<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="review-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Травматология и ортопедия России</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2311-2905</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2542-0933</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Vreden National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">17859</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17816/2311-2905-17859</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Reviews</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Обзоры</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="zh"><subject>Reviews</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Review Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Reverse Hip Replacement System: Addressing Instability Concerns or Introducing New Risks? A Scoping Review</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title/></trans-title-group><trans-title-group xml:lang="zh"><trans-title/></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0710-6487</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="scopus">57191749405</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Khalifa</surname><given-names>Ahmed A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname></surname><given-names></given-names></name><name xml:lang="zh"><surname></surname><given-names></given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="EG">Egypt</country></address><email>ahmed_adel0391@med.svu.edu.eg</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">1.	Orthopedic Department, Qena faculty of medicine and University Hospital, South valley university, Qena, Egypt.
2.	Orthopedic Department, Aster Sanad Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru"></institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="zh"></institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="preprint" iso-8601-date="2026-05-12" publication-format="electronic"><day>12</day><month>05</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>1</volume><issue>2</issue><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2026-03-17"><day>17</day><month>03</month><year>2026</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2026-04-23"><day>23</day><month>04</month><year>2026</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; , Eco-Vector</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; , Эко-Вектор</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="zh">Copyright ©; , Eco-Vector</copyright-statement><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Eco-Vector</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Эко-Вектор</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="zh">Eco-Vector</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journal.rniito.org/jour/article/view/17859">https://journal.rniito.org/jour/article/view/17859</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p><bold>Background:</bold> To address instability after total hip arthroplasty (THA), a reverse hip replacement system (RHRS) has been proposed, inspired by the concept of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. <bold>Objective:</bold> to evaluate the early functional, radiological, and complication outcomes of the RHRS. <bold>Methods:</bold> A systematic search in PubMed and Scopus databases was performed in March 2025 using predetermined search terms, which revealed an initial 656 results, and only four studies were eligible for inclusion (one biomechanical study and three clinical studies (one case series and two case reports)). <bold>Results:</bold> The three clinical studies included 24 patients aged 60 to 79 years; 13 (54.2%) were male, and all were diagnosed with advanced hip OA. After follow-up ranging from 3 weeks to 24 months, all patients were satisfied with the results, except for 2 (8.3%). Detailed function and PROM outcomes for 22 patients at 24 months of follow up showed significant improvement in WOMAC, HHS, OHS, HOOS, SF-36 physical component summary (PCS), and ED-5D (p&lt;0.05). However, there was a nonsignificant change in the SF-36 mental component summary (MCS) (p=0.272). Radiological outcomes, as determined by RSA analysis, at 24 months for 18 acetabular cups showed a mean migration of 0.087 ± 0.152 mm. Seven (29.2%) complication incidents, one intraoperative calcar crack, one deep PJI, one postoperative traumatic dislocation, one femoral neuropraxia, one occasional pain, and two recalcitrant iliotibial band syndrome. The biomechanical study results showed lower polyethylene wear debris equivalent to other systems, no wear debris due to metal-on-metal contact, and no signs of polyethylene edge or backside wear. <bold>Conclusion:</bold> Besides the promising biomechanical results, RHRS's early functional and radiological outcomes are encouraging; however, the incidence of complications is considerably high. Moreover, the results should be interpreted cautiously to the small number of included patients and the short follow up period.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p/></trans-abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="zh"><p/></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Reverse total hip arthroplasty</kwd><kwd>reverse total hip replacement</kwd><kwd>Reverse Hip Replacement System</kwd><kwd>instability</kwd><kwd>dislocation</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>1. Fontalis A, Epinette JA, Thaler M, Zagra L, Khanduja V, Haddad FS (2021) Advances and innovations in total hip arthroplasty. Sicot j 7:26. doi:10.1051/sicotj/2021025</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>2. Li Z (2025) Advancements of biomaterial in hip replacement technology incorporating ceramic materials. J Orthop 62:27-35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2024.09.021</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>3. Takahashi D, Shimizu T, Miyazaki T, Ogawa T, Iwasaki N (2023) Instability in total hip arthroplasty: A literature review. Journal of Joint Surgery and Research 1 (1):92-96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjoisr.2023.03.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>4. Sirignano MN, Nessler JM, Rhea EB, Ong KL, Watson HN, Yakkanti MR, Malkani AL (2023) Incidence of Instability Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Continues to Decline in the Medicare Population. J Arthroplasty 38 (7s):S89-S94.e81. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2023.04.035</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>5. Hernigou P, Barbier O, Chenaie P (2023) Hip arthroplasty dislocation risk calculator: evaluation of one million primary implants and twenty-five thousand dislocations with deep learning artificial intelligence in a systematic review of reviews. Int Orthop 47 (2):557-571. doi:10.1007/s00264-022-05644-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>6. Upfill-Brown A, Hsiue PP, Sekimura T, Patel JN, Adamson M, Stavrakis AI (2021) Instability Is the Most Common Indication for Revision Hip Arthroplasty in the United States: National Trends From 2012 to 2018. Arthroplast Today 11:88-101. doi:10.1016/j.artd.2021.08.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>7. Hermansen LL, Iversen TF, Iversen P, Viberg B, Overgaard S (2024) The "true" 1-year incidence of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: validation of an algorithm identifying dislocations in the Danish National Patient Register based on 5,415 patients from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 95:380-385. doi:10.2340/17453674.2024.41064</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>8. Zeng GJ, Sheng X, Lie DTT (2023) Short- to medium-term outcomes and future direction of reverse shoulder arthroplasty: Current concepts. Journal of ISAKOS 8 (6):398-403. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisako.2023.10.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>9. Franceschi F, Giovannetti de Sanctis E, Gupta A, Athwal GS, Di Giacomo G (2023) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty: State-of-the-art. Journal of ISAKOS 8 (5):306-317. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisako.2023.05.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>10. Hip Innovation Technology L (2015) Reverse HRS Product Overview. http://www.hipinnovationtechnology.com/product-information-innovation.html. Accessed 12-November 2025</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>11. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O'Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, Moher D, Peters MDJ, Horsley T, Weeks L, Hempel S, Akl EA, Chang C, McGowan J, Stewart L, Hartling L, Aldcroft A, Wilson MG, Garritty C, Lewin S, Godfrey CM, Macdonald MT, Langlois EV, Soares-Weiser K, Moriarty J, Clifford T, Tunçalp Ö, Straus SE (2018) PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann Intern Med 169 (7):467-473. doi:10.7326/m18-0850</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>12. Lombardi AV, Jr., Adams JB (2024) Use of a Novel Reverse Hip Replacement System to Address Dislocation and Instability. Surg Technol Int 44:263-270. doi:10.52198/24.Sti.44.Os1798</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>13. Turgeon TR, Hedden DR, Bohm ER, Burnell CD (2023) Radiostereometric analysis and clinical outcomes of a novel reverse total hip system at two years. Bone Jt Open 4 (5):385-392. doi:10.1302/2633-1462.45.Bjo-2023-0018.R1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>14. Zabinski SJ (2023) Case Study: Reverse Hip Replacement System May Provide Greater Stability – Especially with Spinal Pelvic Disorders. OrthoSpineNews. https://orthospinenews.com/2023/12/27/case-study-reverse-hip-replacement-system-may-provide-greater-stability-especially-with-spinal-pelvic-disorders/. Accessed 15-March 2025</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>15. Braddon L, Termanini Z, MacDonald S, Parvizi J, Lieberman J, Frankel V, Zuckerman J (2017) Corrosion and Tribology of Materials Used in a Novel Reverse Hip Replacement. Materials (Basel) 10 (7). doi:10.3390/ma10070751</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>16. Safety and Effectiveness of the HIT Reverse HRS. (2022) ClinicalTrials.gov. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05357378. Accessed 6-April 2025</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>17. van der Voort P, Pijls BG, Nieuwenhuijse MJ, Jasper J, Fiocco M, Plevier JW, Middeldorp S, Valstar ER, Nelissen RG (2015) Early subsidence of shape-closed hip arthroplasty stems is associated with late revision. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 24 RSA studies and 56 survival studies. Acta Orthop 86 (5):575-585. doi:10.3109/17453674.2015.1043832</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>18. Ozan F, Kahraman M, Baktır A, Gençer K (2021) Catastrophic failure and metallosis of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Res 16 (1):349. doi:10.1186/s13018-021-02492-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>19. Barakat N, Browne JA, Cui Q (2023) Catastrophic Early Failure and Fragmentation of a Modern Moderately Cross-linked Polyethylene Acetabular Liner. Arthroplast Today 22:101161. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2023.101161</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>20. Khalifa AA, Bakr HM (2021) Updates in biomaterials of bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty. Arthroplasty 3 (1):32. doi:10.1186/s42836-021-00092-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>21. Jaffar AA, Abass SJ, Ismael MQ (2006) Biomechanical aspects of shoulder and hip articulations: a comparison of two ball and socket joints. Al-Khwarizmi Engineering Journal 2 (1):1-14</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>22. Fabrocini B, Mercaldo N (2003) A Comparison between the Rotator Cuffs of the Shoulder and Hip. Strength &amp; Conditioning Journal 25 (4):63-68</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>23. Eltit F, Wang Q, Wang R (2019) Mechanisms of Adverse Local Tissue Reactions to Hip Implants. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 7:176. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2019.00176</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>24. Crowninshield RD, Maloney WJ, Wentz DH, Humphrey SM, Blanchard CR (2004) Biomechanics of large femoral heads: what they do and don't do. Clin Orthop Relat Res (429):102-107</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>25. Berliner JL, Regalado-Magdos A, Ma CB, Feeley BT (2015) Biomechanics of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 24 (1):150-160. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2014.08.003</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
