<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Травматология и ортопедия России</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2311-2905</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2542-0933</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Vreden National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">284</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21823/2311-2905-2012--4-51-58</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>CLINICAL STUDIES</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>КЛИНИЧЕСКИЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="zh"><subject>Clinical studies</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject></subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">PERCUTANEOUS MODIFICATION OF FIRST METATARSOCUNEIFORM JOINT ARTHRODESIS: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>ЧРЕСКОЖНАЯ МОДИФИКАЦИЯ АРТРОДЕЗА ПЕРВОГО ПЛЮСНЕКЛИНОВИДНОГО СУСТАВА: ПРОСПЕКТИВНОЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЕ</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Berezhnoy</surname><given-names>S. Y.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Бережной</surname><given-names>С. Ю.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><email>Doktor@Berezhnoi.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Medincenter GlavUpDK by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Филиал «Мединцентр» ГлавУпДК при МИД России</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2012-12-30" publication-format="electronic"><day>30</day><month>12</month><year>2012</year></pub-date><volume>18</volume><issue>4</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>51</fpage><lpage>58</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2016-11-01"><day>01</day><month>11</month><year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journal.rniito.org/jour/article/view/284">https://journal.rniito.org/jour/article/view/284</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Objective: to reduce surgical approach and to ensure early weight bearing postoperatively. Material and method: by the example of 24 surgeries the results of the 1st MTCJ arthrodesis percutaneous modification, proposed by the author, were reviewed with the mean follow-up of 6 months. Surgical technique was described. 1st MTCJ hypermobility, severe metatarsus primus varus and previous surgeries failures were the indications for surgery. Immediate ambulation with one crutch and fool weight bearing since the 4-5th week postoperatively were authorized. Results: desired correction of the first metatarsal was achieved during 23 interventions. Arthrodesis had fused in 21 of 23 cases that were followed up. Two cases of non-union did not require reoperation. No infectious complications were noted.21 patients were discharged the next day after surgery due to painless early postoperative period. Conclusions: percutaneous 1st MTCJ arthrodesis is a safe and predictable procedure. Proposed surgical technique provides a reliable correction of <italic>metatarsus primus varus</italic> avoiding the main disadvantages of Lapidus procedure: extensive operative approach and postoperative period of fool non-weight bearing.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Цель исследования: уменьшить травматичность операции артродеза I плюснеклиновидного сустава (ПКС) и добиться возможности ранней послеоперационной нагрузки. Материал и методы. Проанализированы результаты операций на 24 стопах с применением предложенной автором чрескожной модификации артродеза I ПКС. Средний срок наблюдений составил 6 месяцев. Показаниями для вмешательства явились гипермобильность I ПКС, выраженное варусное отклонение 1 плюсневой кости, неудачные исходы предыдущих операций. Ходьба при помощи одного костыля с частичной нагрузкой на стопу разрешалась сразу после операции, полная нагрузка - с 4-5-й недели после вмешательства. Результаты. Запланированная коррекция положения 1-й плюсневой кости достигнута в ходе 23 операций. Артродез состоялся в 21 из 23 прослеженных случаев. В 2 наблюдениях артродез не состоялся, однако повторное вмешательство не потребовалось. Инфекционных осложнений не зафиксировано. Слабая выраженность послеоперационного болевого синдрома позволила выписать 91,3% пациентов на следующий после вмешательства день. Выводы. Чрескожный артродез I ПКС - безопасный и воспроизводимый способ коррекции <italic>metatarsus primus varus</italic>. Предложенная техника позволяет справиться с основными факторами, ограничивающими широкое применение операции Лапидуса: высокой травматичностью и необходимостью полной разгрузки оперированной стопы.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>артродез первого плюснеклиновидного сустава</kwd><kwd>чрескожная хирургия стопы</kwd><kwd>операция Лапидуса</kwd><kwd>first metatarsocuneiform joint arthrodesis</kwd><kwd>percutaneous foot surgery</kwd><kwd>Lapidus procedure</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Basile P., Cook E.A., Cook J.J. Immediate weight bearing following modified Lapidus arthrodesis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2010; 49:459-464.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Berezhnoy S. Percutaneous first metatarsocuneiform joint arthrodesis: treatment of severe recurrent forefoot deformity complicated by an infected wound. Foot Ankle Online J. 2012;5(3):2.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Blitz N., DeHeer P. Early weightbearing after Lapidus: is it possible? Podiatry Today. 2004;17:46-54.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Blitz N. Current concepts in medial column hypermobility. Podiatry Today. 2005;18:60-69.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Burg A., Hadash O. Do weight-bearing films affect decision making in hallux valgus surgery? J. Foot Ankle Surg. 2012;51:293-295.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Faber F., Mulder P., Verhaar J. Role of first ray hypermobility in the outcome of the Hohmann and the Lapidus procedure. A prospective, randomized trial involving one hundred and one feet. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2004;86:486-495.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Gerard M., Stern R., Assal M. The modified Lapidus procedure. Orthopedics. 2008;31:230-234.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Lapidus P.W. A quarter of a century of experience with the operative correction of the metatarsus varus primus in hallux valgus. Bull. Hosp. Joint Dis. 1956;17:404-421.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Magee D. J. Orthopedic physical assessment. 5th ed. St. Louis, MO: Saunders Elsevier, 2008. 818 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Myerson M., Badekas A. Hypermobility of the first ray. Foot Ankle Clin. 2000;5:469-484.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Pinney S., Song K., Chou L. Surgical treatment of severe hallux valgus: the state of practice among academic foot and ankle surgeons. Foot Ankle Int. 2006; 27:1024-1029.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Popelka S., Vavrik P. Our results of the Lapidus procedure in patients with hallux valgus deformity. Acta Chir. Orthop. Traumatol. Cech. 2008;75:271-276.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Ravenell R.A. The unreliability of the intermetatarsal angle in choosing a hallux abductovalgus surgical procedure. J. Foot Ankle Surg. 2011;50:287-292.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Roukis T.S., Landsman A.S. Hypermobility of the first ray: a critical review of the literature. J. Foot Ankle Surg. 2003;42:377-390.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Thompson I.M., Bohay D.R., Anderson J.G. Fusion rate of first tarsometatarsal arthrodesis in the modified Lapidus procedure and flatfoot reconstruction. Foot Ankle Int. 2005;26:698-703.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
