<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Травматология и ортопедия России</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2311-2905</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2542-0933</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Vreden National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1636</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21823/2311-2905-1636</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Lectures</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Лекции</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Miscellaneous</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Instrumental Diagnosis and Preoperative Planning of Hip Arthroscopy in Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: Lecture</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Инструментальная диагностика и предоперационное планирование артроскопии тазобедренного сустава при фемороацетабулярном импинджмент-синдроме: лекция</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4883-0543</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">9938-4303</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Bogopolskiy</surname><given-names>Oleg E.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Богопольский</surname><given-names>Олег Евгеньевич</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>врач травматолог-ортопед</p></bio><email>9202211@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Vreden National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ФГБУ «Национальный медицинский исследовательский центр травматологии и ортопедии им. Р.Р. Вредена» Минздрава России</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="preprint" iso-8601-date="2021-11-30" publication-format="electronic"><day>30</day><month>11</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2021-12-29" publication-format="electronic"><day>29</day><month>12</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>27</volume><issue>4</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>155</fpage><lpage>168</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2021-06-18"><day>18</day><month>06</month><year>2021</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2021-11-16"><day>16</day><month>11</month><year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2021, Bogopolskiy O.E.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2021, Богопольский О.Е.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2021</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Bogopolskiy O.E.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Богопольский О.Е.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journal.rniito.org/jour/article/view/1636">https://journal.rniito.org/jour/article/view/1636</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAI) is essentially a mechanical conflict that occurs when the acetabulum edge of the pelvic bone interacts with femur head and neck with clinical symptoms. In a basis of this conflict, as a rule, is a single or bilateral anatomical bone defect that causes an irregular shape of the hip joint with congenital or acquired etiology. Radiography, performed in a direct projection and in 45° Dunn position with external rotation of 40°, is traditionally considered as basic tool for the radiological diagnosis of hip joint pathology. It allows to assess the anatomical and morphological structure of joint surfaces and their relationship. Detection of severe hip deformations may require computed tomography (CT). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) is used to assess the condition of soft tissue structures of hip joint, its damage is often found in patients with FAI. The modern method of treating patients with FAI is hip arthroscopy, the undeniable advantage of which is low traumatic nature of the operation, low level of intraoperative complications and short postoperative rehabilitation period. For its successful implementation, it is necessary to take into account the complexity of performing hip arthroscopy, its duration, the necessity for good technical equipment and a high skill level of the operating surgeon. However, this operation has a number of limitations, which must be taken into account when selecting patients.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Фемороацетабулярный импинджмент (ФАИ) по своей сути является механическим конфликтом, возникающим при взаимодействии края вертлужной впадины с головкой и шейкой бедренной кости и сопровождающимся клиническими проявлениями. В основе этого конфликта, как правило, лежит одно- или двусторонний анатомический дефект костей, обуславливающий неправильную форму тазобедренного сустава (ТБС) врожденной или приобретенной этиологии. Базовым инструментом лучевой диагностики патологии области ТБС традиционно считается рентгенография, выполненная в прямой проекции и в положении Dunn 45° с наружной ротацией 40°, позволяющая оценить анатомо-морфологическое строение образующих сустав поверхностей и их взаимоотношение. Выявление выраженных деформаций ТБС может потребовать проведения компьютерной томографии. Для оценки состояния мягкотканных структур ТБС, повреждения которых часто встречаются у пациентов с ФАИ, используется магнитно-резонансная томография или магнитно-резонансная артрография. Современным методом лечения пациентов с ФАИ является артроскопия ТБС, к неоспоримым преимуществам которой можно отнести малую травматичность операции, низкий уровень интраоперационных осложнений и короткий послеоперационный реабилитационный период. Для ее успешного проведения необходимо учитывать сложность выполнения, длительность, потребность в хорошей технической оснащенности процесса и высокий уровнень мастерства оперирующего врача. Однако данная операция имеет ряд ограничений, что необходимо учитывать при отборе пациентов.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>hip arthroscopy</kwd><kwd>femoroacetabular impingement syndrome</kwd><kwd>acetabulum labrum rupture</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>артроскопия тазобедренного сустава</kwd><kwd>фемороацетабулярный импинджмент</kwd><kwd>повреждение суставной губы</kwd><kwd>лучевые методы диагностики</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Burman M.S. Arthroscopy or the direct visualization of joints: an experimental cadaver study. 1931. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;(390):5-9. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200109000-00003.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Bozic K.J., Chan V., Valone F.H. 3rd, Feeley B.T., Vail T.P. Trends in hip arthroscopy utilization in the United States. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(8 Suppl):140-143. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.02.039.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Colvin A.C., Harrast J., Harner C. Trends in hip arthroscopy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(4):e23. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01886.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Montgomery S.R., Ngo S.S., Hobson T., Nguyen S., Alluri R., Wang J.C. et al. Trends and demographics in hip arthroscopy in the United States. Arthroscopy. 2013;29(4):661-665. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.11.005.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Sing D.C., Feeley B.T., Tay B., Vail T.P., Zhang A.L. Age-Related Trends in Hip Arthroscopy: A Large Cross-Sectional Analysis. Arthroscopy. 2015;31(12):2307- 2313.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.06.008.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Zaltz I., Kelly B.T., Larson C.M., Leunig M., Bedi A. Surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement: what are the limits of hip arthroscopy? Arthroscopy. 2014;30(1):99-110. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.10.005.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Polesello G.C., Queiroz M.C., de Figueiredo M.J.P.S.S., Braga S.R., Ricioli W.J.r, Akkari M. Medial hip arthroscopy portals: a novel approach for hip pathologies. Is it feasible? Hip Int. 2017;27(3):e3-e5. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000495.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Lee Y.K., Ha Y.C., Yoon B.H., Koo K.H. National trends of hip arthroscopy in Korea. J Korean Med Sci. 2014;29(2):277-280. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2014.29.2.277.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Bogunovic L., Gottlieb M., Pashos G., Baca G., Clohisy J.C. Why do hip arthroscopy procedures fail? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(8):2523-2529. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3015-6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Haviv B., O’Donnell J. The incidence of total hip arthroplasty after hip arthroscopy in osteoarthritic patients. Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol. 2010;2:18. doi: 10.1186/1758-2555-2-18.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Gupta A., Redmond J.M., Stake C.E., Dunne K.F., Domb B.G. Does Primary Hip Arthroscopy Result in Improved Clinical Outcomes?: 2-Year Clinical Follow-up on a Mixed Group of 738 Consecutive Primary Hip Arthroscopies Performed at a High-Volume Referral Center. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(1):74-82. doi: 10.1177/0363546514562563.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Philippon M.J., Briggs K.K., Carlisle J.C., Patterson D.C. Joint space predicts THA after hip arthroscopy in patients 50 years and older. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(8):2492-2496. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2779-4.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Philippon M.J., Schroder E., Souza B.G., Briggs K.K. Hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement in patients aged 50 years or older. Arthroscopy. 2012;28(1):59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.07.004.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Bogunovic L., Gottlieb M., Pashos G., Baca G., Clohisy J.C. Why do hip arthroscopy procedures fail? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(8):2523-2529. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3015-6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Griffin D.R., Dickenson E.J., O’Donnell J., Agricola R., Awan T., Beck M. et al. The Warwick Agreement on femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAI syndrome): an international consensus statement. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(19):1169-1176. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096743.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Reiman M.P., Agricola R., Kemp J.L., Heerey J.J., Weir A., van Klij P. et al. Consensus recommendations on the classification, definition and diagnostic criteria of hip-related pain in young and middle-aged active adults from the International Hip-related Pain Research Network, Zurich 2018. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54(11):631-641. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2019-101453.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Hong S.J., Shon W.Y., Lee C.Y., Myung J.S., Kang C.H., Kim B.H. Imaging findings of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: focusing on mixed-type impingement. Clin Imaging. 2010;34(2):116-120. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2009.04.025.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Tannast M., Siebenrock K.A., Anderson S.E. Femoroacetabular impingement: radiographic diagnosis--what the radiologist should know. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188(6):1540-1552. doi: 10.2214/AJR.06.0921.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Jaberi F.M., Parvizi J. Hip pain in young adults: femoroacetabular impingement. J Arthroplasty. 2007; 22(7 Suppl 3):37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.05.039.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Doran C., Pettit M., Singh Y., Sunil Kumar K.H., Khanduja V. Does the Type of Sport Influence Morphology of the Hip? A Systematic Review. Am J Sports Med. 2021:3635465211023500. doi: 10.1177/03635465211023500.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Zhou J., Melugin H.P., Hale R.F., Leland D.P., Bernard C.D., Levy B.A. et al. The Prevalence of Radiographic Findings of Structural Hip Deformities for Femoroacetabular Impingement in Patients With Hip Pain. Am J Sports Med. 2020;48(3):647-653. doi: 10.1177/0363546519896355.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Блищ О.Ю. Боль в тазобедренном суставе: современные представления о возможностях и роли различных методов лучевой диагностики в определении причин болевого синдрома. Лучевая диагностика и терапия. 2014;(2):37-45. doi: 10.22328/2079-5343-2014-2-37-45.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Blisch O.Yu. [Hip pain: MRI potential for diagnostics Hip pain causes. Diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy]. Luchevaya diagnostika i terapiya [Diagnostic Radiology and Radiotherapy]. 2014;(2):37-45. (In Russian). doi: 10.22328/2079-5343-2014-2-37-45.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Тихилов Р.М., Шубняков И.И. Руководство по хирургии тазобедренного сустава. СПб.; 2014. Т.1. 368 с.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Tikhilov R.M., Shubnyakov I.I. Guide to Hip Surgery. St. Petersburg; 2014. Vol. 1. 368 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Тихилов Р.М., Шубняков И.И., Плиев Д.Г., Богопольский О.Е., Гуацаев М.С. Возможности рентгенографии в ранней диагностике патологии тазобедренного сустава. Травматология и ортопедия России. 2017;23(1):117-131. doi: 10.21823/2311-2905-2017-23-1-117-131.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Tikhilov R.M., Shubnyakov I.I., Pliev D.G., Bogopolsky O.Y., Guatsaev M.S. [Roentgenography potentialities for early diagnosis of Hip pathologies]. Travmatologiya i ortopediya Rossii [Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia]. 2017;23(1):117-131. (In Russian). doi: 10.21823/2311-2905-2017-23-1-117-131.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Lim S.J., Park, Y.S. Plain Radiography of the Hip: A Review of Radiographic Techniques and Image Features. Hip Pelvis. 2015;27(3):125-134. doi: 10.5371/hp.2015.27.3.125.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Polesello G.C., Nakao T.S., de Queiroz M.C., Daniachi D., Ricioli W.Jr, Guimarães R.P. et al. Proposal for standardization of radiographic studies on the hip and pelvis. Giancarlo Rev Bras Ortop. 2015;46(6):634-642. doi: 10.1016/s2255-4971(15)30318-9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Siebenrock K.A., Kalbermatten D.F., Ganz R. Effect of pelvic tilt on acetabular retroversion: a study of pelves from cadavers. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;(407):241-248. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200302000-00033.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>Tannast M., Zheng G., Anderegg C., Burckhardt K., Langlotz F., Ganz R. et al. Tilt and rotation correction of acetabular version on pelvic radiographs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;438:182-190. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000167669.26068.c5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><mixed-citation>The adult hip: hip preservation surgery. Ed. by J.C. Clohisy et al. Philadelphia: Wolters kluwer Health; 2015. Ch. 12. р. 131-143.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><mixed-citation>Zilber S., Lazennec J.Y., Gorin M., Saillant G. Variations of caudal, central, and cranial acetabular anteversion according to the tilt of the pelvis. Surg Radiol Anat. 2004;26(6):462-465. doi: 10.1007/s00276-004-0254-y.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><mixed-citation>Rosinsky P.J., Chen J.W., Lall A.C., Wojnowski N.M., Shapira J., Maldonado D.R. et al. Can Radiographic Joint Space Accurately Predict Chondral Damage During Hip Arthroscopy? A Cross-Sectional Analysis. Arthroscopy. 2020;36(6):1565-1572.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.01.034.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><mixed-citation>Ogata S., Moriya H., Tsuchiya k., Akita T., Kamegaya M., Someya M. Acetabular cover in congenital dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72(2):190-196. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.72B2.2312554.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><mixed-citation>Chandrasekaran S., Darwish N., Chaharbakhshi E.O., Suarez-Ahedo C., Lodhia P., Domb B.G. Minimum 2-Year Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopic Surgery in Patients With Acetabular Overcoverage and Profunda Acetabulae Compared With Matched Controls With Normal Acetabular Coverage. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(11): 2483-2492. doi: 10.1177/0363546517708769.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><mixed-citation>Evans P.T., Redmond J.M., Hammarstedt J.E., Liu Y., Chaharbakhshi E.O., Domb B.G. Arthroscopic Treatment of Hip Pain in Adolescent Patients With Borderline Dysplasia of the Hip: Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up. Arthroscopy. 2017;33(8):1530-1536. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.03.008.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><label>38.</label><mixed-citation>Kling S., Karns M.R., Gebhart J., Kosmas C., Robbin M., Nho S.J. et al. The effect of acetabular rim recession on anterior acetabular coverage: a cadaveric study using the false-profile radiograph. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(4):957-964. doi: 10.1177/0363546515571918.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B39"><label>39.</label><mixed-citation>Maldonado D.R., LaReau J.M., Perets I., Ortiz-Declet V., Laseter J.R., Lall A.C. et al. Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopy With Concomitant Periacetabular Osteotomy, Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up. Arthroscopy. 2019;35(3):826-834. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.10.143.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B40"><label>40.</label><mixed-citation>Jamali A.A., Mladenov K., Meyer D.C., Martinez A., Beck M., Ganz R. et al. Anteroposterior pelvic radiographs to assess acetabular retroversion: high validity of the «cross-over-sign». J Orthop Res. 2007;25(6):758-765. doi: 10.1002/jor.20380.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B41"><label>41.</label><mixed-citation>Reynolds D., Lucas J., Klaue K. Retroversion of the acetabulum. A cause of hip pain. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81(2):281-288. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.81b2.8291.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B42"><label>42.</label><mixed-citation>Kalberer F., Sierra R.J., Madan S.S., Ganz R., Leunig M. Ischial spine projection into the pelvis: a new sign for acetabular retroversion. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(3):677-683. doi: 10.1007/s11999-007-0058-6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B43"><label>43.</label><mixed-citation>Werner C.M., Copeland C.E., Ruckstuhl T., Stromberg J., Turen C.H., Kalberer F. et al. Radiographic markers of acetabular retroversion: correlation of the cross-over sign, ischial spine sign and posterior wall sign. Acta Orthop Belg. 2010;76(2):166-173.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B44"><label>44.</label><mixed-citation>Vahedi H., Aalirezaie A., Schlitt P.K., Parvizi J. Acetabular Retroversion Is a Risk Factor for Less Optimal Outcome After Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery. J Arthroplasty. 2019;34(7):1342-1346. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.050.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B45"><label>45.</label><mixed-citation>Litrenta J., Mu B., Chen A.W., Ortiz-Declet V., Perets I., Domb B.G. Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Adolescents With Acetabular Retroversion Treated Arthroscopically. J Pediatr Orthop. 2019;39(10):510-515. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001063.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B46"><label>46.</label><mixed-citation>Crockarell J.R. Jr., Trousdale R.T., Guyton J.L. The anterior centre-edge angle. A cadaver study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82(4):532-534. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.82b4.10063.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B47"><label>47.</label><mixed-citation>Hetsroni I., Poultsides L., Bedi A., Larson C.M., Kelly B.T. Anterior inferior iliac spine morphology correlates with hip range of motion: a classification system and dynamic model. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(8):2497-2503. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2847-4.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B48"><label>48.</label><mixed-citation>Nötzli H.P., Wyss T.F., Stoecklin C.H., Schmid M.R., Treiber K., Hodler J. The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84(4):556-560. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.84b4.12014.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B49"><label>49.</label><mixed-citation>Barton C., Salineros M.J., Rakhra K.S., Beaulé P.E. Validity of the alpha angle measurement on plain radiographs in the evaluation of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(2):464-469. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1624-x.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B50"><label>50.</label><mixed-citation>Pfirrmann C.W., Mengiardi B., Dora C., Kalberer F., Zanetti M., Hodler J. Cam and pincer femoroacetabular impingement: characteristic MR arthrographic findings in 50 patients. Radiology. 2006;240(3):778-785. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2403050767.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B51"><label>51.</label><mixed-citation>Zhou J., Melugin H.P., Hale R.F., Leland D.P., Bernard C.D., Levy B.A. et al. The Prevalence of Radiographic Findings of Structural Hip Deformities for Femoroacetabular Impingement in Patients With Hip Pain. Am J Sports Med. 2020;48(3):647-653. doi: 10.1177/0363546519896355.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B52"><label>52.</label><mixed-citation>Gosvig K.K., Jacobsen S., Palm H., Sonne-Holm S., Magnusson E. A new radiological index for assessing asphericity of the femoral head in cam impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89(10):1309-1316. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B10.19405.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B53"><label>53.</label><mixed-citation>Sutter R., Dietrich T.J., Zingg P.O., Pfirrmann C.W. How useful is the alpha angle for discriminating between symptomatic patients with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement and asymptomatic volunteers? Radiology. 2012;264(2):514-521. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12112479.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B54"><label>54.</label><mixed-citation>Mascarenhas V.V., Rego P., Dantas P., Morais F., McWilliams J., Collado D. et al. Imaging prevalence of femoroacetabular impingement in symptomatic patients, athletes, and asymptomatic individuals: A systematic review. Eur J Radiol. 2016;85(1):73-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.10.016.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B55"><label>55.</label><mixed-citation>Ross J.R., Bedi A., Stone R.M., Sibilsky Enselman E., Leunig M., Kelly B.T. et al. Intraoperative Fluoroscopic Imaging to Treat Cam Deformities: Correlation With 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(6):1370-1376. doi: 10.1177/0363546514529515.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B56"><label>56.</label><mixed-citation>Larson C.M., Wulf C.A. Intraoperative fluoroscopy for evaluation of bony resection during arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement in the supine position. Arthroscopy. 2009;25(10):1183-1192. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.07.020.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B57"><label>57.</label><mixed-citation>Meyer D.C., Beck M., Ellis T., Ganz R., Leunig M. Comparison of six radiographic projections to assess femoral head/neck asphericity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;445:181-185. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000201168.72388.24.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B58"><label>58.</label><mixed-citation>Domayer S.E., Ziebarth K., Chan J., Bixby S., Mamisch T.C., Kim Y.J. Femoroacetabular cam-type impingement: diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of radiographic views compared to radial MRI. Eur J Radiol. 2011;80(3):805-810. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.10.016.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B59"><label>59.</label><mixed-citation>Clohisy J.C., Carlisle J.C., Beaulé P.E., Kim Y.J., Trousdale R.T., Sierra R.J. et al. A systematic approach to the plain radiographic evaluation of the young adult hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90(Suppl 4):47-66. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00756.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B60"><label>60.</label><mixed-citation>Harris M.D., Kapron A.L., Peters C.L., Anderson A.E. Correlations between the alpha angle and femoral head asphericity: Implications and recommendations for the diagnosis of cam femoroacetabular impingement. Eur J Radiol. 2014;83(5):788-796. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.02.005.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B61"><label>61.</label><mixed-citation>Ross J.R., Schoenecker P.L., Clohisy J.C. Surgical dislocation of the hip: evolving indications. HSS J. 2013;9(1):60-69. doi: 10.1007/s11420-012-9323-7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B62"><label>62.</label><mixed-citation>Sutter R., Zanetti M., Pfirrmann C.W. New developments in hip imaging. Radiology. 2012;264(3):651-667. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12110357.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B63"><label>63.</label><mixed-citation>Kaplan D.J., Samim M., Burke C.J., Meislin R.J., Youm T. Validity of magnetic resonance imaging measurement of hip labral width compared with intraoperative assessment. Arthroscopy. 2020;36(3):751-758. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.09.027.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B64"><label>64.</label><mixed-citation>Sankar W.N., Matheney T.H., Zaltz I. Femoroacetabular impingement: current concepts and controversies. Orthop Clin North Am. 2013;44(4):575-589. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2013.07.003.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B65"><label>65.</label><mixed-citation>Volpon J.B. Femoroacetabular impingement. Rev Bras Ortop. 2016;51(6):621-629. doi: 10.1016/j.rboe.2016.10.006.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B66"><label>66.</label><mixed-citation>Sutter R., Zubler V., Hoffmann A., Mamisch-Saupe N., Dora C., Kalberer F. et al. Hip MRI: how useful is intraarticular contrast material for evaluating surgically proven lesions of the labrum and articular cartilage? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202(1):160-169. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.10266.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B67"><label>67.</label><mixed-citation>Smith T.O., Simpson M., Ejindu V., Hing C.B. The diagnostic test accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance arthrography and computer tomography in the detection of chondral lesions of the hip. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2013;23(3):335-344. doi: 10.1007/s00590-012-0972-5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B68"><label>68.</label><mixed-citation>Smith T.O., Hilton G., Toms A.P., Donell S.T., Hing C.B. The diagnostic accuracy of acetabular labral tears using magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance arthrography: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2011;21(4):863-874. doi: 10.1007/s00330-010-1956-7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B69"><label>69.</label><mixed-citation>Yoon L.S., Palmer W.E., Kassarjian A. Evaluation of radial-sequence imaging in detecting acetabular labral tears at hip MR arthrography. Skeletal Radiol. 2007;36(11):1029-1033. doi: 10.1007/s00256-007-0363-x.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B70"><label>70.</label><mixed-citation>Riley G.M., McWalter E.J., Stevens K.J., Safran M.R., Lattanzi R., Gold G.E. MRI of the hip for the evaluation of femoroacetabular impingement; past, present, and future. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;41(3):558-572. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24725.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B71"><label>71.</label><mixed-citation>Smith T.O., Hilton G., Toms A.P., Donell S.T., Hing C.B. The diagnostic accuracy of acetabular labral tears using magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance arthrography: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2011;21(4):863-874. doi: 10.1007/s00330-010-1956-7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B72"><label>72.</label><mixed-citation>Crespo-Rodríguez A.M., De Lucas-Villarrubia J.C., Pastrana-Ledesma M., Hualde-Juvera A., Méndez-Alonso S., Padron M. The diagnostic performance of non-contrast 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (3-T MRI) versus 1.5-Tesla magnetic resonance arthrography (1.5-T MRA) in femoro-acetabular impingement. Eur J Radiol. 2017;88:109-116. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.12.031.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B73"><label>73.</label><mixed-citation>Foreman S.C., Zhang A.L., Neumann J., von Schacky C.E., Souza R.B., Majumdar S. et al. Postoperative MRI Findings and Associated Pain Changes After Arthroscopic Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020;214(1):177-184. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.21421.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B74"><label>74.</label><mixed-citation>Rajeev A., Tuinebreijer W., Mohamed A., Newby M. The validity and accuracy of MRI arthrogram in the assessment of painful articular disorders of the hip. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018;28(1):71-77. doi: 10.1007/s00590-017-2022-9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B75"><label>75.</label><mixed-citation>Saupe N., Zanetti M., Pfirrmann C.W., Wels T., Schwenke C., Hodler J. Pain and other side effects after MR arthrography: prospective evaluation in 1085 patients. Radiology. 2009;250(3):830-838. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2503080276.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B76"><label>76.</label><mixed-citation>Blankenbaker D.G., De Smet A.A., Keene J.S., Fine J.P. Classification and localization of acetabular labral tears. Skeletal Radiol. 2007;36(5):391-397. doi: 10.1007/s00256-006-0240-z.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B77"><label>77.</label><mixed-citation>Suarez-Ahedo C., Gui C., Rabe S.M., Chandrasekaran S., Lodhia P., Domb B.G. Acetabular Chondral Lesions in Hip Arthroscopy: Relationships Between Grade, Topography, and Demographics. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(11): 2501-2506. doi: 10.1177/0363546517708192.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B78"><label>78.</label><mixed-citation>Pfirrmann C.W., Duc S.R., Zanetti M., Dora C., Hodler J. MR arthrography of acetabular cartilage delamination in femoroacetabular cam impingement. Radiology. 2008;249(1):236-241. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2491080093.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B79"><label>79.</label><mixed-citation>Konan S., Rayan F., Meermans G., Witt J., Haddad F.S. Validation of the classification system for acetabular chondral lesions identified at arthroscopy in patients with femoroacetabular impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(3):332-336. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B3.25322.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B80"><label>80.</label><mixed-citation>Griffin J.W., Weber A.E., Kuhns B., Lewis P., Nho S.J. Imaging in Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Comprehensive Approach. Clin Sports Med. 2016;35(3):331-344. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2016.02.002.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B81"><label>81.</label><mixed-citation>Studler U., Kalberer F., Leunig M., Zanetti M., Hodler J., Dora C. et al. MR arthrography of the hip: differentiation between an anterior sublabral recess as a normal variant and a labral tear. Radiology. 2008;249(3):947-954. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2492080137.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B82"><label>82.</label><mixed-citation>DuBois D.F., Omar I.M. MR imaging of the hip: normal anatomic variants and imaging pitfalls. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2010;18(4):663-674. doi: 10.1016/j.mric.2010.09.003.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B83"><label>83.</label><mixed-citation>Bredella M.A., Ulbrich E.J., Stoller D.W., Anderson S.E. Femoroacetabular impingement. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2013;21(1):45-64. doi: 10.1016/j.mric.2012.08.012.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B84"><label>84.</label><mixed-citation>Kassarjian A., Yoon L.S., Belzile E., Connolly S.A., Millis M.B., Palmer W.E. Triad of MR arthrographic findings in patients with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement. Radiology. 2005;236(2):588-592. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2362041987.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B85"><label>85.</label><mixed-citation>Ganz R., Leunig M., Leunig-Ganz K., Harris W.H. The etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip: an integrated mechanical concept. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(2):264-272. doi: 10.1007/s11999-007-0060-z.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B86"><label>86.</label><mixed-citation>Werlen S., Leunig M., Ganz R. Magnetic Resonance Arthrography of the Hip in Femoroacetabular Impingement: Technique and Findings. Operativ Tech Orthopaedics. 2005;15(3):191-203. doi: 10.1053/j.oto.2005.07.007.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B87"><label>87.</label><mixed-citation>Blankenbaker D.G., Tuite M.J., Keene J.S., A. Munoz del Rio. Labral injuries due to iliopsoas impingement: can they be diagnosed on MR arthrography? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199(4):894-900. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.8211.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B88"><label>88.</label><mixed-citation>Ilizaliturri V.M. Jr., Suarez-Ahedo Cю, Acuña M. Internal Snapping Hip Syndrome: Incidence of Multiple-Tendon Existence and Outcome After Endoscopic Transcapsular Release. Arthroscopy. 2015;31(10):1991-1995. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.04.083.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B89"><label>89.</label><mixed-citation>Samim M., Eftekhary N., Vigdorchik J.M., Elbuluk A., Davidovitch R., Youm T. et al. 3D-MRI versus 3D-CT in the evaluation of osseous anatomy in femoroacetabular impingement using Dixon 3D FLASH sequence. Skeletal Radiol. 2019;48(3):429-436. doi: 10.1007/s00256-018-3049-7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B90"><label>90.</label><mixed-citation>Li A.E., Jawetz S.T., Greditzer H.G. 4th, Burge A.J., Nawabi D.H., Potter H.G. MRI for the preoperative evaluation of femoroacetabular impingement. Insights Imaging. 2016;7(2):187-198. doi: 10.1007/s13244-015-0459-0.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B91"><label>91.</label><mixed-citation>Sutter R., Dietrich T.J., Zingg P.O., Pfirrmann C.W. Assessment of Femoral Antetorsion With MRI: Comparison of Oblique Measurements to Standard Transverse Measurements. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015;205(1):130-135. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13617.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B92"><label>92.</label><mixed-citation>Sutter R., Dietrich T.J., Zingg P.O., Pfirrmann C.W. Femoral antetorsion: comparing asymptomatic volunteers and patients with femoroacetabular impingement. Radiology. 2012;263(2):475-483. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12111903.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B93"><label>93.</label><mixed-citation>Lall A.C., Battaglia M.R., Maldonado D.R., Perets I., Laseter J.R., Go C.C. et al. Does Femoral Retroversion Adversely Affect Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome? A Midterm Analysis. Arthroscopy. 2019;35(11):3035-3046. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.03.046.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B94"><label>94.</label><mixed-citation>Menge T.J., Briggs K.K., Dornan G.J., McNamara S.C., Philippon M.J. Survivorship and Outcomes 10 Years Following Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement: Labral Debridement Compared with Labral Repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(12):997-1004. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01060.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B95"><label>95.</label><mixed-citation>Yoo J.I., Ha Y.C., Hwang S.C., Oh J.Y., Chang E.C., Lee Y.K. et al. Factors Associated with the Risk of Articular Surface Perforation during Anchor Placement for Arthroscopic Acetabular Labral Repair. Clin Orthop Surg. 2017;9(4):405-412. doi: 10.4055/cios.2017.9.4.405.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
