<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Травматология и ортопедия России</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2311-2905</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2542-0933</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Vreden National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">279</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21823/2311-2905-2012--4-5-16</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>MODERN TRENDS IN TRAUMATOLOGY AND ORTHOPEDICS</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>СОВРЕМЕННЫЕ ТЕНДЕНЦИИ В ТРАВМАТОЛОГИИ И ОРТОПЕДИИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="zh"><subject></subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject></subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">MODERN TRENDS IN ORTHOPEDICS: REVISION OF THE ACETABULAR AND FEMORAL COMPONENTS</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>СОВРЕМЕННЫЕ ТЕНДЕНЦИИ В ОРТОПЕДИИ: РЕВИЗИИ ВЕРТЛУЖНОГО И БЕДРЕННОГО КОМПОНЕНТОВ</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Tikhilov</surname><given-names>R. M.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Тихилов</surname><given-names>Р. М.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><email>info@rniito.org</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Shubnyakov</surname><given-names>I. I.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Шубняков</surname><given-names>И. И.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><email>shubnyakov@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Kovalenko</surname><given-names>A. N.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Коваленко</surname><given-names>А. Н.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><email>tonnchik@ya.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Tsybin</surname><given-names>A. V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Цыбин</surname><given-names>А. В.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><email>alex_tsybin@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Sementkovskiy</surname><given-names>A. V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Сементковский</surname><given-names>А. В.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><email>orthop@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Karpukhin</surname><given-names>A. S.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Карпухин</surname><given-names>А. С.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><email>fc@orthoscheb.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Bashinskiy</surname><given-names>O. A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Башинский</surname><given-names>О. А.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><email>oleg.bawin@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ФГБУ «Российский научно-исследовательский институт травматологии и ортопедии им. Р.Р. Вредена» Минздрава России</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Federal Centre of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Arthroplasty</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ФГБУ «Центр травматологии, ортопедии и эндопротезирования» Минздрава России</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2012-12-30" publication-format="electronic"><day>30</day><month>12</month><year>2012</year></pub-date><volume>18</volume><issue>4</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>5</fpage><lpage>16</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2016-11-01"><day>01</day><month>11</month><year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journal.rniito.org/jour/article/view/279">https://journal.rniito.org/jour/article/view/279</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The revision rate of total hip arthroplasty (THA) is increasing with growth of number primary THA. The problems of revision procedures are associated with high technical demands and high incidence of poor results. Besides of medical problems the cost of revisions has impact on health care system even in developed countries. With improving of funding Russian Health Care System there is significant growth of number of total hip arthroplasties in Russia. Hence it is interesting to find out about world experience, forecasts of experts involved in the issue and current trends in revision hip arthroplasty.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>На фоне постоянно увеличивающегося числа операций первичного эндопротезирования тазобедренного сустава наблюдается также увеличение абсолютного количества ревизионных вмешательств. Проблемы ревизий сопряжены с техническими трудностями их выполнения и высокой частотой неудовлетворительных результатов. Кроме проблем медицинского характера, совокупность ревизионных вмешательств оказывает финансовое давление на системы здравоохранения даже развитых стран, поднимая социально-экономические вопросы. В России, по мере улучшения финансирования здравоохранения, также наблюдается значительный рост количества операций эндопротезирования тазобедренного сустава. Представлены мировой опыт и прогнозы специалистов, занимающихся этой проблемой, а также современные тенденции в ревизионном протезировании тазобедренного сустава.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>ревизионное эндопротезирование тазобедренного сустава</kwd><kwd>бедренный компонент</kwd><kwd>вертлужный компонент</kwd><kwd>дефект костной ткани</kwd><kwd>hip revision arthroplasty</kwd><kwd>femoral stem</kwd><kwd>acetabular implant</kwd><kwd>bone defect</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Малыгин Р.В. Обоснование рациональной тактики лечения больных с перипротезными переломами бедренной кости [автореф. дис.. к-та мед. наук], Санкт-Петербург: РНИИТО им. Р.Р. Вредена; 2010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Сементковский А.В. Ревизионное эндопротезирова ние тазобедренного сустава при асептической нестабильности бедренного компонента эндопротеза (обзор литературы.) Травматология и ортопедия России. 2011;1(59): 153-159.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Тихилов Р.М., Воронкевич И.А., Малыгин Р.В., Ласунский С.А. Пластина для остеосинтеза перипротезных переломов бедренной кости. Травматология и ортопедия России. 2009; 2(52):117-122.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Тихилов Р.М., Сементковский А.В., Сивков В.С., Гончаров М.Ю., Малыгин Р.В. Применение бедренных бесцементных компонентов при ревизионном эндопротезировании тазобедренного сустава. Травматология и ортопедия России. 2011; 2(60):22-29.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Челноков А.Н., Пивень И.М., Бабушкин В.Н., Близнец Д.Г. Лечение перипротезных переломов бедра методом интрамедуллярного удлинения ножки эндопротеза. Хирургия тазобедренного сустава. 2012;1:122-130.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Травматизм, ортопедическая заболеваемость, состояние травматолого-ортопедической помощи населению России в 2008 году. ЦИТО, Москва 2009. 74 с.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Травматизм, ортопедическая заболеваемость, состояние травматолого-ортопедической помощи населению России в 2009году. ЦИТО, Москва 2010. 88 с.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Травматизм, ортопедическая заболеваемость, состояние травматолого-ортопедической помощи населению России в 2010 году. ЦИТО, Москва 2011. 92 с.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Aribindi R., Paprosky W., Nourbash P., Kronick J., Barba M. Extended proximal femoral osteotomy. Instr Course Lect. 1999;48:19-26.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Backstein D., Kosashvili Y., Safir O., Lakstein D., MacDonald. M., Gross A. E. Acetabular revisions using antiprotrusion (ilioishial) cage and trabecular metal cup constructs for severe acetabular bone loss associated with pelvic discontinuity. Preliminary results with 1 to 6 years follow-up, Orthopaedic Proceedings jbjs (br) July 2011 93-B: 275-275</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Bilgen O.F., Bilgen M.S., Oncan T., Dan M. Acetabular reconstruction by impacted cancellous allografts in cementless total hip arthroplasty revision. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2012;46(2):120-5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Blumenfeld T.J., Bargar W.L. Surgical technique: a cup-in-cup technique to restore offset in severe protrusio acetabular defects. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Feb;470(2):435-41.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Breer S., Hahn M., Kendoff D., Krause M., Koehne T., Haasper C., Gehrke T., Amling M., Gebauer M. Histological ex vivo analysis of retrieved human tantalum augmentations. Int Orthop. 2012 Nov;36(11):2269-74.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Burch-Schneider cage. Product information, surgical technique. Zimmer [Internet]. 2006. Avaible from: http://www.rpa.spot.pt/getdoc/9c3a8d36-1f2f-4087-915a-0ea395943b21/burch_schneider.aspx</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Busch V.J., Gardeniers J.W., Verdonschot N., Slooff T.J., Schreurs B.W. Acetabular reconstruction with impaction bone-grafting and a cemented cup in patients younger than fifty years old: a concise follow-up, at twenty to twenty-eight years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Feb 16;93(4):367-71.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Carroll F. A., Hoad-Reddick D. A., Kerry R. M., Stockley I. The survival of support rings in complex acetabular revision surgery, J Bone Joint Surg [Br]2008;90-B:574-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Chang J.D., Kim T.Y., Rao M.B., Lee S.S., Kim I.S. Revision total hip arthroplasty using a tapered, press-fit cementless revision stem in elderly patients. J Arthroplasty. 2011 Oct;26(7):1045-9. Epub 2011 May 12.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Chelnokov A., Piven I. Treatment of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures by Retrograde Stem Lengthening. Eur.J.Traum.Emerg.Surg. - Suppl. - 2011. - Vol. 37: Abstracts of the 12th European Congress of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, April 27-30 2011, Milan/Italy. - p.161.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>De Menezes D.F., Le Beguec P., Sieber H.P., Goldschild M. Stem and osteotomy length are critical for success of the transfemoral approach and cementless stem revision. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Mar;470(3):883-8. Epub 2011 Aug 6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Desai A.S., Dramis A., Board T.N., Hekal W., Farhan M.J. Acetabular revision surgery with the uncemented oblong BOFOR Cup - early to midterm results. Hip Int. 2012 May;22(3):280-5. doi: 10.5301/HIP.2012.9241.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Desbonnet P., Connes H., Escare P., Tricoire J.L., Trouillas J. Total hip revision using a cup design with a peg to treat severe pelvic bone defects. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012 May;98(3):346-51. Epub 2012 Apr 5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Dorman T., Kmiec K., Pogonowicz E., Sibinski M., Synder M., Kozlowski P. Hip revision arthroplasty in massive bone loss of acetabulum with the use of reinforcement ring. Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol. 2011 Jan-Feb;76(1):21-4. Polish.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Efe T., Schmitt J. Analyses of prosthesis stem failures in noncemented modular hip revision prostheses. J Arthroplasty. 2011 Jun;26(4):665.e7-12. Epub 2010 Jul 14.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Fink B., Grossmann A., Schulz M.S. Bone regeneration in the proximal femur following implantation of modular revision stems with distal fixation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011 Apr;131(4):465-70. Epub 2010 Jul 6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Garcia-Cimbrelo E., Garcia-Rey E., Cruz-Pardos A. The extent of the bone defect affects the outcome of femoral reconstruction in revision surgery with impacted bone grafting: a five- to 17-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Nov;93(11):1457-64.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Holt G, McCaul J, Jones B, Ingram R, Stark A. Outcome after femoral revision using the restoration cone/ conical femoral revision stem. Orthopedics. 2011 Jan 3;34(1):11.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Iorio R., Davis C.M. 3rd, Healy W.L., Fehring T.K, O'Connor M.I, York S. Impact of the economic downturn on adult reconstruction surgery: a survey of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. J Arthroplasty. 2010 Oct;25(7):1005-14.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Jacofsky D.J., McCamley J.D., Jaczynski A.M., Shrader M.W., Jacofsky M.C. Improving initial acetabular component stability in revision total hip arthroplasty calcium phosphate cement vs reverse reamed cancellous allograft. J Arthroplasty. 2012 Feb;27(2):305-9. Epub 2011 Jul 20.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Jakubowitz E., Kinkel S., Nadorf J., Heisel C., Kretzer J.P., Thomsen M.N. The effect of multifilaments and monofilaments on cementless femoral revision hip components: an experimental study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2011 Mar;26(3):257-61. Epub 2010 Dec 13.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Jones L., Grammatopoulos G., Singer G. The Burch-Schneider cage: 9-year survival in Paprosky type 3 acetabular defects. Clinical and radiological follow-up. Hip Int. 2012 Jan-Feb;22(1):28-34. doi: 10.5301/ HIP.2012.9078.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>Judl T., Jahoda D., Landor I., Pokorny D., Melichercik P., Sosna A. Cement-within-cement femoral stem reimplantation technique. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2011;78(5):416-22. Czech.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><mixed-citation>Kang P., Yang J., Zhou Z., Shen B., Pei F. Retention of a well-fixed acetabular component in the setting of acetabular osteolysis. Int Orthop. 2012 May;36(5):949-54. Epub 2012 Feb 21.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><mixed-citation>Kim K.C., Ha Y.C., Kang B.J., Lee Y.K., Ji H.M., Koo K.H. Use of cementless acetabular component with a hook and iliac flanges in revision arthroplasty for massive acetabular defect. J Orthop Sci. 2012 Jan;17(1):18-24. Epub 2011 Nov 18.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><mixed-citation>Koh K.H., Moon Y.W., Lim S.J., Lee H.I., Shim J.W., Park Y.S. Complete acetabular cup revision versus isolated liner exchange for polyethylene wear and osteolysis without loosening in cementless total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011 Nov;131(11):1591-600.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><mixed-citation>Kremers H.M., Howard J.L., Loechler Y., Schleck C.D., Harmsen W.S., Berry D.J., Cabanela M.E., Hanssen A.D., Pagnano M.W., Trousdale R.T., Lewallen D.G. Comparative long-term survivorship of uncemented acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Jun 20;94(12):e82.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><mixed-citation>Lamberton T.D., Kenny P.J., Whitehouse S.L., Timperley A.J., Gie G.A. Femoral impaction grafting in revision total hip arthroplasty: a follow-up of 540 hips. J Arthroplasty. 2011 Dec;26(8):1154-60. Epub 2011 May 13.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><mixed-citation>Lakemeier S., Peterlein C.D., Belz A., Timmesfeld N., Fuchs-Winkelmann S., Schofer M.D. Current status of revision total hip arthroplasty in Germany. Biomed Tech (Berl). 2010 Aug;55(4):219-27. German.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><label>38.</label><mixed-citation>Lakstein D., Eliaz N., Levi O., Backstein D., Kosashvili Y., Safir O., Gross A.E. Fracture of cementless femoral stems at the mid-stem junction in modular revision hip arthroplasty systems. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Jan 5;93(1):57-65.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B39"><label>39.</label><mixed-citation>Lazarinis S., K rrholm J., Hailer N.P. Effects of hydroxyapatite coating of cups used in hip revision arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2012 Oct;83(5):427-35. Epub 2012 Sep 3.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B40"><label>40.</label><mixed-citation>Laurer H.L, Wutzler S, Possner S, Geiger E.V, El Saman A, Marzi I, Frank J. Outcome after operative treatment of Vancouver type B1 and C periprosthetic femoral fractures: open reduction and internal fixation versus revision arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011 Jul;131(7):983-9. Epub 2011 Feb 18.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B41"><label>41.</label><mixed-citation>Lee J.M., Nam H.T. Acetabular revision total hip arthroplasty using an impacted morselized allograft and a cementless cup: minimum 10-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2011 Oct;26(7):1057-60.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B42"><label>42.</label><mixed-citation>Lenz M., Windolf M., Muckley T., Hofmann G.O., Wagner M., Richards R.G., Schwieger K., Gueorguiev B. The locking attachment plate for proximal fixation of periprosthetic femurfractures-a biomechanical comparison of two techniques. Int Orthop. 2012 Sep;36(9):1915-21. Epub 2012 May 27.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B43"><label>43.</label><mixed-citation>Lenz M., Gueorguiev B., Joseph S., van der Pol B., Richards R.G., Windolf M., Schwieger K., de Boer P. Angulated locking plate in periprosthetic proximal femur fractures: biomechanical testing of a new prototype plate. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012 Oct;132(10):1437-44. Epub 2012 Jun 17.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B44"><label>44.</label><mixed-citation>Lie S.A., Hallan G., Furnes O., Havelin L.I., Engesaeter L.B. Isolated acetabular liner exchange compared with complete acetabular component revision in revision of primary uncemented acetabular components: a study of 1649 revisions from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 May;89(5):591-4.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B45"><label>45.</label><mixed-citation>Lim S.J., Moon Y.W., Park Y.S. Is extended trochanteric osteotomy safe for use in 2-stage revision of periprosthetic hip infection? J Arthroplasty. 2011 Oct;26(7):1067-71. Epub 2011 Apr 15.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B46"><label>46.</label><mixed-citation>McPherson L., McPherson E.J., McTighe T. Cup Cage for Revision THA. Annual Meeting Poster Exhibit PO13, Adult Reconstruction Hip, AAOS, 2011. Joint Implant Surgery &amp; Research Foundation [Internet]. Avaible from: http://www.jisrf.org/pdf_files/Cup-Cage-Revision-THA.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B47"><label>47.</label><mixed-citation>Mertl P., Philippot R., Rosset P., Migaud H., Tabutin J., Van de Velde D. Distal locking stem for revision femoral loosening and peri-prosthetic fractures. Int Orthop. 2011 Feb;35(2):275-82. Epub 2010 Dec 24.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B48"><label>48.</label><mixed-citation>Meyer C., Alt V., Schroeder L., Heiss C., Schnettler R. Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures by effective lengthening of the prosthesis. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. - 2007 Oct; N 463 - P.120-127</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B49"><label>49.</label><mixed-citation>Nakano S., Yoshioka S., Tezuka F., Nakamura M., Chikawa T., Shimakawa T. New Surgical Treatment Using a Docking Nail for Postoperative Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture After Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012 Jun 29. [Epub ahead of print]</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B50"><label>50.</label><mixed-citation>Neumann D., Dueckelmann L., Thaler C., Dorn U. Revision total hip arthroplasty using a cementless tapered revision stem in patients with a mean age of 82 years. Int Orthop. 2012 May;36(5):961-5. Epub 2011 Oct 26.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B51"><label>51.</label><mixed-citation>O'Neill G.K., Maheshwari R., Willis C., Meek D., Patil S. Fracture of an Exeter 'cement in cement' revision stem: a case report. Hip Int. 2011 Sep-Oct;21(5):627-9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B52"><label>52.</label><mixed-citation>Ong K.L., Lau E., Suggs J., Kurtz S.M., Manley M.T. Risk of subsequent revision after primary and revision total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Nov;468(11):3070-6. Epub 2010 May 25.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B53"><label>53.</label><mixed-citation>Oshima S., Yasunaga Y., Yamasaki T., Yoshida T., Hori J., Ochi M. Midterm results of femoral impaction bone grafting with an allograft combined with hydroxyapatite in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012 Mar;27(3):470-6. Epub 2011 Sep 28.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B54"><label>54.</label><mixed-citation>Pabinger С., Wurzer P., Labek G., Bohler N. Revision rates after hip replacement: Over 200.000 patients followed up to 49 years. EFORT12-2427. EFORT Abstract Submission. Abstracts of 13th EFORT Congress 2012. [CD-ROM]. Berlin, May 2012.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B55"><label>55.</label><mixed-citation>Padgett D.E., Kinkel S. Cancellous impaction grafting in femoral revision THA. Orthopedics. 2011 Sep 9; 34(9):e482-4.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B56"><label>56.</label><mixed-citation>Patil N., Hwang K., Goodman S.B. Cancellous impaction bone grafting of acetabular defects in complex primary and revision total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2012 Mar 7;35(3):e306-12.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B57"><label>57.</label><mixed-citation>Pattyn C., Mulliez A., Verdonk R., Audenaert E. Revision hip arthroplasty using a cementless modular tapered stem. Int Orthop. 2012 Jan; 36(1):35-41. Epub 2011 Jun 24.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B58"><label>58.</label><mixed-citation>Park S.K., Kim Y.G, Kim S.Y. Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures in hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg. 2011 Jun;3(2):101-6. Epub 2011 May 12.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B59"><label>59.</label><mixed-citation>Pierannunzii L., Mambretti A., D'Imporzano M. Trabecular metal cup without augments for acetabular revision in case of extensive bone loss and low bone-prosthesis contact. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2011 Jan-Mar;24(1 Suppl 2):133-7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B60"><label>60.</label><mixed-citation>Regis D., Sandri A., Bonetti I., Braggion M., Bartolozzi P. Femoral revision with the Wagner tapered stem: a ten- to 15-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Oct;93(10):1320-6. Erratum in: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B61"><label>61.</label><mixed-citation>Restrepo C., Mashadi M., Parvizi J., Austin M.S., Hozack W.J. Modular femoral stems for revision total hip arthroplasty.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Feb; 469(2):476-82.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B62"><label>62.</label><mixed-citation>Rogers B.A., Whittingham-Jones P.M., Mitchell P.A., Safir O.A., Bircher M.D., Gross A.E. The Reconstruction of Periprosthetic Pelvic Discontinuity. J Arthroplasty. 2012 Feb 8. [Epub ahead of print]</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B63"><label>63.</label><mixed-citation>Sanguesa-Nebot M.J., Soriano F.C., Gabarda R.F., Mordt C.V. Revision hip arthroplasty with a short femoral component in fractured hydroxyapatite fully coated femoral stem. J. Arthroplasty. 2010 Oct;25(7):1168.e13-6. Epub 2009 Sep 2.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B64"><label>64.</label><mixed-citation>Skytta E.T., Eskelinen A., Paavolainen P.O., Remes V.M. Early results of 827 trabecular metal revision shells in acetabular revision. J. Arthroplasty. 2011 Apr; 26(3):342-5. Epub 2010 Oct 6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B65"><label>65.</label><mixed-citation>Sternheim A., Backstein D., Kuzyk P.R., Goshua G., Berkovich Y., Safir O., Gross A.E. Porous metal revision shells for management of contained acetabular bone defects at a mean follow-up of six years: a comparison between up to 50% bleeding host bone contact and more than 50% contact. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2012 Feb;94(2):158-62.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B66"><label>66.</label><mixed-citation>Taunton M.J., Fehring T.K., Edwards P., Bernasek T., Holt G.E., Christie M.J. Pelvic discontinuity treated with custom triflange component: a reliable option. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Feb;470(2):428-34.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B67"><label>67.</label><mixed-citation>Van Egmond N., De Kam D.C., Gardeniers J.W., Schreurs B.W. Revisions of extensive acetabular defects with impaction grafting and a cement cup. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2011 Feb;469(2):562-73. Epub 2010 Oct 8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B68"><label>68.</label><mixed-citation>Young P.S., Middleton R.G., Learmonth I.D., Minhas T.H. Conversion of a long distally fixed uncemented revision femoral stem to a proximally fixed implant following fatigue fracture. Hip Int. 2011 Nov-Dec; 21(6):766-9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B69"><label>69.</label><mixed-citation>Zampelis V., Ornstein E., Franzen H., Atroshi I. Firsttime revision using impacted morsellised allograft bone with a cemented Exeter stem: radiostereometric analysis of stem migration over nine years. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2011 Jun;93(6):746-50.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B70"><label>70.</label><mixed-citation>Zuurmond R.G., Pilot P., Verburg A.D. Retrograde bridging nailing of periprosthetic femoral fractures. Injury. - 2007. - Aug. - Vol.38, No. 8. - P.958-964.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B71"><label>71.</label><mixed-citation>Weeden S.H., Paprosky W.G. Porous-ingrowth revision acetabular implants secured with peripheral screws. A minimum twelve-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Jun; 88(6):1266-71.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B72"><label>72.</label><mixed-citation>Weiss R.J., Stark A., Karrholm J. A modular cementless stem vs. cemented long-stem prostheses in revision surgery of the hip: a population-based study from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop. 2011 Apr;82(2):136-42. Epub 2011 Mar 24.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
