<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Травматология и ортопедия России</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2311-2905</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2542-0933</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Vreden National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">137</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21823/2311-2905-137</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>EXPERIENCE EXCHANGE</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ОБМЕН ОПЫТОМ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="zh"><subject>Experience exchange</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Unknown</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Analysis of the unicompartmental knee arthroplasty results</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Анализ ранних результатов одномыщелкового эндопротезирования коленного сустава</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Firsov</surname><given-names>S. A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Фирсов</surname><given-names>С. А.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><email>serg375@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Gagarin</surname><given-names>V. V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Гагарин</surname><given-names>В. В.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Railway Clinical Hospital in Yaroslav Station</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">НУЗ «Дорожная клиническая больница на ст. Ярославль» ОАО РЖД</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2015-09-12" publication-format="electronic"><day>12</day><month>09</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>99</fpage><lpage>105</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2016-09-12"><day>12</day><month>09</month><year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2015,</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2015,</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2015</copyright-year><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journal.rniito.org/jour/article/view/137">https://journal.rniito.org/jour/article/view/137</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>In 2012-2014 total 67 unicompartmental arthroplasty surgeries with use of Oxford knee meniscal bearing were performed. The surgeries were performed by a single surgeon. Minimally invasive approach was used. All patients were evaluated clinically, radiographically and with Oxford Knee score scale, Knee Society score scale and functional scale. Obtained data was processed with nonparametric Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test. Results were processed using the statistical analysis application package SPSS, version 10.07. Analysis of of mid-term results showed that the average for Oxford Knee score increased from 16.4 (95% CI 9-23) to 41.3 (95% CI 29-47). Average for Knee Society score scale increased from 42.7 (95% CI 31-55) to 88.6 (95% CI 73-100). No occurrence of early postoperative complications have been reported. Statistically significant improvements of knee function in patients after unicompartmental arthroplasty have been observed. Unicompartmental arthroplasty currently can be considered as an advanced treatment option for medial knee joint pathology. Meniscal bearing cemented prostheses such as Oxford III are preferable.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>За период с 2012 по 2014 г. в центре травматологии и ортопедии НУЗ «Дорожная клиническая больница на ст. Ярославль» было выполнено 67 операций одномыщелкового эндопротезирования внутренних отделов коленного сустава с использованием конструкции Oxford III. Все операции выполнялись одним хирургом из малоинвазивного доступа. результаты оценивались клинически, рентгенологически и по шкалам Oxford Knee score, Knee Society score и функциональной шкале. Полученные в процессе исследования данные обрабатывались с использованием непараметрического метода Вилкоксона - Манна - Уитни. Обработка полученных результатов проводилась с использованием пакета прикладных программ статистического анализа SPSS (версия 10.07). При анализе среднесрочных результатов через год после эндопротезирования средний балл по шкале Oxford Knee score увеличился в среднем с 16,4 балла (95% ДИ от 9 до 23) до 41,3 балла (95% ДИ от 29 до 47). По шкале Knee Society score средний балл вырос с 42,7 баллов (95% ДИ от 31 до 55) до 88,6 баллов (95% ДИ от 73 до 100). ранних послеоперационных осложнений у пациентов отмечено не было. Выявлено статистически значимое улучшение функции в коленном суставе у пациентов после одномыщелкового эндопротезирования. Выводы. Одномыщелковое эндопротезирование в настоящее время является более совершенным методом лечения при патологии медиальных отделов коленного сустава.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>одномыщелковое эндопротезирование коленного сустава</kwd><kwd>unicompartmental arthroplasty</kwd><kwd>knee joint</kwd><kwd>meniscal bearing</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Корнилов Н.Н., Куляба Т.А. Артропластика коленного сустава. СПб., 2012. 228 с.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Berger R.A., Nedeff D.D., Barden R.M., Sneinkop M.M., JacobsJ.J., RosenbergA.G., GalanteJ.O. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clinical experience at 6- to 10-year follow-up. Clin Orthop. 1999; (367):50-60.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Cheng T., Chen D., Zhu C., Pan X., Mao X., Guo Y., Zhang X. Fixed-versus mobile-bearing unicondylar knee arthroplasty: are failure modes different? Knee Surg, Sports Traumatol, Arthroscopy. 2013; 21(11):2433-2441.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Danilidis K., Skwara A., Skuginna A., Ficher F. Comparison of medium-term clinical and radiological outcome between cemented and cementless medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Z Orthop Unfall. 2009; 147(2):188-193.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Furnes O., Espehaug B., Lie S.A., Vollset S.E. Failure mechanisms after unicompartmental and tricompartmental primary knee replacement with cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89(3):519-525.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Goodfellow J., O’Connor J., Dodd C., Murray D. Unicompartmental arthroplasty with the Oxford knee. Nev York: Oxford University Press, 2006. 194 р.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Godfellow J.W., O’Connor J.J., Murray D.W. A critique of revision rate as an outcome measure: re-interpretation of knee joint registry data. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010; 92(12):1628-1631.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Hooper G.J., Maxwell A.R., Wilkinson B. et al. The early radiological result of the uncemented Oxford medial compartment knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012; 94(3):334-338.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Kasodekar V.B., Yeo S.J., Othman S. Clinical outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and influence of alignment on prosthesis survival rate. Singapore Med J. 2006; 47(9):796-802.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Marmor L. Unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee with a minimum ten-year follow-up period. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988; (228):171-177.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Murray D.W., Goodfellow J.W., O’Connor J.J. The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998; 80: 983-989.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Pandit H., Jenkins C., Beard D.J. et al. Cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement shows reduced radiolucency at one year. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009; 91(2):185-189.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Pandit H., Jenkins C., Gill H.S., Baker K. Minimally invasive Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee replacement: result of 1000 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011; 93(2):198-204.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Price A.J., Svard U. A second decade lifetable survival analysis of the oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 2011; 469(1):174-179.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Ritter M.A., Meneghini R.M. Twenty-year survivoship of cementless anatomic graduated component total knee arthroplasty J Arthroplasty. 2010; 25(4): 3507-3513.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Saenz C.L., McGrath M.S., Marker D.R., Seyler T.M. Early failure of a unicompartmental knee arthroplasty design with an all-polyethylene tibial component. Knee. 2010; 17(1):53-56.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Scott R.D. Mobile-versus fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 2010; 59:57.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Squire M.W., Callagham J.J., Goetz D.D., Sullivan P.M. Unicompartmental knee replacement: a minimum 15 year followup study Clin Orthop. 1999; (367):61-72.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Svard U.C.G., Price A.J. Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001; 83:191-194.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Tabor O.B., Tabor Jr. O.B., Bernard M. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: long-term follow-up study. J Arthroplasty. 1998; 13:373-379.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Vorlat P., Putzeys G., Cottenie D. et al. The Oxford unicompartmental knee prosthesis: an independent 10-year survival analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006; 14:40.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>W-Dahl A., Robertsson A., Lidgren O. et al. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients aged less than 65. Acta Orthop. 2010; 81:90.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
