<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Травматология и ортопедия России</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2311-2905</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2542-0933</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Vreden National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1345</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21823/2311-2905-2019-25-4-28-32</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Reviews</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Обзоры</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="zh"><subject>Reviews</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject></subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Who Should Manage Periprosthetic Joint Infection? The Case for a Multidisciplinary Approach</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Кто должен лечить перипротезную инфекцию: необходимость мультидисциплинарного подхода</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Yacovelli</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Яковелли</surname><given-names>С.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="US">United States</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Steven Yacovelli — MD, Researcher Fellow </p><p>Department of Orthopedics</p></bio><email>Steven.yacovelli@rothmanortho.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Parvizi</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Парвизи</surname><given-names>Д.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="US">United States</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Javad Parvizi — MD, Professor, Director of Clinical Research</p><p>Department of Orthopedics</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Rothman Orthopedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Ортопедический институт Ротмана, Университетский госпиталь Томаса Джефферсона</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2019-12-23" publication-format="electronic"><day>23</day><month>12</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>25</volume><issue>4</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>28</fpage><lpage>32</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2019-12-22"><day>22</day><month>12</month><year>2019</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2019-12-22"><day>22</day><month>12</month><year>2019</year></date></history><permissions><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journal.rniito.org/jour/article/view/1345">https://journal.rniito.org/jour/article/view/1345</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is a complex disease state that is quite devastating to those affected. Improvement in diagnostic testing modalities and therapeutic techniques have led to significant advances in treatment for patients, but there is still a considerable gap in treatment success across providers and institutions. Where and who should be treating cases of PJI remains a debated topic. Many experts have proposed a new treatment model not dissimilar to that with which has been used to treat other complex disease states such as cancer for decades, and there is now a growing body of evidence to support such a strategy is superior. In this article, we evaluate the current body of literature on the topic and offer recommendations for the ideal treatment model for PJI: the multidisciplinary approach.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Перипротезная инфекция (ППИ) после тотального эндопротезирования является сложным заболеванием, разрушительным для организма пациентов. Улучшение методов диагностики и лечения привело к значительному прогрессу в лечении этой патологии, но все еще существует значительный разрыв в успехе лечения среди поставщиков и учреждений. Где и кто должен лечить пациентов с ППИ остается темой дискуссии. Многие эксперты предлагают новую модель лечения, не отличающуюся от той, которая использовалась в течение десятилетий для лечения других сложных заболеваний, таких как рак, и в настоящее время появляется все больше доказательств того, что такая стратегия является лучшей. В этой статье авторы приводят анализ современной литературы по этой теме и предлагают междисциплинарный подход в качестве идеальной модели лечения ППИ.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>periprosthetic joint infection</kwd><kwd>total joint arthroplasty</kwd><kwd>multidisciplinary approach to treatment</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>перипротезная инфекция</kwd><kwd>тотальное эндопротезирование</kwd><kwd>междисциплинарный поход к лечению</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>1. Kurtz S.M., Lau E., Schmier J., Ong K.L., Zhao K., Parvizi J. Infection burden for hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23(7):984-991. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.10.017.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>2. Parvizi J., Tan T.L., Goswami K., Higuera C., Della Valle C., Chen A.F., Shohat N. The 2018 Definition of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Infection: An Evidence-Based and Validated Criteria. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(5):1309-1314. e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.078.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>3. Tetreault M.W., Estrera K.A., Kayupov E., Brander C., Della Valle C.J. Are patients being evaluated for periprosthetic joint infection prior to referral to a tertiary care center? Arthroplasty Today. 2017;4(2): 216-220. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2017.10.001.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>4. Armstrong M.D., Carli A.V., Abdelbary H., Poitras S., Lapner P., Beaulé P.E. Tertiary care centre adherence to unified guidelines for management of periprosthetic joint infections: a gap analysis. Can J Surg. 2018;61(1): 34-41. doi:10.1503/cjs.008617.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>5. Anderson M.B., Arciola C.R., Sarvanan S.A., Campoccia D., Certain L., Diaz-Ledezma C. et al. General Assembly, Treatment, Multidisciplinary Issues: Proceedings of International Consensus on Orthopedic Infections. J Arthroplasty. 2019;34(2S):S239-S243. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.09.075.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>6. Son M.-S., Lau E., Parvizi J., Mont M.A., Bozic K.J., Kurtz S. What Are the Frequency, Associated Factors, and Mortality of Amputation and Arthrodesis After a Failed Infected TKA? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475(12): 2905-2913. doi:10.1007/s11999-017-5285</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>7. Dietz M.J., Springer B.D., Barnes P.D., Falciglia M., Friedrich A.D., Berendt A.R. et al. Best practices for centers of excellence in addressing periprosthetic joint infection. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015;23 Suppl:S12-7. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-14-00380.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>8. Ntalos D., Berger-Groch J., Rohde H., Grossterlinden L.G., Both A., Luebke A. et al. Implementation of a multidisciplinary infections conference affects the treatment plan in prosthetic joint infections of the hip: a retrospective study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019;139(4):467-473. doi: 10.1007/s00402-018-3079-6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>9. Yan C.H., Arciola C.R., Soriano A., Levin L.S., Bauer T.W., Parvizi J. Team Approach: The Management of Infection After Total Knee Replacement. JBJS Rev. 2018;6(4):e9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.17.00058.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>10. Minassian A.M., Osmon D.R., Berendt A.R. Clinical guidelines in the management of prosthetic joint infection. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014;69 Suppl 1:i29- 35.doi: 10.1093/jac/dku253.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>11. Ibrahim M.S., Raja S., Khan M.A., Haddad F.S. A multidisciplinary team approach to two-stage revision for the infected hip replacement: a minimum five-year follow-up study. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B(10):1312-318. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B10.32875.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>12. Petretta R., Phillips J., Toms A. Management of acute periprosthetic joint infection of the knee – Algorithms for the on call surgeon. Surgeon. 2017;15(2):83-92. doi:10.1016/j.surge.2016.06.001.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>13. Kheir M.M., Tan T.L., George J., Higuera C.A., Maltenfort M.G., Parvizi J. Development and Evaluation of a Prognostic Calculator for the Surgical Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infection. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(9):2986-2992.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.04.034.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>14. Jayakumar P., Moore M.L.G., Bozic K.J. Team Approach: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Management of Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis. JBJS Rev. 2019;7(6):e10. doi: 10.2106/jbjs.rvw.18.00133.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>15. Akgün D., Müller M., Perka C., Winkler T. High cure rate of periprosthetic hip joint infection with multidisciplinary team approach using standardized two-stage exchange. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019;14(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1122-0.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>16. Matar H.E., Stritch P., Emms N. Two-stage revisions of infected hip replacements: Subspecialisation and patient-reported outcome measures. J Orthop. 2019;16(2):179-181. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.02.011.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>17. Bravo T., Budhiparama N., Flynn S., Gaol I.L., Hidayat H., Ifran N.N. et al. Hip and Knee Section, Prevention, Postoperative Issues: Proceedings of International Consensus on Orthopedic Infections. J Arthroplasty. 2019;34(2S):S321-S323. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.09.017.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>18. Ravi B., Jenkinson R., Austin P.C., Croxford R., Wasserstein D., Escott B. et al. Relation between surgeon volume and risk of complications after total hip arthroplasty: propensity score matched cohort study. BMJ. 2014;348:g3284. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g3284.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>19. Song S.Y., Goodman S.B., Suh G., Finlay A.K., Huddleston J.I. 3rd, Maloney W.J., Amanatullah D.F. Surgery Before Subspecialty Referral for Periprosthetic Knee Infection Reduces the Likelihood of Infection Control. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018;476(10):1995-2002. doi: 10.1097/corr.0000000000000423.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>20. Parvizi J., Shohat N., Gehrke T. Prevention of periprosthetic joint infection. Bone Joint J. 2017;99-B(4_Supple_B):3-10. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.99b4.bjj-2016-1212.r1.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
