<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Травматология и ортопедия России</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2311-2905</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2542-0933</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Vreden National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1046</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21823/2311-2905-2018-24-3-65-73</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>CLINICAL STUDIES</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>КЛИНИЧЕСКИЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="zh"><subject>Clinical studies</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject></subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">ЕFFECTIVENESS OF FOUR-ROD FIXATION FOR PEDICLE SUBTRACTION SPINAL OSTEOTOMY</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>ЭФФЕКТИВНОСТЬ ЧЕТЫРЕХСТЕРЖНЕВОЙ ФИКСАЦИИ ПРИ ВЫПОЛНЕНИИ ПЕДИКУЛЯРНОЙ СУБТРАКЦИОННОЙ ОСТЕОТОМИИ ПОЗВОНОЧНИКА</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Panteleyev</surname><given-names>A. A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Пантелеев</surname><given-names>А. А.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p><italic>Andrey A. Panteleyev </italic>— orthopedic surgeon, Spinal<italic> </italic>Pathology Department.</p><p>10, ul. Priorova , 127299, Moscow.</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p/><p><italic>Пантелеев Андрей Андреевич </italic>—<italic> </italic>врач отделения<italic> </italic>патологии позвоночника.</p><p> </p>Ул. Приорова, д. 10, 127299, Москва.</bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Mironov</surname><given-names>S. P.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Миронов</surname><given-names>С. П.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p><italic>Sergey P. Mironov </italic>— Acad. RAS, Dr. Sci. (Med.), professor,<italic> </italic>director. </p><p>10, ul. Priorova , 127299, Moscow.</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p><italic>Миронов Сергей Павлович </italic>—<italic> </italic>академик РАН,<italic> </italic>д-р мед.<italic> </italic>наук, профессор, директор. </p><p>Ул. Приорова, д. 10, 127299, Москва.</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Buhtin</surname><given-names>K. M.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Бухтин</surname><given-names>К. М.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p><italic>Kirill M. Buhtin </italic>— Cand. Sci. (Med.), academic secretary<italic> </italic>of the dissertation board.</p><p>10, ul. Priorova , 127299, Moscow.</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p><italic>Бухтин Кирилл Михайлович </italic>—<italic> </italic>канд.<italic> </italic>мед.<italic> </italic>наук,<italic> </italic>ученый секретарь диссертационного совета. </p><p>Ул. Приорова, д. 10, 127299, Москва.</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Sazhnev</surname><given-names>M. L.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Сажнев</surname><given-names>М. Л.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p><italic>Maxim L. Sazhnev </italic>— Cand. Sci. (Med.), orthopedic sur-geon, Spinal Pathology Department.</p><p>10, ul. Priorova , 127299, Moscow.</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p><italic>Сажнев Максим Леонидович </italic>—<italic> </italic>канд.<italic> </italic>мед.<italic> </italic>наук,<italic> </italic>врач от-деления патологии позвоночника.</p><p>Ул. Приорова, д. 10, 127299, Москва.</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Kazmin</surname><given-names>A. I.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Казьмин</surname><given-names>А. И.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p><italic>Arkadiy I. Kazmin </italic>— Cand. Sci. (Med.), orthopedic<italic> </italic>surgeon, Spinal Pathology Department.</p><p>10, ul. Priorova , 127299, Moscow.</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p><italic>Казьмин Аркадий Иванович </italic>—<italic> </italic>канд.<italic> </italic>мед.<italic> </italic>наук,<italic> </italic>врач от-деления патологии позвоночника.</p><p>Ул. Приорова, д. 10, 127299, Москва.</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Pereverzev</surname><given-names>V. S.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Переверзев</surname><given-names>В. С.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p><italic>Vladimir S. Pereverzev </italic>— PhD student, Spinal Pathology<italic> </italic>Department.</p><p>10, ul. Priorova , 127299, Moscow.</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p><italic>Переверзев Владимир Сергеевич </italic>—<italic> </italic>аспирант отделе-ния патологии позвоночника.</p><p>Ул. Приорова, д. 10, 127299, Москва.</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Kolesov</surname><given-names>S. V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Колесов</surname><given-names>С. В.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p><italic>Sergey V. Kolesov </italic>— Dr. Sci. (Med.), head of the Spinal<italic> </italic>Pathology Department.</p><p>10, ul. Priorova , 127299, Moscow.</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p><italic>Колесов Сергей Васильевич </italic>—<italic> </italic>д-р мед.<italic> </italic>нак,<italic> </italic>заведу-ющий отделением патологии позвоночника.</p><p>Ул. Приорова, д. 10, 127299, Москва.</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Priorov National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics.</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ФГБУ «Национальный медицинский исследовательский центр травматологии и ортопедии им. Н.Н. Приорова» Минздрава России.</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2018-10-07" publication-format="electronic"><day>07</day><month>10</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>24</volume><issue>3</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>65</fpage><lpage>73</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2018-10-06"><day>06</day><month>10</month><year>2018</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2018-10-06"><day>06</day><month>10</month><year>2018</year></date></history><permissions><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journal.rniito.org/jour/article/view/1046">https://journal.rniito.org/jour/article/view/1046</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p><bold><italic>Introduction. </italic></bold>Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) provides for significant segmental correction of the sagittal<italic> </italic>balance of the spine. At the same time, the technique is associated with a high risk of complications, with rod fracture at the osteotomy site being the most common.</p><p><bold> <italic>The purpose </italic></bold>of this study — to assess the effectiveness of four-rod fixation compared to literature data on standard<italic> </italic>two-rod fixation in patients undergoing PSO.</p><p><bold> </bold><italic><bold>Materials and Methods.</bold> </italic>The study is a retrospective analysis of 47 consecutive patients with rigid spinal<italic> </italic>deformities, who underwent pedicle subtraction osteotomy at the lumbar level. The average age of the patients (33 females and 14 males) was 59.7 years. In all cases spinal fixation carried out using a four-rod construct with additional short rods at the osteotomy site. The minimal postoperative follow-up was 2 years. A detailed analysis of the radiographic data was carried out with calculation of the global sagittal balance and spinopelvic parameters. A detailed assessment of complications in the early and late postoperative periods was also performed. After an exhaustive review of literature, a comparative analysis was made of the four-rod fixation technique with current literature data on the frequency of complications (in particular, rod fractures in the osteotomy zone) after two-rod fixation.</p><p> <italic><bold>Results</bold>. </italic>In all cases the osteotomy was performed at one level, most often at L3 (49%). The average length of<italic> </italic>fixation was 9.8 segments. The average angle of segmental correction was 27.1°. In most cases, it was possible to achieve adequate correction of spinopelvic parameters. Among complications, bone resorption around screws was most prevalent (23.4% of cases). Proximal junctional kyphosis occurred in 12.8% of cases, neurologic deficit — in 14.9% of cases, infectious complications — in 10.6% cases. Asymptomatic pseudarthrosis, confirmed by CT data, was observed in 12.8% of patients. Rod fracture at the PSO site and adjacent segments was not observed in any of the cases. Rod fractures of other localization were observed in 10.6% of patients.</p><p> <italic><bold>Conclusion</bold>. A</italic>ccording to the literature, the frequency of rod fractures at the osteotomy site is the most frequent<italic> </italic>complication of PSO. The results of this study showed that four-rod fixation in PSO significantly reduces the incidence of pseudarthrosis and rod fracture rate in the long-term follow-up and provides greater control over the process of osteotomy closure.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p><bold><italic>Введение</italic>.</bold><italic> </italic>Педикулярная субтракционная остеотомия<italic> </italic>(PSO)<italic> </italic>обеспечивает выраженную коррекцию сагит-тального баланса позвоночника за счет одного позвоночно-двигательного сегмента. Однако методика со-пряжена с высоким риском осложнений, в структуре которых первое место занимают переломы стержней в зоне остеотомии.</p><p><italic><bold>Цель исследования</bold> </italic>—<italic> </italic>сравнить собственные результаты четырехстержневой фиксации при педикулярной<italic> </italic>субтракционной остеотомии позвоночника с результатами стандартной двухстержневой фиксации по дан-ным литературы.</p><p><bold> </bold><italic><bold>Материал и методы</bold>. </italic>В ходе исследования проведен ретроспективный анализ результатов лечения<italic> </italic>47<italic> </italic>по-следовательно поступивших пациентов с ригидными деформациями позвоночника, которым выполнялась педикулярная субтракционная остеотомия на поясничном уровне. Средний возраст пациентов составил 59,5 лет. Из 47 пациентов 33 были женщинами и 14 — мужчинами. Средняя протяженность фиксации соста-вила 9,8 сегмента. Средний угол сегментарной коррекции за счет PSO составил 27,1° (22–36°).Во всех случаях применялись титановые стержни и стандартная методика остеотомии. Фиксация позвоночника проводилась при помощи четырехстержневой конструкции с установкой дополнительных коротких стержней непосред-ственно в зоне остеотомии. Минимальный срок послеоперационного наблюдения составил 2 года (в среднем 3,2 года). Проводился подробный ретроспективный анализ рентгенографических данных с вычислением по-казателей глобального сагиттального баланса, позвоночно-тазовых параметров, а также степени глобальной и сегментарной коррекции за счет остеотомии. Также проводилась подробная оценка осложнений в раннем и отдаленном послеоперационных­ периодах. Был проведен сравнительный анализ эффективности четырех-стержневой фиксации зоны проведения PSO с данными мировой литературы по частоте­ осложнений, в част-ности переломов стержней в зоне остеотомии при двухстержневой фиксации.</p><p><bold> </bold><italic><bold>Результаты</bold>. </italic>Всем пациентам остеотомия выполнялась на одном уровне,<italic> </italic>наиболее часто<italic> </italic>—<italic> </italic>на уровне<italic> </italic>L3<italic> </italic>(49% пациентов). В большинстве случаев удалось добиться адекватной коррекции позвоночно-тазовых пара-метров. В структуре осложнений наиболее часто (23,4% ) наблюдалась резорбция вокруг винтов. Кифоз пере-ходной зоны имел место в 12,8% случаев, неврологический дефицит — в 14,9%. Инфекционные осложнения наблюдались у 10,6% пациентов. Формирование бессимптомного псевдоартроза, подтвержденного данными КТ, наблюдалось у 12,8% пациентов. Переломов стержней в зоне остеотомии и на уровне смежных сегментов не наблюдалось. Переломы стержней другой локализации произошли у 10,6% пациентов.</p><p><bold> <italic>Заключение. </italic></bold>Результаты исследования показали,<italic> </italic>что четырехстержневая фиксация при выполнении<italic> </italic>PSO<italic> </italic>спо-собствует значительному снижению риска развития псевдоартроза и переломов стержней в отдаленном периоде и обеспечивает более эффективный контроль над процессом смыкания зоны остеотомии.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>pedicle subtraction osteotomy</kwd><kwd>sagittal balance</kwd><kwd>four-rod fixation</kwd><kwd>spinopelvic parameters</kwd><kwd>rigid spine deformities.</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>педикулярная субтракционная остеотомия</kwd><kwd>сагиттальный баланс позвоночника</kwd><kwd>четырехстержневая фиксация</kwd><kwd>позвоночно-тазовые параметры</kwd><kwd>ригидные деформации позвоночника</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>1.	Schwab F., Blondel B., Chay E., Demakakos J., Lenke L., Tropiano P. et al. The comprehensive anatomical spinal osteotomy classification. Neurosurgery. 2014;74(1):112-120. DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000182o.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>2.	Hu X., Thapa A.J., Cai Z., Wang P., Huang L., Tang Y. et al. Comparison of Smith-Petersen osteotomy, pedicu-lar subtraction osteotomy, and poly-segmental wedge osteotomy in treating rigid thoracolumbar kyphotic de-formity in ankylosing spondylitis a systematic review and meta-analysis. Review. BMC Surg. 2016;22;16:4. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-015-0118-x.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>3.	Liu H., Yang C., Zheng Z., Ding W., Wang J., Wang H., Li S. Comparison of Smith-Petersen osteotomy and pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the correction of thoracolumbar kyphotic deformity in ankylosing spon-dylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40(8):570-579. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000815.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>4.	Kose K.C., Bozduman O., Yenigul A.E., Igrek S. Spinal os-teotomies: indications, limits and pitfalls. EFORT Open Rev. 2017;2(3):73-82. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.2.160069.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>5.	Gupta S., Gupta M.C. The nuances of pedicle sub-traction osteotomies. Review. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2018;29(3):355-363. DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2018.03.001.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>6.	Saifi C., Laratta J.L., Petridis P., Shillingford J.N., Lehman R.A., Lenke L.G. Vertebral column resection for rigid spinal deformity. Global Spine J. 2017;7(3):280-290. DOI: 10.1177/2192568217699203.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>7.	Makhni M.C., Shillingford J.N., Laratta J.L., Hyun S.J., Kim Y.J. Restoration of sagittal balance in spinal de-formity surgery. Review. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2018;61(2):167-179. DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2017.0404.013.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>8.	Thomasen E. Vertebral osteotomy for correction of ky-phosis in ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;(194):142-152.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>9.	Wang M.Y., Berven S.H. Lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy. Neurosurgery. 2007;60(2 Suppl 1):140-146. DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000249240.35731.8F.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>10.	Salvi G., Aubin C., Le Naveaux F., Wang X., Parent S. Biomechanical analysis of Ponte and pedicle subtrac-tion osteotomies for the surgical correction of ky-photic deformities. Eur Spine J. 2016;25(8):2452-2460. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-015-4279-1.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>11.	Hyun S-J., Kim Y.J., Rhim S-C. Spinal pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal imbalance patients. World J Clin Cases. 2013;1(8):242-248. DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v1.i8.242.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>12.	Hyun S.J., Rhim S.C. Clinical outcomes and complica-tions after pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sag-ittal imbalance patients: A long-term follow-up data. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2010;47(2):95-101. DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2010.47.2.95.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>13.	Cho K.J., Kim Y.T., Shin S.H. Suk S. Surgical treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis. Asian Spine J. 2014;8(3):371-381. DOI: 10.4184/asj.2014.8.3.371.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>15.	Daubs M.D., Lenke L.G., Cheh G., Stobbs G., Bridwell K.H. Adult spinal deformity surgery: Complications and outcomes in patients over age 60. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(20):2238-2244. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31814cf24a.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>16.	Auerbach J.D., Lenke L.G., Bridwell K.H., Sehn J.K., Milby A.H., Bumpass D. et al. Major complications and com-parison between 3-column osteotomy techniques in 105 consecutive spinal deformity procedures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37(14):1198-1210. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824fffde.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>17.	Bianco K., Schwab F.J., Norton R.P., Smith J.S., Obeid I., Mundis G.M. et al. Complications and intercenter vari-ability of three-column osteotomies for spinal deformity surgery: A retrospective review of 423 patients. Spine J. 2013;13(9):S60-S61. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.172.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>18.	Ferrero E., Liabaud B., Henry J.K. Sagittal alignment and complications following lumbar 3-column osteotomy: does the level of resection matter? J Neurosurg Spine. 2017;27(5):560-569. DOI: 10.3171/2017.3.SPINE16357.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>19.	Smith J.S., Gupta M.C., Klineberg E.O., Shaffrey C.I., Schwab F.J., Lafage V. et al. Complication rates as-sociated with 3-column osteotomy in 82 adult spinal deformity patients: retrospective review of a prospec-tively collected multicenter consecutive series with min-imum two-year follow-up [abstract]. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017;16(10):S376-S377. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.07.313.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>20.	Charosky S., Moreno P., Maxy P. Instability and instru-mentation failures after a PSO: a finite element analysis. Eur Spine J. 2014;23(11):2340-2349. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3295-x.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>21.	Smith J.S., Shaffrey E., Klineberg E., Shaffrey C.I., Lafage V., Schwab F.J. et al. Prospective multicenter assessment of risk factors for rod fracture following surgery for adult spinal deformity. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;21(6):994-1003. DOI: 10.3171/2014.9.SPINE131176.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>22.	Smith J.S., Klineberg E., Lafage V., Shaffrey C.I., Schwab F., Lafage R. et al. Prospective multicenter as-sessment of perioperative and minimum 2-year postop-erative complication rates Associated With Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016;25(1):1-14. DOI: 10.3171/2015.11.SPINE151036.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>23.	Smith J.S., Shaffrey C.I., Ames C.P., Demakakos J., Fu K.M., Keshavarzi S. et al. Assessment of sympto-matic rod fracture after posterior instrumented fusion for adult spinal deformity. Neurosurgery. 2012;71(4): 862-867. DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182672aab.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>24.	Scheer J.K., Tang J.A., Deviren V., Buckley J.M., Pekmezci M., McClellan R.T., Ames C.P. Biomechanical analysis of revision strategies for rod fracture in pedicle subtraction osteotomy. Neurosurgery. 2011;69(1):164-172. DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31820f362a.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>25.	Kavadi N., Tallarico R.A., Lavelle W.F. Analysis of instru-mentation failures after three column osteotomies of the spine. Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2017;12:19. DOI: 10.1186/s13013-017-0127-x.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>26.	Barton C., Noshchenko A., Patel V., Cain C., Kleck C., Burger E. Risk factors for rod fracture after posterior cor-rection of adult spinal deformity with osteotomy: a ret-rospective case-series. Scoliosis. 2015;10:30. DOI: 10.1186/s13013-015-0056-5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>27.	Yang B.P., Ondra S.L., Chen L.A., Jung H.S., Koski T.R., Salehi S.A. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of tho-racic and lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal imbalance. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006;5(1):9-17. DOI: 10.3171/spi.2006.5.1.9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>28.	Hyun S-J., Lenke L.G., Kim Y-C., Koester L.A., Blanke K.M. Comparison of standard 2-rod constructs to multiple-rod constructs for fixation across 3-column spinal oste-otomies. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39(22):1899-1904. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000556.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>29.	Palumbo M.A., Shah K.N., Eberson C.P., Hart R.A., Daniels A.H. Outrigger rod technique for supplemen-tal support of posterior spinal arthrodesis. Spine J. 2015;15(6):1409-1414. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.03.004.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>30.	Hallager D.W., Gehrchen M., Dahl B., Harris J.A., Gudipally M., Jenkins S. et al. Use of supplemental short pre-contoured accessory rods and cobalt chrome alloy posterior rods reduces primary rod strain and range of motion across the pedicle subtraction osteotomy level. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016;41(7):E388-E395. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001282.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>31.	Gupta S., Eksi M.S., Ames C.P., Deviren V., Durbin-Johnson B., Smith J.S., Gupta M.C. A novel 4-rod technique offers potential to reduce rod breakage and pseudarthrosis in pedicle subtraction osteotomies for adult spinal deformity correction. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2018;14(4):449-456. DOI: 10.1093/ons/opx151.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>32.	Jager Z.S., İnceoğlu S., Palmer D., Akpolat Y.T., Cheng W.K. Preventing instrumentation failure in three-column spinal osteotomy: biomechanical analysis of rod configuration. Spine Deform. 2016;4(1):3-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jspd.2015.06.005.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><mixed-citation>33.	Ikenaga M., Shikata J., Takemoto M., Tanaka C. Clinical outcomes and complications after pedicle subtraction osteotomy for correction of thoracolumbar kyphosis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007;6(4):330-336. DOI: 10.3171/spi.2007.6.4.330.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><mixed-citation>34.	Gupta M.C., Ferrero E., Mundis G., Smith J.S., Shaffrey C.I., Schwab F. et al. Pedicle subtraction osteotomy in the revision versus primary adult spinal deformity pa-tient: is there a difference in correction and complica-tions? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40(22):E1169-E1175. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001107.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><mixed-citation>35.	Van Royen B.J., Gast A.D. Lumbar osteotomy for correc-tion of thoracolumbar kyphotic deformity in ankylos-ing spondylitis. A structured review of three methods of treatment Lumbar osteotomy for correction of thora-columbar kyphotic deformity in ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1999;58(7):399-406.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><mixed-citation>36.	Bakaloudis G., Lolli F., Di Silvestre M., Greggi T., Astolfi S., Martikos K. et al. Thoracic pedicle subtraction oste-otomy in the treatment of severe pediatric deformities. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(Suppl. 1):S95-104. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1749-y.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><mixed-citation>37.	Kim Y.J., Bridwell K.H., Lenke L.G., Cheh G., Baldus C. Results of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomies for fixed sagit-tal imbalance. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(20):2189-2197. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31814b8371.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><mixed-citation>38.	Rose P.S., Bridwell K.H., Lenke L.G., Cronen G.A., Mulconrey D.S., Buchowski J.M., Kim Y.J. Role of pelvic incidence, thoracic kyphosis, and patient factors on sag-ittal plane correction following pedicle subtraction oste-otomy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(8):785-791. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819d0c86.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><label>38.</label><mixed-citation>39.	Lafage V., Ames C., Schwab F., Klineberg E., Akbarnia B., Smith J. et al. Changes in thoracic kyphosis negatively im-pact sagittal alignment after lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37(3):181-187. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318225b926.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B39"><label>39.</label><mixed-citation>40.	Eskilsson K., Sharma D., Johansson C., Hedlund R. The impact of spinopelvic morphology on the short-term outcome of pedicle subtraction osteotomy in 104 patients. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017;27(1):74-80. doi: 10.3171/2016.11.SPINE16601.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B40"><label>40.</label><mixed-citation>41.	Yu M., Silvestre C., Mouton T., Rachkidi R., Zeng L., Roussouly P. Analysis of the cervical spine sagittal align-ment in young idiopathic scoliosis: A morphological classification of 120 cases. Eur Spine J. 2013;22(11):2372-2381. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-2753-1.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B41"><label>41.</label><mixed-citation>42.	Januszewski J., Beckman J.M., Harris J.E., Turner A.W.L., Yen C.P., Uribe J.S. Biomechanical study of rod stress after pedicle subtraction osteotomy versus anterior col-umn reconstruction: A finite element study. Surg Neurol Int. 2017;8:207. DOI: 0.4103/sni.sni_44_17.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B42"><label>42.</label><mixed-citation>43.	Tang J.A., Leasure J.M., Smith J.S., Buckley J.M., Kondrashov D., Ames C.P. Effect of severity of rod con-tour on posterior rod failure in the setting of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO): a biomechanical study. Neurosurgery. 2013;72(2):276-282. DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31827ba066.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B43"><label>43.</label><mixed-citation>44.	Luca A., Ottardi C., Sasso M., Prosdocimo L., La Barbera L., Brayda-Bruno M. et al. Instrumentation failure fol-lowing pedicle subtraction osteotomy: the role of rod material, diameter, and multi-rod constructs. Eur Spine J. 2017;26(3):764-770. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4859-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B44"><label>44.</label><mixed-citation>45.	Hamilton D.K., Buza J.A., Passias P., Jalai C., Kim H.J., Ailon T. et al. The fate of patients with adult spinal de-formity incurring rod fracture after thoracolumbar fu-sion. World Neurosurg. 2017;106:905-911. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.07.061.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
