Traumatology and Orthopedics of RussiaTraumatology and Orthopedics of RussiaТравматология и ортопедия России2311-29052542-0933Vreden National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics1771510.17816/2311-2905-17715CLINICAL STUDIESКЛИНИЧЕСКИЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯClinical studiesResearch ArticleCross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Russian-language version of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOxFQ) in patients with foot and ankle disordersКросс-культурная адаптация и валидация русскоязычной версии опросника Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOxFQ) у пациентов с патологией стоп и голеностопных суставовhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3198-9985PashkovaEkaterina A.ПашковаЕкатерина Анатольевна
Russian Federation

Cand. Sci. (Med.)

канд. мед. наук

caterinapashkova@yandex.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9948-9015SorokinEvgenii P.СорокинЕвгений Петрович
Russian Federation

Cand. Sci. (Med.)

канд. мед. наук

Sorokinortoped@gmail.comhttps://orcid.org/0009-0000-2779-7564FaustovaYulia P.ФаустоваЮлия Павловна
Russian Federation
fausjulie99@mail.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2762-816XKonovalchukNikita S.КоновальчукНикита Сергеевич
Russian Federation

Cand. Sci. (Med.)

канд. мед. наук

konovalchuk91@yandex.ruhttps://orcid.org/0009-0000-3309-2560KubrinaTatiana N.КубринаТатьяна Николаевна
Russian Federation
Kubrina_1998@mail.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2239-2792DemyanovaKsenia A.ДемьяноваКсения Андреевна
Russian Federation
ksunyablack@yandex.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9569-1566PreobrazhenskyPetr M.ПреображенскийПетр Михайлович
Russian Federation

Cand. Sci. (Med.)

канд. мед. наук

pedrro@yandex.ruVreden National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and OrthopedicsФГБУ «Национальный медицинский исследовательский центр травматологии и ортопедии им. Р.Р. Вредена» Минздрава РоссииFirst Pavlov State Medical UniversityФГБОУ ВО «Первый Санкт-Петербургский государственный медицинский университет им. акад. И.П. Павлова» Минздрава РоссииVreden National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and OrthopedicsФГБУ «Национальный медицинский исследовательский центр травматологии и ортопедии им. Р.Р. Вредена» Минздрава России1407202515092025313961042404202530052025Copyright ©; 2025, Eco-VectorCopyright ©; 2025, Эко-ВекторCopyright ©; 2025,2025Eco-VectorЭко-Векторhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0https://journal.rniito.org/jour/article/view/17715

Background. The Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOxFQ) is one of the most validated and widely used tools assessing foot and ankle disorders based on patient-reported outcomes. To date, there has been no Russian-language version of the MOxFQ that has been adapted according to international methodological standards.

The aim of the study — to perform the cross-cultural adaptation and to assess the psychometric validity of the Russian-language version of the MOxFQ among patients with foot and ankle pathology.

Methods. The study enrolled 50 patients who were in the preoperative stage of treatment for foot and ankle joint disorders. The MOxFQ was translated and adapted following the ISPOR guidelines. All patients completed both the MOxFQ and EQ-5D-5L questionnaires. Test-retest reliability was assessed 7-14 days later in 38 patients who had not undergone surgery or other interventions during this period. Internal consistency (Cronbach’s α), test-retest reliability (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), minimal detectable change (MDC), floor and ceiling effects, and construct validity were evaluated.

Results. The Russian-language version of the MOxFQ showed high internal consistency (α = 0.878) and good test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.758). SEM accounted for 3.09 points; MDC — 8.55 points. No floor or ceiling effects were observed. Significant correlations were found between the total MOxFQ score and EQ-5D-5L domains (ρ = 0.599-0.745; p < 0.001), as well as with the VAS (ρ = -0.564; p < 0.001).

Conclusion. The Russian-language version of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire demonstrated strong psychometric properties and is recommended for use in clinical and research practice.

Актуальность. Манчестерско-Оксфордский опросник (Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire, MOxFQ) является одним из наиболее валидированных и широко применяемых инструментов для оценки состояния стопы и голеностопного сустава на основе самоотчетов пациентов. В настоящее время отсутствует русскоязычная версия MOxFQ, адаптированная в соответствии с международными методологическими стандартами.

Цель исследования — кросс-культурная адаптация и психометрическая валидация русскоязычной версии опросника MOxFQ у пациентов с патологией стопы и голеностопного сустава.

Материал и методы. В исследование вошли 50 пациентов, находившихся на предоперационном этапе лечения заболеваний стопы и голеностопного сустава. Были проведены перевод и адаптация MOxFQ по методологии ISPOR. Все пациенты заполнили опросники MOxFQ и EQ-5D-5L. Повторное анкетирование через 7–14 дней было проведено у 38 пациентов, не получавших хирургического или иного вмешательства в этот период. Оценивались внутренняя согласованность (α Кронбаха), тест-ретест надежность (ICC), стандартная ошибка измерения (SEM), минимально значимое различие (MDC), эффекты «пола» и «потолка», конструктная валидность.

Результаты. Русская версия MOxFQ показала высокую внутреннюю согласованность (α = 0,878) и хорошую воспроизводимость (ICC = 0,758). SEM составила 3,09 балла; MDC — 8,55 балла. Эффекты «пола» и «потолка» отсутствовали. Обнаружены значимые корреляции между итоговыми баллами MOxFQ и доменами EQ-5D-5L (ρ = 0,599–0,745; p < 0,001), а также с ВАШ (ρ = -0,564; p < 0,001).

Заключение. Русскоязычная версия MOxFQ продемонстрировала высокие психометрические свойства и может быть рекомендована для применения в клинической и исследовательской практике.

footankleMOxFQvalidationPROMquestionnaireEQ-5D-5Lстопаголеностопный суставMOxFQвалидацияPROMопросникEQ-5D-5LVieira Cardoso D., Dubois-Ferrière V., Hannouche D., Lübbeke A., Perneger T. Development and psychometric performance of the French language version of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ). Foot Ankle Surg. 2020;26(8):902-906. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2019.12.002.Dawson J., Coffey J., Doll H., Lavis G., Cooke P., Herron M. et al. A patient-based questionnaire to assess outcomes of foot surgery: validation in the context of surgery for hallux valgus. Qual Life Res. 2006;15(7):1211-1222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-006-0061-5.Terwee C.B., Prinsen C.A.C., Chiarotto A., Westerman M.J., Patrick D.L., Alonso J. et al. COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1159-1170. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1829-0.Morley D., Jenkinson C., Doll H., Lavis G., Sharp R., Cooke P. et al. The Manchester–Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ): Development and validation of a summary index score. Bone Joint Res. 2013;2(4):66-69. https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.24.2000147.Spindler F.T., Ettinger S., Arbab D., D. A. F. Scientific Committee, Baumbach S.F. Patient-reported outcome measures in studies on hallux valgus surgery: what should be assessed. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024;144(11):4745-4752. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s00402-024-05523-y.Goodall R., Borsky K, Harrison C.J., Welck M., Malhotra K., Rodrigues J.N. Structural validation of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire for use in foot and ankle surgery. Bone Joint J. 2024;106-B(3):256-261. https:// doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.106B3.BJJ-2023-0414.R3.Nguyen M.Q., Broström A., Iversen M.M., Harboe K., Paulsen A. Assessing the content validity of the Manchester–Oxford Foot Questionnaire in surgically treated ankle fracture patients: a qualitative study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023;18(1):941. https:// doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04418-9.Wild D., Grove A., Martin M., Eremenco S., McElroy S., Verjee-Lorenz A. et al. Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value Health. 2005;8(2):94-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x.Mokkink L.B., Terwee C.B., Patrick D.L., Alonso J., Stratford P.W., Knol D.L. et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(4):539-549. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8.EuroQol Research Foundation. EQ-5D-5L User Guide. Basic information on how to use the EQ-5D-5L instrument. Version 3.0. Rotterdam: EuroQol Research Foundation; 2019. Available from: https:// euroqol.org/publications/user-guidesJia Y., Huang H., Gagnier J.J. A systematic review of measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures for use in patients with foot or ankle diseases. Qual Life Res. 2017;26(8):1969-2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1542-4.Amri M.I., Alzhrani M.M., Alanazi A.D., Alqahtani M.M., Kashoo F.Z. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Arabic version of the foot function index in patients with chronic lateral ankle instability. J Foot Ankle Res. 2022;15(1):21. https:// doi.org/10.1186/s13047-022-00527-6.Ruiz-Muñoz M., González-Sánchez M., Li G.Z., Cuesta-Vargas A.I. Manchester–Oxford Foot Questionnaire Chinese version (MOXFQ-Ch): a validity and cross-cultural adaptation. Disabil Rehabil. 2021;43(1):104-111. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2019.1616834.Talu B., Bayramlar K., Bek N., Yakut Y. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire for hallux valgus deformity evaluation. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2016;50(2):207-213. https://doi.org/10.3944/AOTT.2015.15.0152.Garcés J.B., Winson I., Goldhahn S., Castro M.D., Swords M.P., Grujic L. et al. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Spanish Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) in patients with foot or ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Surg. 2016;22(1):59-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2015.09.004.Venkatesan S., Schotanus M.G., Hendrickx R.P. Dutch translation of the Manchester–Oxford Foot Questionnaire: reassessment of reliability and validity. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016;55(6):1199-1201. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2016.07.015.Pessoa G.B., Miranda B.R., Prates de Oliveira L.Z., Fernandes H.A., Ghani Abdul Ghani M.B.A., de Paula Neto A.C. et al. Translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire into Brazilian Portuguese. J Foot Ankle. 2022;16(3):231-236. https://doi.org/10.30795/jfootankle.2022.v16.1671.Mousavian A., Ebrahimzadeh M.H., Birjandinejad A., Omidi-Kashani F., Kachooei A.R. Translation and cultural adaptation of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) into Persian language. Foot. 2015;25(4): 224-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foot.2015.07.004.Park M.J., Ko Y.C., Huh J.W., Park S.H., Park T.H., Park, J.H. Validation of the Korean version of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire in patients with hallux valgus. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2017;56(2):252-254. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2016.11.013.Ponkilainen V.T., Miettinen M., Sandelin H., Lindahl J., Häkkinen A.H., Toom A. et al. Structural validity of the Finnish Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) using the Rasch model. Foot Ankle Surg. 2021;27(1): 93-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2020.02.012.McHorney C.A., Tarlov A.R. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res. 1995;4(4): 293-307. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01593882.