Pain syndrome in patient after hip replacement with a dual-modular femoral component (case report)

Cover Page

Cite item


Total hip replacements with dualmodular femoral components (stemneck interface) allow optimization of hip joint biomechanics via selective restoration of femoral anteversion, offset, and limb length theoretically improving muscle function and stability. Potential disadvantages are the additional stemneck interface and the possible generation of metal ions and debris by fretting and crevice corrosion. The authors reported a case of patient with dualmodular stem presenting with pain and decreased function. Earlyonset adverse inflammatory tissue reactions developed as a result of corrosion at the stemneck interface of a dualmodular implant, requiring subsequent revision of wellfixed components with an extended trochanteric osteotomy. Additional examinations excluded infection. We consider that patients with a modular stem and neck junction and presenting with pain should be suspected on corrosion at the stemneck interface and adverse inflammatory tissue reaction after infection exclusion.

About the authors

R. M. Tikhilov

Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics; Mechnikov NorthWestern State Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Russian Federation

I. I. Shubnyakov

Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics

Russian Federation

A. N. Kovalenko

Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics

Russian Federation

A. V. Tsybin

Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics

Russian Federation

V. P. Rumakin

Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics

Russian Federation


  1. Денисов А.О., Шильников В.А., Байбородов А.Б., Ярмилко А.В. Профилактика иррадиирующих болей после эндопротезирования тазобедренного сустава. Травматология и ортопедия России. 2009;(3):125-126.
  2. Тихилов Р.М. Шубняков И.И., Даниляк В.В., Куропаткин Г.В., Плиев Д.Г., Мясоедов А.А., Цыбин А.В. Биоматериалы, используемые в хирургии тазобедренного сустава. В кн.: Руководство по хирургии тазобедренного сустава. СПб.: РНИИТО им. Р.Р. Вредена, 2014; Т. 1, гл. 3. с. 71-111.
  3. Шильников В.А., Денисов А.О. Алгоритмы дифференциальной диагностики болевого синдрома после эндопротезирования тазобедренного сустава. Хирургия. Приложение к журналу Consilium Medicum. 2013;(2): 20-24.
  4. Шильников В.А., Тихилов P.M., Денисов А.О. Болевой синдром после эндопротезирования тазобедренного сустава. Травматология и ортопедия России. 2008; (2):106-109.
  5. Atwood S.A., Patten E.W., Bozic K.J., Pruitt L.A., Ries M.D. Corrosion-induced fracture of a double-modular hip prosthesis: a case report. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2010 ;92(6):1522-1525.
  6. Berry D.J., Harmsen W.S., Cabanela M.E., et al. Twentyfive year survivorship of two thousand consecutive primary Charnley total hip replacements: factors affecting survivorship of acetabular and femoral components. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2002; 84:171-177.
  7. Brown T.E., Larson B., Shen F. et al. Thigh pain after cementless total hip arthroplasty: evaluation and management. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 2002; 10:385.
  8. Cooper H.J., Urban R.M., Wixson R.L., Meneghini R.M., Jacobs J.J. Adverse local tissue reaction arising from corrosion at the femoral neck-body junction in a dual-taper stem with a cobalt-chromium modular neck. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2013; 95(10):865-872
  9. De Force B., Pickering H. A clearer view of how crevice corrosion occurs. J. Met. 1995; 47(9):22-27.
  10. Dujovne A.R., Krygier J.J., Wilson D.R., Brooks C.E. Fretting at the head/neck interface of modular hip prostheses. In: Proceedings of the Fourth World Biomaterials Congress; 1992 Apr. 24-28. Berlin, Germany. p 268.
  11. Dunar M.J. The proximal modular neck in THA: a bridge too far: affirms. Orthopedics. 2010; 33(9):640.
  12. Ethgen O., Bruyere O., Richy F. et al. Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2004; 86-A(5):963-974.
  13. Garbuz D.S., Tanzer M., Greidanus N.V., Masri B.A., Duncan C.P. The John Charnley Award: Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing versus large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2010 ;468(2):318-325.
  14. Gilbert J.L., Buckley C.A., Lautenschlager E.P. Titanium oxide film fracture and repassivation: the effect of potential, pH, and aeration. In: Medical applications of titanium and its alloys: The materials and biological issues. Conshohocken, PA: ASTM; 1996. p 199-215.
  15. Gilbert J.L., Jacobs J.J. The mechanical and electrochemical processes associated with taper fretting crevice corrosion: a review, in modularity of orthopedic implants. In: Marlowe D.E., Parr J.E., Mayor M.B. (eds). Modularity of orthopedic implants. Conshohocken, PA: ASTM; 1997.
  16. Gill I.P., Webb J., Sloan K., Beaver R.J. Corrosion at the neckstem junction as a cause of metal ion release and pseudotumour formation. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2012; 94(7):895-900.
  17. Goldberg J.R., Gilbert J.L. Electrochemical response of CoCrMo to high-speed fracture of its metal oxide using an electrochemical scratch test method. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1997 ;37(3):421-431.
  18. Graves S., Davidson D., Tomkins A., de Steiger R., Vial R., Lewis P. Hip and Knee. Arthroplasty Annual Report of Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. 2014. documents/10180/172286/Annual%20Report%202014.
  19. Hart A.J., Satchithananda K., Liddle A.D., Sabah S.A., McRobbie D., Henckel J., Cobb J.P., Skinner J.A., Mitchell A.W. Pseudotumors in association with well-functioning metal-on-metal hip prostheses: a case-control study using three-dimensional computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2012; 94(4):317-25.
  20. Hsu A.R., Gross C.E., Levine B.R. Pseudotumor from modular neck corrosion after ceramic-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty. Am. J. Orthop. 2012; 41(9):422-426.
  21. Langton D.J., Jameson S.S., Joyce T.J., Gandhi J.N., Sidaginamale R., Mereddy P., Lord J., Nargol A.V. Accelerating failure rate of the ASR total hip replacement. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2011; 93(8):1011-1016.
  22. Ling R.S., Charity J., Lee A.J., Whitehouse S.L., Timperley A.J., Gie G.A. The long-term results of the original Exeter polished cemented femoral component: a follow-up report. J. Arthroplasty. 2009; 24(4):511-517.
  23. Molloy D.O., Munir S., Jack C.M., Cross M.B., Walter W.L., Walter W.K. Sr. Fretting and corrosion in modular-neck total hip arthroplasty femoral stems. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2014; 96(6):488-493.
  24. Morscher E.W. Failures and successes in total hip replacement - why good ideas may not work. Scand. J. Surg. 2003; 92(2):113-120.
  25. Noble P.C., Alexander J.W., Lindahl L.J., Yew D.T., Granberry W.M., Tullos H.S. The anatomic basis of femoral component design. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1988; 235:148-165.
  26. Perino G., Ricciardi B.F., Jerabek S.A., Martignoni G., Wilner G., Maass D., Goldring S.R., Purdue P.E. Implant based differences in adverse local tissue reaction in failed total hip arthroplasties: a morphological and immunohistochemical study. BMC Clin. Pathol. 2014; 14:39.
  27. Philpott A., Weston-Simons J.S., Grammatopoulos G., Bejon P., Gill H.S., McLardy-Smith P. et al. Predictive outcomes of revision total hip replacement: a consecutive series of 1176 patients with a minimum 10-year follow-up. Maturitas. 2014; 77(2): 185-190.
  28. Soderman P., Malchau H., Herberts P. et al. Outcome after total hip arthroplasty: Part II. Disease-specific follow-up and the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop. Scand. 2001; 72:113-119.

Copyright (c) 2014

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 82474 от 10.12.2021.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies