar total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;(236):115-122.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>8. Windsor R.E., Scuderi G.R., Insall J.N. Patellar fractures in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1989; 4 Suppl:S63-67.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>9. Keating E.M., Haas G., Meding J.B. Patella fracture after post total knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;(416):93-97. DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000092992.90435.20</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>10. Ortiguera C.J., Berry D.J. Patellar fracture after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84-A(4):532-540.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>11. Vioreanu M.H., Parry M.C., Haddad F.S., Duncan C.P. Field testing the Unified Classification System for periprosthetic fractures of the pelvis and femur around a total hip replacement: an international collaboration. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B(11):1472-1477. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B11.34214.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>12. Van der Merwe J.M., Haddad F.S., Duncan C.P. Field testing the Unified Classification System for periprosthetic fractures of the femur, tibia and patella in association with knee replacement: an international collaboration. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B(12):1669-1673. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B12.34103.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>13. Schütz M., Perka C., Rüedi Th. Periprosthetic fracture management. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag; 2013. 380 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>14. Ricci W.M., Bolhofner B.R., Loftus T., Cox C., Mitchell S., Borrelli J. Indirect reduction and plate fixation, without grafting, for periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures about a stable intramedullary implant. Surgical Technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88 Suppl 1 Pt 2:275-282.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>15. Froberg L., Troelsen A., Brix M. Periprosthetic Vancouver type B1 and C fractures treated by locking-plate osteosynthesis: fracture union and reoperations in 60 consecutive fractures. Acta Orthop. 2012;83(6):648-652. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.747925.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>16. Khan T., Grindlay D., Ollivere B.J., Scammell B.E., Manktelow A.R., Pearson R.G. A systematic review of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures. Bone Joint J. 2017;99-B(4 Supple B):17-25. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B4.BJJ-2016-1311.R1.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>17. Berry D.J. Total hip arthroplasty in patients with proximal femoral deformity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;(369):262-272.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>18. Mulay S., Hassan T., Birtwistle S., Power R. Management of types B2 and B3 femoral periprosthetic fractures by a tapered, fluted, and distally fixed stem. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20(6):751-756. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.11.020.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>19. Park M.S., Lim Y.J., Chung W.C., Ham D.H., Lee S.H. Management of periprosthetic femur fractures treated with distal fixation using a modular femoral stem using an anterolateral approach. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24(8):1270-1276. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.07.013.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>20. Abdel M.P., Lewallen D.G., Berry D.J. Periprosthetic femur fractures treated with modular fluted, tapered stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(2):599-603. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2936-4.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>21. Munro J.T., Garbuz D.S., Masri B.A., Duncan C.P. Tapered fluted titanium stems in the management of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(2):590-598. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3087-3.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
